What's new

Dubai signs deal to build infrastructure in occupied Kashmir: Indian govt

It is the responsibility of the ever incompetent MF foreign office of Pakistan. Find out the validity of this news, and record Pakistani official protest to the sob emiratis.

Although, it is not beyond the realm of possibilities for the uae to do this. If they sold out the Palestinians, the Kashmiris mean nothing to them.

Agree, we need to:
  1. Validate the news
  2. The above news may be true. India is building another alliance with the USA, Israel and UAE. If that's true, UAE can invest IOK.
  3. Another bit, the Iranian military general is in Pakistan looking for military hardware. It won't have happened unless Pakistan felt Arabs distancing away.
 
Last edited:
.
Who remember the say about us « Pakistanis are more Arabs than Arabs » ?
Blame mulahs. Specially the fake type. Those that are preaching nonsense to idiots, like how to hang (Banana) Kayla sharif facing Madina and indoctrinating, degrading equaling themselves to the dogs of Madina. What do you expect.
 
.
Ok, the territorial dispute being put aside. What's the harm in industrial parks? Won't Pakistan get a developed Kashmir when they liberate it? Or even excluding that maybe native Kashmiris can get some employment and development.
Their idea is to ensure Kashmir never sees any improvement with the hopes it will fuel insurgency for a long time
 
.
#1. This is just MOU, any investor will have to assess potential return before investing a single dollar.

#2. They can turn Kashmir into Dubai, still wouldn’t change the status of Kashmir as a disputed territory.

#3. If investment brings prosperity to local specially people in occupied valleys than it’s good.
 
.
Blame mulahs. Specially the fake type. Those that are preaching nonsense to idiots, like how to hang (Banana) Kayla sharif facing Madina and indoctrinating, degrading equaling themselves to the dogs of Madina. What do you expect.
Nah the Kayla sharif and kheera sharif variety are strictly Barelwis (btw 80% of Pakistanis are barelwis) and they hate the Saudis with passion even more so than hindus and jews.
#1. This is just MOU, any investor will have to assess potential return before investing a single dollar.

#2. They can turn Kashmir into Dubai, still wouldn’t change the status of Kashmir as a disputed territory.

#3. If investment brings prosperity to local specially people in occupied valleys than it’s good.
Definitely not good, with prosperity comes complacency and the inertia will make it near impossible to change status quo.

Pakistanis need to look at Kashmir sans Kashmiris as strictly a strategic interest, Kashmiris have done more than share to sabotage Pakistani interests in fact more than the Indians. Kashmiris should be used as pawn to achieve our objective to merger with Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
.
Hit them in Kashmir, ensure the Kashmiri people get the support to defend their land against these enemies

As always utilise Hindutva poison inside India to create the necessary backlash
Kashmiris betrayed Pakistan spectacularly on two occasions, once in '47 and another in '65, we have no obligation to protect anyone. Kashmir's liberation has to be looked at as strictly a territorial dispute and purging of Indians from the occupied Pakistani land, not Kashmiri.
One thing I give Emiratis credit for, they sure know how to troll Pakistanis.
Pakistan should have invaded and occupied the gulf fiefdoms in the late 80's and early 90's when they had the perfect opportunity and a nuclear deterrence would have kept the Western patrons at bay.
 
.
Nah the Kayla sharif and kheera sharif variety are strictly Barelwis (btw 80% of Pakistanis are barelwis) and they hate the Saudis with passion even more so than hindus and jews.
They have sectarian issue with their religious doctrine other than that their love for Habibi sharif is unwavering. Just like evangelical Christian have religious differences with Jews as Jews don’t accept Jesus (a.s) but at the same time they consider Jews to be (Bible) chosen people and fully support them in Washington.

When you spread things like, wo Syed-zaday, hum madina sharif ky kuty, bend over everywhere for tazeem. Phir asi hi qom tiyar ho gi.

I know Ahl-hadis tola is openly Pro Saudi but I am concerned about subliminal indoctrination and mental slavery of masses (mostly illiterates).
 
. . .
Salaam

If Palestinians didn't stop them why in the world would Kashmir mean anything to them?

They have lost so much political ground in the past few years though. The Gulf Arabs were considered leaders of the sunni world but it seems they understood it to mean rulers or something.
 
.
Salaam

If Palestinians didn't stop them why in the world would Kashmir mean anything to them?

They have lost so much political ground in the past few years though. The Gulf Arabs were considered leaders of the sunni world but it seems they understood it to mean rulers or something.

Don't expect anything positive from GCC bloc under MBS. These guys are only in it for personal gain. After recognising Israel the Arabs have already made a clear statement. Their intentions are clear.
first take back the chineese side ok kashmir, they robbed u without a war.

LOL we gave it to China. They didn't rob it Indian rapist.
 
.
Get rid of internal snakes and external snakes can be dealt at the appropriate time. Money have got no loyalty so does the gulf Arabs. No one else is going to fight our wars and we need to stand up on our own feet's.

Loyalty?.... Says who?.... we are famous around the world for double standards, U turns, switching sides on a phone call etc etc?... But I agree money can get states change loyalties....we did it so many times...from Brits to Americans, to Ummah to terrorists and now China.
With great pain, I would say that It's too little too late on Kashmir now....We have lost time and opportunities thousands of time.....now it's a lost cause. A very sad state of affairs.
 
.
Since when UAE represents the whole Arab world ? another joke is to see Pakistani Shia members and moderators making fun of this news, but they go out of their way to defend Ayatuallah's and Iran, when Kulbhushan Yadev was caught coming from Iran, and Uzair Baloch was spying for Iran... Irony is that PDF's Shia would call this news a betrayal to Pakistan while them parroting the Tehran's narratives and defending them day and night lol Is there a limit to the Shia's Lies? nah those who lied against the Companions of Rasool Allah will/can stoop to any low.
 
.
Kashmiris betrayed Pakistan spectacularly on two occasions, once in '47 and another in '65, we have no obligation to protect anyone. Kashmir's liberation has to be looked at as strictly a territorial dispute and purging of Indians from the occupied Pakistani land, not Kashmiri.
I don’t think you are entirely correct. I think 65, Kashmiri along with Pakistani major were able to kick Indians out of the valley. Pakistan traded Kashmir for area lost in Punjab at negotiations. Basically it was Pakistan that betrayed the Kashmiris.

There was a whole tread on this topic.
 
.
Inappropriate Language
This is a Good Move

The more money spent in Kashmir by India ,, The more jobs/employment created and higher standard of living

Just need to close off outside influences so indian Kashmiris can live in peace an grow and prosper

View attachment 786196

Indian Kashmir
View attachment 786197
Move your nasty dirty self about Indian Kashmir
My country is that

go suck your mommys piss through a straw from source

4A00E92E-70DE-4455-B328-AE2A8B0486F9.jpeg

Kashmir is not deemed Occupied by anybody outside of Pakistan
Hence Arabs countries happy to invest in Indian Kashmir ........They see no issue
Pak Agenda on Kashmir is not recognised any where
Himachel Pradesh

Sits next to Kashmir ABOVE northern Indian Punjab
View attachment 786213

UTTERKHAND INDIA
Lying bastard
The UN UK USA decrees it’s occupied by India

you lying motherfucker even your dad nehru said as such lying little bastard
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom