DRDO readies shield against Chinese ICBMs Read more at: http://indiatoday

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Using expensive option such ICBM to take care of India is stupid...it's more faster, cheap and devestating to use cruise missiles, long range rocket or short range missiles to pound India strategic targets...

 

[tanlixiang28776]

I do not understand the excitement for something that at this point so far away from reality.

India has not demonstrated any form of mid course interception needed to intercept IRBMs never mind ICBMs. What India has demonstrated so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs

Even the US is very far away from any kind of credible defense against ICBMs with SM 3 tests at around 50% success rate. There is optimism and there is reality.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

^^^^ only 1 or 2 of our ABM tests failed rest have been successful and dw there will be more test launches and in case you didn't know we are developing missiles and lasers to intercept ballistic missiles in there boost phase alone however China has the geographic advantage which is why we are building the AD-1 AD-2 and PDV missiles.

 

[EastWest]

I do not understand the excitement for something that at this point so far away from reality.

India has not demonstrated any form of mid course interception needed to intercept IRBMs never mind ICBMs. What India has demonstrated so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs

Even the US is very far away from any kind of credible defense against ICBMs with SM 3 tests at around 50% success rate. There is optimism and there is reality.

Any evidence to prove this claim..or as usual vomiting cr@p...?

 

[patriot_indian]

why are moderators dumb now when a chinese trolls. seems chinese are allowed troll here and indians to be banned .. what more can we expect

Have you tried that on your orwn ACs?

 

[Omega007]

the Barak-8 and AAD missiles can intercept low flying stealthy cruise missiles this part is not to worry we will have all aspect missile defense against cruise and ballistic missiles

Yes they can.The AAD is basically a long range(200 km)high altitude(30 km) anti aircraft missile like S 300 or Aster 30.So both AAD and Barak 8 can shoot down low flying cruise missiles.But the main prob will be to detect and track the incoming cruise missiles at ranges long enough to make a successful interception.The ground radars have blind spots in lower altitudes due to heavy ground clutters so we need to develop and deploy sufficient numbers of aerostats and AWACS with longrange AESA and FLIR sencors to bridge the gap in radar coverage.

 

[HongWu]

What India has demonstrated so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs.

Correction: What Israel has demonstrated in India so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs.

But alas India supports Palestine so maybe the Israeli defense shield will fail at an unfortunate moment.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

Correction: What Israel[/U] has demonstrated in India so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs.

But alas India supports Palestine so maybe the Israeli defense shield will fail at an unfortunate moment.

other than cooperating with us on the ABM radar they have nothing else to do with the program oh and eat this

China's Missile Imports and Assistance From Abroad

ISRAEL
Assistance in cruise missile development:

--YF-12A
--YJ-62
--YJ-92
--Sharing of technology of Israeli land-attack cruise missile based on Star-1 attack drone (Beijing is contributing financially to missile's development) (1995)
Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation equipment (1991)
Assistance in improving guidance of M-9 and DF-3 (CSS-2) ballistic missiles
US Patriot anti-missile system technology:

--Guidance and propulsion technology (in return for information on M-9 and M-11 ballistic missiles)
--Reportedly used to develop countermeasures against Patriot for China's ballistic and cruise missiles
US Python-3 air-to-air missiles (AAMs)
UAV

--"Harpy" anti-radar drones (2002)

 

[Omega007]

^^^^ only 1 or 2 of our ABM tests failed rest have been successful and dw there will be more test launches and in case you didn't know we are developing missiles and lasers to intercept ballistic missiles in there boost phase alone however China has the geographic advantage which is why we are building the AD-1 AD-2 and PDV missiles.

Mate,beg to differ.Actually,not a single interception test has been failed in Indian ABM.The failure of which you are talking was actually the failure of the target Dhanush missile which soon after its launch deviated from its trajectory and fell into the ocean.The radars detected the deviation and artificial inteligent system of the FCS stopped the AAD launch as the target had slipped out of the interceptor's range.So how that can be a failure of the interceptor in first place??Our ABM has so far the highest success rate in the world-100%.Now only thing the DRDO should try to do is to intercept the Agni 1 MRBM insted of liquid fueled Dhanush SRBM using PDV.By intercepting the modified Dhanush,DRDO has validated the ABM's effectiveness against liquid fueled MRBMs like Ghauri 2 but the solid fueled ballistic missiles like Shaheen 2 have much higher terminal velocity than their liquid fueled counterparts.So now in order to successfully validate its ABM against incoming solid fueled BMs DRDO must test the PDV against Agni 1 missiles.
REGARDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

[agentperry]

I do not understand the excitement for something that at this point so far away from reality.

India has not demonstrated any form of mid course interception needed to intercept IRBMs never mind ICBMs. What India has demonstrated so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs

Even the US is very far away from any kind of credible defense against ICBMs with SM 3 tests at around 50% success rate. There is optimism and there is reality.

your baidu dont show you Indian BMD/ABM test results. bad. use doodle. its effective too.

 

[HongWu]

other than cooperating with us on the ABM radar they have nothing else to do with the program oh and eat this

China's Missile Imports and Assistance From Abroad

LOL..... Israel has nothing to do with the program except for the ABM radar

If you think that India will deploy a national missile defense system before USA even though it is well known as a third world country prone to deluding itself ...... then go right ahead and believe that

 

[Omega007]

Correction: What Israel has demonstrated in India so far is terminal interception with a less than 50% success rate. This is not any kind of credible defense against a country with a full nuclear triad, MIRVs, and SLBMs.

But alas India supports Palestine so maybe the Israeli defense shield will fail at an unfortunate moment.

Even the US has started to deplow the THAAD which is also a terminal defence system.
Russian S 400 is another example of terminal defence system.Face it,the bulky mid course interceptors are things of history.
By the way,your only intention is to trolling around.
We don't even use the Israely Green Pine.Our Sword Fish MkI has double the tracking range at 800 km against a fighter.The MkII is already under testing and has range of 1600-2000 km,so talk after you develop something close to that.
What 'less than 50%' success rate??Our ABM has 100% success rate.The modified heavier Dhanush missiles are configured to mimic the trajectory of Pakistani Ghaury IRBMs.The PDV will take the interception to 3000 km range missiles making your DF 21s ineffective.And this is just the 1st phase,so why are bringing ICBMs here??The 1st phase is against IRBMs.That's why we say to read a bit before you pour your BS here.
REGARDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

[LiberalAtheist]

LOL..... Israel has nothing to do with the program except for the ABM radar

If you think that India will deploy a national missile defense system before USA even though it is well known as a third world country prone to deluding itself ...... then go right ahead and believe that

we don't have plans for a national missile defense system thats way to expensive and not suited for our needs we need theater based ballistic missile defense at the most .... and USA faces ICBM threat from Russia and China India at the most faces missile threats up to 3,000km from Pakistan and 6,000km from China but most likely 2,000 and 5,000 km respectively

 

[Omega007]

LOL..... Israel has nothing to do with the program except for the ABM radar

If you think that India will deploy a national missile defense system before USA even though it is well known as a third world country prone to deluding itself ...... then go right ahead and believe that

Trolling at its best. . . . . . . huh??The Sword Fish MkI is a completely different system than the Green Pine.The L band TR modules LRDE developed,cooling system-Indian,back processor-Indian,power system-Indian,Anterna Array Unit-Indian. . . . . . . yet the radar is Israelly!!Great logic.
REGARDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

[Alchemy]

By the way even Chinese supports Palestine , so i guess your going by same "logic" your MISSILE-RELATED DEVELOPMENTS will fail too ... grow up , stop trolling !

China announces support for Palestinian UN statehood bid - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News