What's new

Double-edged sword of 'surrendered' Taliban in Waziristan

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Double-edged sword of 'surrendered' Taliban in Waziristan


IHSANULLAH TIPU MEHSUD

August 03, 2020 13:58


Short Url
https://arab.news/m7b4w

Fear has engulfed South and North Waziristan tribal districts with a rampant influx of militants in the area in recent months. Packs of Taliban fighters have been sneaking into Pakistan’s northwestern region from hideouts just across the Afghan border. Pakistani officials and local residents worry that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan following a peace deal signed by the US and Taliban in February will further embolden the Pakistani Taliban's return to the region.
Upon the successful culmination of the Pakistani army's operation Zarb-e-Azb in 2016 to eradicate the last vestiges of Taliban-led militancy in North Waziristan, an opaque amnesty scheme was launched that sought surrender of militants in a bid to reintegrate and rehabilitate them.
Hundreds of militants have so far reportedly turned themselves in to security forces under the amnesty scheme. However, the policy has received immense criticism from local residents. One of the senior Taliban commanders even roams around freely in Islamabad after availing the amnesty offer. It seems that the "good Taliban" and "bad Taliban" narrative is no longer valid. The "good" ones were replaced by the "surrendered."

Peace in tribal areas is very hard-earned. To prevent the resurgence of militancy in the region, a comprehensive national policy incorporating security, social, political and economic factors, needs to be devised with the consent of Parliament, local tribal jirgas and civil society.

Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud

The term "good Taliban" was used for those militants, mainly active in Afghanistan, who posed little threat to Pakistan. The clandestine nature of their surrender scheme reinforces the fear that it may open another can of worms, inadvertently complicating the already fragile law and order situation in the region, which has been experiencing a surge in attacks against security forces and local residents. Dozens of civilians and personnel have been killed in the assaults.
The escalation has triggered massive protests with locals blaming the security forces for failing to prevent the attacks despite their stifling presence in the region. Residents link the assaults with the return of the "surrendered" Taliban — the people because of whom they were forced to flee their homes during military operations in the region.
For conflict resolution and peace-building efforts, partaking of local stakeholders is necessary for durable peace, but ironically the government’s "surrender” policy, which sidelines the indigenous Pashtun institution of jirga, only causes deep alienation and fear of a possible return of organized militancy.
The amnesty policy also lacks due legal standing. It can be challenged by a victim in any court of law. It applies to and treats equally all militants, no matter if they are young brainwashed fighters or dreaded commanders involved in acts of terrorism.
Many precedents exist both regionally and globally where countries have granted amnesty to armed actors on condition of renouncing violence. But all these schemes were made public before implementation, subjected to public debate and transparently included in national security policies.

An amnesty process initiated five years ago by the Balochistan government for Baloch separatists offered financial incentives. The scheme has been successful and contributed significantly to curbing ethno-national militancy in the province.
Many senior military officials, who have served in Pakistan's regions bordering Afghanistan argue that the amnesty approach seeking to mainstream the Pakistani Taliban will lure the militants who are currently based in Afghanistan, into eschewing arms and violence. But peace in tribal areas is very hard-earned. To prevent the resurgence of militancy in the region, a comprehensive national policy incorporating security, social, political and economic factors, needs to be devised with the consent of Parliament, local tribal jirgas and civil society.

Return of former militants without their public oath of allegiance and loyalty to Pakistan's Constitution can worsen the state of affairs in the region.

- Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud is an Islamabad-based journalist who extensively covers security issues in Afghanistan and Pakistan for international media. Twitter: @Ihsantipu

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view

https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1714011
 
.
A public oath of allegiance will definitely keep them from creating sleeper cells once our guard is down...
 
.
Double-edged sword of 'surrendered' Taliban in Waziristan


IHSANULLAH TIPU MEHSUD

August 03, 2020 13:58


Short Url
https://arab.news/m7b4w

Fear has engulfed South and North Waziristan tribal districts with a rampant influx of militants in the area in recent months. Packs of Taliban fighters have been sneaking into Pakistan’s northwestern region from hideouts just across the Afghan border. Pakistani officials and local residents worry that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan following a peace deal signed by the US and Taliban in February will further embolden the Pakistani Taliban's return to the region.
Upon the successful culmination of the Pakistani army's operation Zarb-e-Azb in 2016 to eradicate the last vestiges of Taliban-led militancy in North Waziristan, an opaque amnesty scheme was launched that sought surrender of militants in a bid to reintegrate and rehabilitate them.
Hundreds of militants have so far reportedly turned themselves in to security forces under the amnesty scheme. However, the policy has received immense criticism from local residents. One of the senior Taliban commanders even roams around freely in Islamabad after availing the amnesty offer. It seems that the "good Taliban" and "bad Taliban" narrative is no longer valid. The "good" ones were replaced by the "surrendered."

Peace in tribal areas is very hard-earned. To prevent the resurgence of militancy in the region, a comprehensive national policy incorporating security, social, political and economic factors, needs to be devised with the consent of Parliament, local tribal jirgas and civil society.

Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud

The term "good Taliban" was used for those militants, mainly active in Afghanistan, who posed little threat to Pakistan. The clandestine nature of their surrender scheme reinforces the fear that it may open another can of worms, inadvertently complicating the already fragile law and order situation in the region, which has been experiencing a surge in attacks against security forces and local residents. Dozens of civilians and personnel have been killed in the assaults.
The escalation has triggered massive protests with locals blaming the security forces for failing to prevent the attacks despite their stifling presence in the region. Residents link the assaults with the return of the "surrendered" Taliban — the people because of whom they were forced to flee their homes during military operations in the region.
For conflict resolution and peace-building efforts, partaking of local stakeholders is necessary for durable peace, but ironically the government’s "surrender” policy, which sidelines the indigenous Pashtun institution of jirga, only causes deep alienation and fear of a possible return of organized militancy.
The amnesty policy also lacks due legal standing. It can be challenged by a victim in any court of law. It applies to and treats equally all militants, no matter if they are young brainwashed fighters or dreaded commanders involved in acts of terrorism.
Many precedents exist both regionally and globally where countries have granted amnesty to armed actors on condition of renouncing violence. But all these schemes were made public before implementation, subjected to public debate and transparently included in national security policies.

An amnesty process initiated five years ago by the Balochistan government for Baloch separatists offered financial incentives. The scheme has been successful and contributed significantly to curbing ethno-national militancy in the province.
Many senior military officials, who have served in Pakistan's regions bordering Afghanistan argue that the amnesty approach seeking to mainstream the Pakistani Taliban will lure the militants who are currently based in Afghanistan, into eschewing arms and violence. But peace in tribal areas is very hard-earned. To prevent the resurgence of militancy in the region, a comprehensive national policy incorporating security, social, political and economic factors, needs to be devised with the consent of Parliament, local tribal jirgas and civil society.

Return of former militants without their public oath of allegiance and loyalty to Pakistan's Constitution can worsen the state of affairs in the region.

- Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud is an Islamabad-based journalist who extensively covers security issues in Afghanistan and Pakistan for international media. Twitter: @Ihsantipu

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view

https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1714011

He didnt even knows that Taliban and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are entirely different organizations. Poor reporting.
 
.
He didnt even knows that Taliban and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are entirely different organizations. Poor reporting.

We didn't learn anything did we? Looks like 2008-2015 era was not enough.

TTP and taliban are same shit in different bottle, the sooner we accept this fact the better it will be for all.
 
.
We didn't learn anything did we? Looks like 2008-2015 era was not enough.

TTP and taliban are same shit in different bottle, the sooner we accept this fact the better it will be for all.

If you dont know anything about on ground situation then I cant help you. Taliban was never a terrorist organization. It was a legitimate government of Afghanistan at the time of 2001 and has no link or relationship with the TTP that was created in Swat by Masood group.

Taliban was ally of Pakistan before 2001 and despite being in alliance we choose to deceive them for USA. We realized the mistake and finally started treating them separately thats why you see Quetta Shura and other Tabliban having realtionship with Pakistani establishment. whereas at the same time operation was being done against TTP in Swat and waziristan.

Your statement can be compared that if some random atheist political party in Afghanistan name itself as BJP then you will label them Hindu extremist and anti Muslim party?
 
.
If you dont know anything about on ground situation then I cant help you. Taliban was never a terrorist organization. It was a legitimate government of Afghanistan at the time of 2001 and has no link or relationship with the TTP that was created in Swat by Masood group.

Taliban was ally of Pakistan before 2001 and despite being in alliance we choose to deceive them for USA. We realized the mistake and finally started treating them separately thats why you see Quetta Shura and other Tabliban having realtionship with Pakistani establishment. whereas at the same time operation was being done against TTP in Swat and waziristan.

Your statement can be compared that if some random atheist political party in Afghanistan name itself as BJP then you will label them Hindu extremist and anti Muslim party?
You are right, however, I don't agree with the policy of giving amnesty to TTP terrorists. They killed scores of Pakistanis incuding security forces. I don't know why they are being pardoned. I don't agree to pardoning the Baloch separatists too.

Anyone who has gone against the motherland just once in his life must not be freed. The least we can do is to put them behind bars forever.
 
.
If you dont know anything about on ground situation then I cant help you. Taliban was never a terrorist organization. It was a legitimate government of Afghanistan at the time of 2001 and has no link or relationship with the TTP that was created in Swat by Masood group.

Taliban was ally of Pakistan before 2001 and despite being in alliance we choose to deceive them for USA. We realized the mistake and finally started treating them separately thats why you see Quetta Shura and other Tabliban having realtionship with Pakistani establishment. whereas at the same time operation was being done against TTP in Swat and waziristan.

Your statement can be compared that if some random atheist political party in Afghanistan name itself as BJP then you will label them Hindu extremist and anti Muslim party?

You don't know ground situation. These extremist militants change sides on whim and who pay them more. ISIS in Afghanistan are basically made up of former taliban members.

