What's new

Drone crashes into battleship, causes $30 mln in damages

Mugwop

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
6,730
Reaction score
2
Country
Haiti
Location
Pakistan
A US Navy battleship suffered $30 million in equipment casualty after a drone accidentally crashed into it during a military exercise and wounded two sailors.
The occurrence happened last November near Point Mugu, California, but the website USNI just lately revealed the Navy will need about six months to completely repair the USS Chancellorsville.
According to the original Navy Times report on the accident, a malfunctioning Northrop Grumman BQM-74 crashed into the port side of the Chancellorsville during a training exercise that involved a routine radar test. The ship “was heavily damaged by the impact of a test target,” while the 13-foot drone itself “crippled a key computer center integral to the ship’s cutting-edge combat systems.”
The Chancellorsville had about 300 crewmen onboard at the time of the collision. Two were treated for minor burns, though the Navy did not say how the individuals were injured. Sailors had only a four-second warning once drone operators realized they lost control over the BQM-74.
“There was just a breakdown in communications … and the ship had no time to react,” an unnamed crewman told the Navy Times.
As USNI reported, BQM-74 drones are usually outfitted with a feature that would keep the machine from colliding into a naval vessel when control is lost, but it’s unclear whether or not this kind of capability was activated. The Navy added that the cause of the crash is still under investigation.

While the United States has deployed drones around the world, the unmanned vehicles have proven to be very susceptible to crashes. According to an NBC News report from last March, “drones are 30 to 300 percent more likely to crash than small civil aircrafts.” A 2012 survey from Bloomberg also found that for every 100,000 hours of drone flights, there are 9.31 accidents.

Despite these concerns, the Federal Aviation Administration recently announced the six states that will develop drone-testing sites as the agency paves the way for the vehicles to occupy US airspace, with some sites specifically focusing on developing “failure modes” for instances when a drone malfunctions. In 2012, Congress eased licensing restrictions related to domestic drone use, while the FAA expects roughly 7,500 drones to be roaming US skies within five years.

Some studies have estimated that a domestic drone industry could create between 70,000 – 100,000 jobs and generate $80 billion in economic activity. Privacy advocates, however, aren’t as keen on the prospect of drones hovering over American soil; the American Civil liberties Union has previously criticized the prospect, saying it would move the country towards “a surveillance society in which our every move is monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by the authorities.”
 
. .
1960s test target / target drone , not quite representative of the UAVs currently being developed and tested.

BQM-74E Aerial Target
Northrop BQM-74 Chukar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That being said, the systems have been updated with guidance and control that does represent some of the advances in UAV tech. Moreover, target drones are usually much more likely to be hitting things and hence need the "kill switch" so to speak. It seems that this was a freak occurrence that left the drone(travelling at some 500 knots) acting exactly like what its designed to replicate.
 
.
Looks like the drone....found it's target
yeahhh.jpg

caine.jpg%3Fw%3D468
 
. .
A US Navy battleship suffered $30 million in equipment casualty after a drone accidentally crashed into it during a military exercise and wounded two sailors.
The occurrence happened last November near Point Mugu, California, but the website USNI just lately revealed the Navy will need about six months to completely repair the USS Chancellorsville.
According to the original Navy Times report on the accident, a malfunctioning Northrop Grumman BQM-74 crashed into the port side of the Chancellorsville during a training exercise that involved a routine radar test. The ship “was heavily damaged by the impact of a test target,” while the 13-foot drone itself “crippled a key computer center integral to the ship’s cutting-edge combat systems.”
The Chancellorsville had about 300 crewmen onboard at the time of the collision. Two were treated for minor burns, though the Navy did not say how the individuals were injured. Sailors had only a four-second warning once drone operators realized they lost control over the BQM-74.
“There was just a breakdown in communications … and the ship had no time to react,” an unnamed crewman told the Navy Times.
As USNI reported, BQM-74 drones are usually outfitted with a feature that would keep the machine from colliding into a naval vessel when control is lost, but it’s unclear whether or not this kind of capability was activated. The Navy added that the cause of the crash is still under investigation.

While the United States has deployed drones around the world, the unmanned vehicles have proven to be very susceptible to crashes. According to an NBC News report from last March, “drones are 30 to 300 percent more likely to crash than small civil aircrafts.” A 2012 survey from Bloomberg also found that for every 100,000 hours of drone flights, there are 9.31 accidents.

Despite these concerns, the Federal Aviation Administration recently announced the six states that will develop drone-testing sites as the agency paves the way for the vehicles to occupy US airspace, with some sites specifically focusing on developing “failure modes” for instances when a drone malfunctions. In 2012, Congress eased licensing restrictions related to domestic drone use, while the FAA expects roughly 7,500 drones to be roaming US skies within five years.

Some studies have estimated that a domestic drone industry could create between 70,000 – 100,000 jobs and generate $80 billion in economic activity. Privacy advocates, however, aren’t as keen on the prospect of drones hovering over American soil; the American Civil liberties Union has previously criticized the prospect, saying it would move the country towards “a surveillance society in which our every move is monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by the authorities.”
:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
 
. .
Hardly suprising> control of the drone was lost VERY closein (1600m), so I would suppose the ship was not expecting to have to defend itself for real. It then switches on Phalanx for real rather late in a last attempt. Not the ideal (or even normal) circumstance. It is amazing it even got off any shots. Compare Stark and Eilat hits (both cases: phalanx was off). Compare a single incident like this with - how many - successful intercepts during exercises?

