SOHEIL
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 15,796
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Patriot missiles failed to protect Saudi oil fields
So what's your suggestion?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Patriot missiles failed to protect Saudi oil fields
Those are probably protecting royal palaces. Still shows how PAF was able to intercept Indian and Iranian drone while this clearly shows a failure on the KSA air defenses.Patriot missiles failed to protect Saudi oil fields
I thought mods were supposed to be unbiased? Why is this mod flaming Saudi Arabia and wanting them to be attacked more?
Hijaz has a protector. No harm will come to it.This should raise serious concerns about the security of Hijaz and the capability of its custodians. Not able to find out who attacked is far worse than not being able to neutralize the attack. Pakistan needs to rethink its policy of sitting on the sidelines.
may be Americas can sell Thaad systems ,Thaad comminucation Systems, as well as Raytheon AN/TPY-2 Radars.This may be protect to Al saud from Hutsi attacks
Those are probably protecting royal palaces. Still shows how PAF was able to intercept Indian and Iranian drone while this clearly shows a failure on the KSA air defenses.
5 possibilites as to how & from where the attack was done:-
1-it was from Yemen, in this case the drone would have to cross approximately 1200km spending one & a half hour assuming it's flying at a speed of 800km/h.
2-it was from Iraq, in this case it has to cross 500km/h & spend approximately 40 minutes in KSA airspace.
3-it came from Iran, this is quite risky because if it is detected then the consiquences for Iran would be great.
4-it came from the sea, launched by a speed boat or a submarine, even more risky for Iran than the 3rd option.
5-it came from inside the KSA itself, Houthi spies used civilian drones, armed them with homemade explosives & programed them to fly towards the target & explode once they reach it.
personaly I believe th 5th option is the most likely, however if any of the first 4 options is correct then that is a big fail for American weapons, afterall Pompeo keeps on accusing Iran but they didn't actually give any evidence, in other words they saw absolutely nothing! they have no idea what happened so the only thing they do is guess, I'm sure the folks at Raytheon are scratching their heads trying to figure out what happened, either that or may be the US simply exports nothing but significantly downgraded garbage to the KSA.
5 possibilites as to how & from where the attack was done:-
1-it was from Yemen, in this case the drone would have to cross approximately 1200km spending one & a half hour assuming it's flying at a speed of 800km/h.
2-it was from Iraq, in this case it has to cross 500km/h & spend approximately 40 minutes in KSA airspace.
3-it came from Iran, this is quite risky because if it is detected then the consiquences for Iran would be great.
4-it came from the sea, launched by a speed boat or a submarine, even more risky for Iran than the 3rd option.
5-it came from inside the KSA itself, Houthi spies used civilian drones, armed them with homemade explosives & programed them to fly towards the target & explode once they reach it.
personaly I believe th 5th option is the most likely, however if any of the first 4 options is correct then that is a big fail for American weapons, afterall Pompeo keeps on accusing Iran but they didn't actually give any evidence, in other words they saw absolutely nothing! they have no idea what happened so the only thing they do is guess, I'm sure the folks at Raytheon are scratching their heads trying to figure out what happened, either that or may be the US simply exports nothing but significantly downgraded garbage to the KSA.
they were filmed from Iraq and Kuwait sooo its either from Iran or from Iraq they were crossing US and those 3 country military bases and early warning radars and there navy and air defenses like it was noting so you tell me how bad they performed.5 possibilites as to how & from where the attack was done:-
1-it was from Yemen, in this case the drone would have to cross approximately 1200km spending one & a half hour assuming it's flying at a speed of 800km/h.
2-it was from Iraq, in this case it has to cross 500km/h & spend approximately 40 minutes in KSA airspace.
3-it came from Iran, this is quite risky because if it is detected then the consiquences for Iran would be great.
4-it came from the sea, launched by a speed boat or a submarine, even more risky for Iran than the 3rd option.
5-it came from inside the KSA itself, Houthi spies used civilian drones, armed them with homemade explosives & programed them to fly towards the target & explode once they reach it.
personaly I believe th 5th option is the most likely, however if any of the first 4 options is correct then that is a big fail for American weapons, afterall Pompeo keeps on accusing Iran but they didn't actually give any evidence, in other words they saw absolutely nothing! they have no idea what happened so the only thing they do is guess, I'm sure the folks at Raytheon are scratching their heads trying to figure out what happened, either that or may be the US simply exports nothing but significantly downgraded garbage to the KSA.
But the photos clearly show the nozzles of the engine used in the Soumar missile.
Says you... All military experts would disagree with that.
they would not send simorgh there unless it was absolutely necessary and they were confident of its performance Shahed-191 is more likely as they were in war tone country and attacked near Us bases undetected so there is a real life performance for Shahed-191 there.