Even so called good taliban continue to be terrorists who kill innocent Afghan people on daily basis. Problem with PTM/ANP ethnic nationalist types is they don't accept the fact that these terrorists are also pashtuns and pashtunwali and extremist culture in general is responsible for these monsters. Pakistan didn't create them, they always existed. Till the day they continue to blame others for evil found in them, nothing will change.
 
.
You are right, however, I don't agree with the policy of giving amnesty to TTP terrorists. They killed scores of Pakistanis incuding security forces. I don't know why they are being pardoned. I don't agree to pardoning the Baloch separatists too.

Anyone who has gone against the motherland just once in his life must not be freed. The least we can do is to put them behind bars forever.

Here I also agree with you on broader basis but we dont know the actual reasons why these decisions were made. If you read history this is not the first time compromises are being taken by those in power.

You also need to consider that we are surrounded by enemies and alot of world agencies are willing to pay tons of dollars to buy loyalties.

We can keep on fighting them till the last traitor or alternatively we can divide them and turn some of them on our side so that we can focus on the hard core ones.

Anyways, this is a difference in tactics and it is not always zero sum game. Both of us could be right at the same time. So lets agree to disagree.

However, we need to understand it is not the fire arm battle ground where we are loosing. Its the battle on economic background. Over adversary could not have recruit these youth who are just looking to earn the bread. We are unable to provide them jobs and our economy is weak. We need to work really hard in developing the economic well being of people of tribal areas and Baluchistan if we want to defeat terrorism for good.
 
.
You don't know ground situation. These extremist militants change sides on whim and who pay them more. ISIS in Afghanistan are basically made up of former taliban members.

Even so called good taliban continue to be terrorists who kill innocent Afghan people on daily basis. Problem with PTM/ANP ethnic nationalist types is they don't accept the fact that these terrorists are also pashtuns and pashtunwali and extremist culture in general is responsible for these monsters. Pakistan didn't create them, they always existed. Till the day they continue to blame others for evil found in them, nothing will change.

Bro, first of all if we talk about some organization then we should stick to the organization's philosophy and leadership. Action of deserters of Tabliban cant be blamed on Taliban otherwise in the larger picture TTP are Pakistanis themselves.

Secondly good Taliban or Taliban under leadership of Mullah Umar didnt kill innocent Pashtuns. Actually they have wide support among general population due to the most peaceful government established by them in decades between 1996 to 2001.

Contrary to the popular beleif, Taliban brought peace to Afghanistan after decade of civil war and it was not a Taliban only government but the actual cabinet comprised of representatives of different groups of Afghanistan except for northern alliance.

Regarding your claim that Pakistan didnt create them I partially agree, but you really need to read the unbiased history of establishment of Taliban in 1994 and grabing the government without any bloodshed due to all respected personality of Mullah Umar among people of Afghanistan.

The party is named Taliban because the people among the party were actually students of Mullah Umar and Mullah Umar had unchallenged reputation as a Qazi and man of justice even before creation of Taliban.

You really need to study about Mullah Umar only then you can understand Taliban of Mullah Umar were terrorist at all.
 
.
Bro, first of all if we talk about some organization then we should stick to the organization's philosophy and leadership. Action of deserters of Tabliban cant be blamed on Taliban otherwise in the larger picture TTP are Pakistanis themselves.

Secondly good Taliban or Taliban under leadership of Mullah Umar didnt kill innocent Pashtuns. Actually they have wide support among general population due to the most peaceful government established by them in decades between 1996 to 2001.

Contrary to the popular beleif, Taliban brought peace to Afghanistan after decade of civil war and it was not a Taliban only government but the actual cabinet comprised of representatives of different groups of Afghanistan except for northern alliance.

Regarding your claim that Pakistan didnt create them I partially agree, but you really need to read the unbiased history of establishment of Taliban in 1994 and grabing the government without any bloodshed due to all respected personality of Mullah Umar among people of Afghanistan.

The party is named Taliban because the people among the party were actually students of Mullah Umar and Mullah Umar had unchallenged reputation as a Qazi and man of justice even before creation of Taliban.

You really need to study about Mullah Umar only then you can understand Taliban of Mullah Umar were terrorist at all.

ISIS/TTP/ and good taliban all do same thing, kill as many innocent civilians as possible to blackmail state. Taliban came in to power by killing thousands tajiks, hazaras, so much for legitimate government. And you know what? Pakistan fully supported them and even armed them. In fact Pakistanis also drove tanks to kill tajiks and hazaras.

This student BS doesn't fly anymore.
 
. . .
ISIS/TTP/ and good taliban all do same thing, kill as many innocent civilians as possible to blackmail state. Taliban came in to power by killing thousands tajiks, hazaras, so much for legitimate government. And you know what? Pakistan fully supported them and even armed them. In fact Pakistanis also drove tanks to kill tajiks and hazaras.

This student BS doesn't fly anymore.
You have no basis for your claim.
 
. .
A public oath of allegiance will definitely keep them from creating sleeper cells once our guard is down...
Road signs to India would be best. After showing the Talibs the inhumane torture being suffered by the Muslims in India we need to help transport them to the Indian border.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom