Indischer
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,844
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
What she was mentioning was nothing more than the usual bullshit as the leftist do about Hindus and attacking the Hindu society. The pointer was about her lack of courage to spew equal garbage about other religions and where that would get her. As to why that would prompt her to change her view on that matter, who knows? There are people who having compared all religions and their adherents responses to constantly being attacked, come home to discover that what they have spewed venom and invective over all their life was not so bad after all.
I do not know where he hinted that rape is a bigger shame for a woman than a man. I did not see him mention any man or do a comparative rape analysis for each.
She isn't even telling that High caste Hindus were assaulting or raping the lower castes. It was a question of the seeming divide between castes in Hinduism, and one in which Muslims or Christians need not even be dragged into. But from where does rape even come into the picture? If anything, it's an indication that he ran out of ideas to counter her arguments.
The hint is in the fact that he advocated rape for her because she was a woman, implying it's a stigma that women have to live with for the rest of their lives. Might have as well suggested a burglary if he didn't see rape as a tool to humiliate women for life. I'd also bet my entire fortune that he wouldn't suggest rape if the person in question was a Man, in spite of the fact that Men can just as well be raped.