Phalanx is extremely reliable, having shot down targets drones in hundreds of tests since the system’s introduction in the 1980s. A land-based version of the gun is used by U.S. ground forces to destroy insurgents’ rockets and mortars, again with a very high rate of success.
...
Weaknesses and liabilities aside, Navy officers still swear by the automated gun. “It really works,” says Pete Daly, a retired vice admiral who is now CEO of the U.S. Naval Institute. In 1995, Daly was in command of the destroyer USS Russell off the Hawaiian coast. An operator launched a BQM-74 from Kauai and accidentally steered it directly at Russell. The destroyer’s Phalanx shot the robot from the sky. “The close-in system worked perfectly,” Daly tells War is Boring.

Malfunctioning_drone_hits_San_Diego_base_1100460000_1272400_ver1.0_640_480.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
A US Navy battleship suffered $30 million in equipment casualty after a drone accidentally crashed into it during a military exercise and wounded two sailors.
The occurrence happened last November near Point Mugu, California, but the website USNI just lately revealed the Navy will need about six months to completely repair the USS Chancellorsville.
According to the original Navy Times report on the accident, a malfunctioning Northrop Grumman BQM-74 crashed into the port side of the Chancellorsville during a training exercise that involved a routine radar test. The ship “was heavily damaged by the impact of a test target,” while the 13-foot drone itself “crippled a key computer center integral to the ship’s cutting-edge combat systems.”
The Chancellorsville had about 300 crewmen onboard at the time of the collision. Two were treated for minor burns, though the Navy did not say how the individuals were injured. Sailors had only a four-second warning once drone operators realized they lost control over the BQM-74.
“There was just a breakdown in communications … and the ship had no time to react,” an unnamed crewman told the Navy Times.
As USNI reported, BQM-74 drones are usually outfitted with a feature that would keep the machine from colliding into a naval vessel when control is lost, but it’s unclear whether or not this kind of capability was activated. The Navy added that the cause of the crash is still under investigation.

While the United States has deployed drones around the world, the unmanned vehicles have proven to be very susceptible to crashes. According to an NBC News report from last March, “drones are 30 to 300 percent more likely to crash than small civil aircrafts.” A 2012 survey from Bloomberg also found that for every 100,000 hours of drone flights, there are 9.31 accidents.

Despite these concerns, the Federal Aviation Administration recently announced the six states that will develop drone-testing sites as the agency paves the way for the vehicles to occupy US airspace, with some sites specifically focusing on developing “failure modes” for instances when a drone malfunctions. In 2012, Congress eased licensing restrictions related to domestic drone use, while the FAA expects roughly 7,500 drones to be roaming US skies within five years.

Some studies have estimated that a domestic drone industry could create between 70,000 – 100,000 jobs and generate $80 billion in economic activity. Privacy advocates, however, aren’t as keen on the prospect of drones hovering over American soil; the American Civil liberties Union has previously criticized the prospect, saying it would move the country towards “a surveillance society in which our every move is monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by the authorities.”

Must be chinese copy otherwise US tech is much advance and never fail:coffee:
 
. . .
Must be chinese copy otherwise US tech is much advance and never fail:coffee:

So the hunter has become the hunted.

Damn the Americans coping our design that we originally copied from them.

This is how it feels to be copied, it doesn't feel good.

Oh well, tomorrow's another day.
 
.
Hardly suprising> control of the drone was lost VERY closein (1600m), so I would suppose the ship was not expecting to have to defend itself for real. It then switches on Phalanx for real rather late in a last attempt. Not the ideal (or even normal) circumstance. It is amazing it even got off any shots. Compare Stark and Eilat hits (both cases: phalanx was off). Compare a single incident like this with - how many - successful intercepts during exercises?



Malfunctioning_drone_hits_San_Diego_base_1100460000_1272400_ver1.0_640_480.jpg

Ok so whats the point you are tryin to make? In exercises lots of things happen successfully. They are controlled environments. Am also sure, there couuld be instances where it performed perfectly. But, something in this case failed. The question is what and how to prevent it from happening again
 
.
Ok so whats the point you are tryin to make? In exercises lots of things happen successfully. They are controlled environments. Am also sure, there couuld be instances where it performed perfectly. But, something in this case failed. The question is what and how to prevent it from happening again
Folks were suggesting USN missile defences, notably Phalanx, were inadequate. I beg to differ.
 
.
So the hunter has become the hunted.

Damn the Americans coping our design that we originally copied from them.

This is how it feels to be copied, it doesn't feel good.

Oh well, tomorrow's another day.

Shit happens. We'll pull 30 million out of our seat cushions to pay for this.

Let me know the next time one of our rockets crash lands back to earth killing an entire village, then maybe we'll care.

Chinese Rocket Failure Plus Aftermath | Military.com
 
.
Back
Top Bottom