DPC, Khatm-e-Nabuwwat condemn arrest of blasphemy accused girl: Report

[Spring Onion]

The only thing left is to ask you, what are your views on the corruption of our society by various "Arab leased" versions if Islam? (Circa, 1976 - 2012)

:

In my opinion there is no such thing called Arab version of Islam. Since Islam in itself was prime reason to end Arabism .

Some Muslim Islamophobic writers/intellectuals with non-Muslim roots (still overpowering them ) try hard to bash Islam by calling Islamic greetings "Assalam o Alaikum" and few other such words as Arabisn which i dont think so are.

 

[Ahmad]

Punishment for Blasphemy in the Light of Religious Scriptures



Pakistan is the land of hot issues it would not be a false statement at all. Whether it is the religious, political, economic or social issues; Pakistan is the place you will find on top of all. Lately, the issue of blasphemy has arisen when a session court (lower court) sentence Asiya Bibi (who was Christian by faith) to death after finding her guilty her of sacrilegious comments.

The debate of repealing this law has come out of blue this time after 2-3 decades of legislation regarding. There are several opinions regarding this blasphemy act 295 (c) of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. There are oodles of angles to this law, whether it be religious, democratic, political or human right.

We have gathered some evidences from the Quran, Hadith, Sunnah and history (compiled by historians) for the exact punishment for blasphemy. This will also answer the most asked question “What Muhammad (S.A.W) would have done?” “How he would have responded?” and many supplementary questions like “What Quran says?”, “Is there any evidence in Hadith?” and “What other religions say about blasphemy?”

Let’s start from a Quranic verse:

The above verse of Surah e Ahzab (Chapter 33:6) shows the right of a Allah’s Apostle Muhammad (S.A.W) on Muslims. It is clear from the word of GOD that Muhammad (S.A.W) has more right over our lives and closest of relations.

The following Reference of Holy Quran Chapter 4 V 65 was revealed when a man was beheaded by the Hazrat Umar (R.A) due to non compliance of judgment given by Holy prophet Mohammad (S.A.W).

Context of Revelation (Chapter 4, V 65):

Al-Hafiz Abu Ishaq Ibrahim bin `Abdur-Rahman bin Ibrahim bin Duhaym recorded that Damrah narrated that two men took their dispute to the Prophet , and he gave a judgment to the benefit of whoever among them had the right. The person who lost the dispute said, “I do not agree.” The other person asked him, “What do you want then” He said, “Let us go to Abu Bakr As-Siddiq.” They went to Abu Bakr and the person who won the dispute said, “We went to the Prophet with our dispute and he issued a decision in my favor.” Abu Bakr said, “Then the decision is that which theMessenger of Allah issued.” The person who lost the dispute still rejected the decision and said, “Let us go to `Umar bin Al-Khattab.” When they went to `Umar, the person who won the dispute said, “We took our dispute to the Prophet and he decided in my favor, but this man refused to submit to the decision.” `Umar bin Al-Khattab asked the second man and he concurred. `Umar went to his house and emerged from it holding aloft his sword. He struck the head of the man who rejected the Prophet’s decision with the sword and killed him.

Consequently, Allah revealed, the aforementioned verse.[Context taken from Tafseer Ibn-e-Kathir]

Let’s get to another verse where Allah (SWT) announces the punishment for enemies (of ALLAH and His Apostle) and who so ever attributes disgrace to Allah and His Apostle Mohammad (S.A.W).

May we present another verse from the Quran where Allah immediately answers to the sacrilegious comment made by the blood relative (uncle) of Allah’s Apostle Mohammad (S.A.W).

Context of Revelation

Abu Lahab (Father of Flame) was the nickname of ‘Abd Al-’Uzza, the Holy Prophet’s uncle and his inveterate enemy and persecutor. He was so called either because his complexion and hair were ruddy or also because he had a fiery temper. The Surah recalls an incident during the early preaching of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W). On being commanded by Allah (S.W.T) to call together his relatives and to deliver to them the Divine Message, the Holy Prophet, one day, stood on mount Safa and called the different Meccan (Makkah’s) tribes by name, the tribes of Luwayy, Murrah, Kilab and Qusayy and his near relatives, and told them that he is God’s Messenger, and that if they did not accept his Message and did not give up their evil ways, Divine punishment would overtake them. The Holy Prophet had hardly his speech, when Abu Lahab stood up and said, ‘Ruin seize thee, is it for this that thou hast called us together’ (Bukhari).

Another precedent from the Holy Quran where Allah (SWT) directly replied to Waleed bin Mughaira, who called Mohammad (S.A.W) Majnoon (Insane) by uncovering the hidden truth regarding his illegitimate birth upon him.

Now let’s move to the evidences from Hadiths.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 372:

Narrated Al-Bara:
Allah’s Apostle sent ‘Abdullah bin ‘Atik and ‘Abdullah bin ‘Utba with a group of men to Abu Rafi (to kill him). They proceeded till they approached his castle, whereupon Abdullah bin Atik said to them, “Wait (here), and in the meantime I will go and see.” ‘Abdullah said later on, “I played a trick in order to enter the castle. By chance, they lost a donkey of theirs and came out carrying a flaming light to search for it. I was afraid that they would recognize me, so I covered my head and legs and pretended to answer the call to nature. The gatekeeper called, ‘Whoever wants to come in, should come in before I close the gate.’ So I went in and hid myself in a stall of a donkey near the gate of the castle. They took their supper with Abu Rafi and had a chat till late at night. Then they went back to their homes. When the voices vanished and I no longer detected any movement, I came out. I had seen where the gate-keeper had kept the key of the castle in a hole in the wall. I took it and unlocked the gate of the castle, saying to myself, ‘If these people should notice me, I will run away easily.’ Then I locked all the doors of their houses from outside while they were inside, and ascended to Abu Rafi by a staircase. I saw the house in complete darkness with its light off, and I could not know where the man was. So I called, ‘O Abu Rafi!’ He replied, ‘Who is it?’ I proceeded towards the voice and hit him. He cried loudly but my blow was futile. Then I came to him, pretending to help him, saying with a different tone of my voice, ‘ What is wrong with you, O Abu Rafi?’ He said, ‘Are you not surprised? Woe on your mother! A man has come to me and hit me with a sword!’ So again I aimed at him and hit him, but the blow proved futile again, and on that Abu Rafi cried loudly and his wife got up. I came again and changed my voice as if I were a helper, and found Abu Rafi lying straight on his back, so I drove the sword into his belly and bent on it till I heard the sound of a bone break. Then I came out, filled with astonishment and went to the staircase to descend, but I fell down from it and got my leg dislocated. I bandaged it and went to my companions limping. I said (to them), ‘Go and tell Allah’s Apostle of this good news, but I will not leave (this place) till I hear the news of his (i.e. Abu Rafi’s) death.’ When dawn broke, an announcer of death got over the wall and announced, ‘I convey to you the news of Abu Rafi’s death.’ I got up and proceeded without feeling any pain till I caught up with my companions before they reached the Prophet to whom I conveyed the good news.”

At the conquest of Makkah:

Holy prophet Mohammad (S.A.W) announced general amnesty to all except those who were guilty of blasphemous acts and sacrilegious statements, Ibn e Khatal was one of the convict (Tareekh-e-Tabari Page 104 / History written by Al Tabari) This is evident from the following Hadith.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 582:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

On the day of the Conquest, the Prophet entered Mecca, wearing a helmet on his head. When he took it off, a man came and said, “Ibn e Khatal is clinging to the curtain of the Ka’ba.” The Prophet said, “Kill him.”

Sahih Bukahri Volume 5, Book 59, Number 369:

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

Allah’s Apostle said, “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” The Prophet said, “Yes,” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab). “The Prophet said, “You may say it.” Then Muhammad bin Maslama went to Kab and said, “That man (i.e. Muhammad demands Sadaqa (i.e. Zakat) from us, and he has troubled us, and I have come to borrow something from you.” On that, Kab said, “By Allah, you will get tired of him!” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Now as we have followed him, we do not want to leave him unless and until we see how his end is going to be. Now we want you to lend us a camel load or two of food.”

(Some difference between narrators about a camel load or two.) Kab said, “Yes, (I will lend you), but you should mortgage something to me.” Muhammad bin Mas-lama and his companion said, “What do you want?” Ka’b replied, “Mortgage your women to me.” They said, “How can we mortgage our women to you and you are the most handsome of the ‘Arabs?” Ka’b said, “Then mortgage your sons to me.” They said, “How can we mortgage our sons to you? Later they would be abused by the people’s saying that so-and-so has been mortgaged for a camel load of food. That would cause us great disgrace, but we will mortgage our arms to you. “Muhammad bin Maslama and his companion promised Kab that Muhammad would return to him. He came to Kab at night along with Kab’s foster brother, Abu Na’ila. Kab invited them to come into his fort, and then he went down to them. His wife asked him, “Where are you going at this time?” Kab replied, “None but Muhammad bin Maslama and my (foster) brother Abu Na’ila have come.”

His wife said, “I hear a voice as if dropping blood is from him, Ka’b said. “They are none but my brother Muhammad bin Maslama and my foster brother Abu Naila. A generous man should respond to a call at night even if invited to be killed.” Muhammad bin Maslama went with two men. (Some narrators mention the men as ‘Abu bin Jabr. Al Harith bin Aus and Abbad bin Bishr). So Muhammad bin Maslama went in together with two men, and sail to them, “When Ka’b comes, I will touch his hair and smell it, and when you see that I have got hold of his head, strip him. I will let you smell his head.” Kab bin Al-Ashraf came down to them wrapped in his clothes, and diffusing perfume. Muhammad bin Maslama said. “have never smelt a better scent than this. Ka’b replied. “I have got the best Arab women who know how to use the high class of perfume.” Muhammad bin Maslama requested Ka’b “Will you allow me to smell your head?” Ka’b said, “Yes.” Muhammad smelt it and made his companions smell it as well. Then he requested Ka’b again, “Will you let me (smell your head)?” Ka’b said, “Yes.” When Muhammad got a strong hold of him, he said (to his companions), “Get at him!” So they killed him and went to the Prophet and informed him. (Abu Rafi) was killed after Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf.”

Punishment in Bible for blasphemy:

The punishment for blasphemy in most of the major religions is death. It is stated in the Old Testament of the Bible, which is the authority for both the Jews and the Christians:

And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: [Book of Leviticus 24:16]

A reference from Hindu Scripture:

“If a man born of a lower class intentionally bothers a priest, the king should punish him physically with various forms of corporal and capital punishment that make men shudder.” [Manusmriti 9:248]

Conclusion:

It is evident from the above references that the punishment for the act of blasphemy in any religion or any form is very severe. Hence, people who are waging a campaign against the article 295 (c) of the constitution to repeal the said law, is not aligned with Islamic, Christianity and Hinduism religious law.

The current law is compliant with the ethical and moral values of society Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

In a nutshell, this law should stay in place to prevent blasphemous acts. But by no means,anyone should be allowed to use this law for personal vendetta or misuse it. Procedural changes should be made with the consent of Ulema to prevent the misuse of the underlying law.

The above thing includes all the example from Quran and Sunnah and slap on the faces of secular traitors on this forum

Thanks for the effort, could you add the Arabic text as well plz?

 

[Uchiha]

In my opinion there is no such thing called Arab version of Islam. Since Islam in itself was prime reason to end Arabism .

Some Muslim Islamophobic writers/intellectuals with non-Muslim roots (still overpowering them ) try hard to bash Islam by calling Islamic greetings "Assalam o Alaikum" and few other such words as Arabisn which i dont think so are.

Deobandi pathans and salafis get along that well?
If you knew the least bit about what you're saying, even arabs don't say salam3leikum, there are many alternatives, not even an idiot will call that arabism. I know you're just trying to score brownie points for you radical types but remember: YUSUFALI: Nay, We hurl the Truth against falsehood, and it knocks out its brain, and behold, falsehood doth perish! Ah! woe be to you for the (false) things ye ascribe (to Us).
PICKTHAL: Nay, but We hurl the true against the false, and it doth break its head and lo! it vanisheth. And yours will be woe for that which ye ascribe (unto Him).
SHAKIR: Nay! We cast the truth against the falsehood, so that it breaks its head, and lo! it vanishes; and woe to you for what you describe;

 

[Zarvan]

Thanks for the effort, could you add the Arabic text as well plz?

Why don't you take out time and read it yourself Sir

Deobandi pathans and salafis get along that well?
If you knew the least bit about what you're saying, even arabs don't say salam3leikum, there are many alternatives, not even an idiot will call that arabism. I know you're just trying to score brownie points for you radical types but remember: YUSUFALI: Nay, We hurl the Truth against falsehood, and it knocks out its brain, and behold, falsehood doth perish! Ah! woe be to you for the (false) things ye ascribe (to Us).
PICKTHAL: Nay, but We hurl the true against the false, and it doth break its head and lo! it vanisheth. And yours will be woe for that which ye ascribe (unto Him).
SHAKIR: Nay! We cast the truth against the falsehood, so that it breaks its head, and lo! it vanishes; and woe to you for what you describe;

Mr their is only one Islam no different versions and is complete and to know study the sources Quran and Hadees

 

[Uchiha]

Hadiths are world of HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW and ALLAH has said HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW doesn't speak from himself what ever ALLAH tells him he speaks so you have to trust Hadees and you can't follow most orders of Quran without following Hadees


Mr as a Muslim we have to follow both Quran and Sunnah so if you are a Muslim you will have to follow both Kharijis are the who deny Hadees and HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW already told that they will be in hell

I agree, we have to follow the prophet SAW, but the bukhari person isn't the prophet aww that's too sad, now we can't stone adulterers and gays or kill blasphemers life would have been perfect for you if that bukhari or his writers (nouzubillah) were prophets; you'd love that wouldnt you?

 

[Zarvan]

I agree, we have to follow the prophet SAW, but the bukhari person isn't the prophet aww that's too sad, now we can't stone adulterers and gays or kill blasphemers life would have been perfect for you if that bukhari or his writers (nouzubillah) were prophets; you'd love that wouldnt you?

Bukhari collected the word of HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW book of bukhari doesn't contain his own words but Kharjis like you say these kind of things and HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW already gave the news for hell for the kharjis

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

I agree, we have to follow the prophet SAW, but the bukhari person isn't the prophet aww that's too sad, now we can't stone adulterers and gays or kill blasphemers life would have been perfect for you if that bukhari or his writers (nouzubillah) were prophets; you'd love that wouldnt you?

Honestly, you are making a fool of yourself here, you wouldn't know how to pray or the ablution without Hadithes, and Bukhari is the most recognized and respected Imam and his books are adopted by all Sunnah. So, if you don't believe in hadithes, I don't how you pray. The problem is not with Hadithes or Quraan but rather with Zarvan and his understanding of them.

 

[Xestan]

This amount of BS by some of the members here forced me to jump in. This thread was about something else, not discussing Blasphemy law. Mods, are you guys sleeping? 8 pages of off-topic posts. Disgusting.

Now, Zarvan and other guys, especially BLACKEAGLE, cut it for now. I'm asking you guys 'cause you're debating with positive approach and not posting **** and trying hard to prove that Islam is a religion of fanatics, etc. We, here on PDF have no shortage of such people, especially people with a Pakistani flag below their names.

I fully support blasphemy law, it's according to the Qur'an and Sunnah, before any research into this matter, people judge to conclusions, sorry guys, but this is indeed proved to be a purely ISLAMIC law. No second thought about that. There are many authentic hadith from Sunan Abi Daud and other books which suggest us the punishment for a blasphemer.

Why does Saudi Arabia practices captial punishment for blasphemers? Why does Iran do that? Try going into deep with this matter whoever is serious to know the reality. THe blasphemy law is indeed being misused and Pakistan's Islamic Ideology Council has presented this draft to the government to pass a law which applies the capital punishment for anyone proved to be falsely accusing someone of blasphemy. This can be a good step forward. About Blasphemy law, it's not going anywhere, masses in Pakistan support it and no one in the parliament can dare to change it. Public opinion is the key here.

And rather than praising this good act by these Mullahs we are fighting over on non-issue again. Some liberal fascists are too blind to see this. Yes, Mullahs are out there SUPPORTING that lil' christian girl. Appreciate it!

 

[Uchiha]

Bukhari collected the word of HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW book of bukhari doesn't contain his own words but Kharjis like you say these kind of things and HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW already gave the news for hell for the kharjis

Those who deny the Quran like you, will be punished because you deny Allah's word(I'm not sure, maybe you'll be forgiven for being insane?). While I am simply mistrustful of the revelations attributed to the Prophet SAW - obviously I follow Allah and can never go wrong as long as Allah SWT is guiding me.
But you on the other hand, just following your barbaric whims should see the truth of the Quran

Honestly, you are making a fool of yourself here, you wouldn't know how to pray or the ablution without Hadithes, and Bukhari is the most recognized and respected Imam and his books are adopted by all Sunnah. So, if you don't believe in hadithes, I don't how you pray. The problem is not with Hadithes or Quraan but rather with Zarvan and his understanding of them.

I follow the harmless hadith in bukhari
But I only have two differences, no matter how 'recognized and respected' a book is, if it deviates or goes against the Quran in the slightest, I'm not bound to follow it. Secondly any new non-Quranic laws or tales of the prophet SAW that insult his character any hadith introduces is false.
I don't comletely saw that all historical accounts are false, no, but if it's goes against the above two conditions then I'm against it

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

Those who deny the Quran like you, will be punished because you deny Allah's word(I'm not sure, maybe you'll be forgiven for being insane?). While I am simply mistrustful of the revelations attributed to the Prophet SAW - obviously I follow Allah and can never go wrong as long as Allah SWT is guiding me.
But you on the other hand, just following your barbaric whims should see the truth of the Quran


I follow the harmless hadith in bukhari
But I only have two differences, no matter how 'recognized and respected' a book is, if it deviates or goes against the Quran in the slightest, I'm not bound to follow it. Secondly any new non-Quranic laws or tales of the prophet SAW that insult his character any hadith introduces is false.
I don't comletely saw that all historical accounts are false, no, but if it's goes against the above two conditions then I'm against it

Oh yah, then go make yourself a new religion that suits you.

@ Xestan

Allah forgives all sins no matter how blasphemous they are except Shirk. Yet, who are we to reject people who repent the blasphemous sins they committed?!

 

[forcetrip]

Sir go keep your so called humanity to yourself we have Islam and order of Islam is clear who ever will commit blashmey will have to be killed and if some one is falsely accused than the one who has accused him falsely have to be killed and that in public so these things stop



Hadiths are world of HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW and ALLAH has said HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW doesn't speak from himself what ever ALLAH tells him he speaks so you have to trust Hadees and you can't follow most orders of Quran without following Hadees


Mr as a Muslim we have to follow both Quran and Sunnah so if you are a Muslim you will have to follow both Kharijis are the who deny Hadees and HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW already told that they will be in hell

The only people you can kill in public are the ones weaker than you.. Thats what islam is all about according to you. Your kind will be purged by your offspring soon .. that is just the future you are afraid of and these are the reactions of how ignorant people react to a more powerful adversary made of facts. Wasnt your name "ibkay maar" ??

 

[Uchiha]

Oh yah, then go make yourself a new religion that suits you.

Nope, you and zarvan are doing that, worshipping bukhari and co.

 

[SQ8]

The only people you can kill in public are the ones weaker than you.. Thats what islam is all about according to you. Your kind will be purged by your offspring soon .. that is just the future you are afraid of and these are the reactions of how ignorant people react to a more powerful adversary made of facts. Wasnt your name "ibkay maar" ??

that is unfortunately the twisted philosophy being promoted.. which is not Islam.. rather some new religion.
The Quran and Sunnah are tools to be understood and used for good.. or misinterpreted and used for harm..
this and the incident is an example of the latter.

The Blasphemy law is incorrectly implemented.. It should be confined to those who make public statements and incite hatred.
not children.. but then we Pakistanis are generally happier to be baby killers than question a Mufti or Mullah on their sinful interpretation made into a law.

Nope, you and zarvan are doing that, worshipping bukhari and co.

They are not worshipping it, but rather defiling it due to their limited understanding..
After all.. a seeker with a limited Field of view will not be able to discern anything of use..
And may go after the flare.. rather than the actual target.. if you get my drift.

 

[Zarvan]

Those who deny the Quran like you, will be punished because you deny Allah's word(I'm not sure, maybe you'll be forgiven for being insane?). While I am simply mistrustful of the revelations attributed to the Prophet SAW - obviously I follow Allah and can never go wrong as long as Allah SWT is guiding me.
But you on the other hand, just following your barbaric whims should see the truth of the Quran


I follow the harmless hadith in bukhari
But I only have two differences, no matter how 'recognized and respected' a book is, if it deviates or goes against the Quran in the slightest, I'm not bound to follow it. Secondly any new non-Quranic laws or tales of the prophet SAW that insult his character any hadith introduces is false.
I don't comletely saw that all historical accounts are false, no, but if it's goes against the above two conditions then I'm against it

so you act like hypocrites who followed those orders of HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW which they liked and not those which they didn't liked and by the way according to Quran the hypocrites will be in worst position than kafirs

 

[Ahmad]

Why don't you take out time and read it yourself Sir

i want to also have it online with me and the exact Aya, so please give me the text. I am not questioning the text, but i wan6t to know which one it is.