A.P. Richelieu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 7,724
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
What I stated was not mean to belittle contribution of other states. But the sheer number of people USSR lost in WW2 and their subsequent assistance to the liberation movement around the world when they were also in the process of reconstruction should not also be unestimated.
In terms of battles against colonialism I am not very familiar of US contribution. All I would say US wanted to ensure they had their guys in power post colonial liberation , that is about it from Vietnam, Indonesia, Iran, Middle East and Africa and Latin America . Action undertaken was to serve US interest so it is understandable and I would not infer they blocked necessarily independence movement but they never encouraged or supported any independence movement.
I am sure all of Eastern and Central Europe enjoyed the "support" the Soviet Union
gave to liberation movements especially in Hungary 1956, and Prague 1968.
Warsaw 1944, when the Soviet Army halted, while Nazi Germany crushed the liberation
movement, and refused to let the Allies help them.
The Soviet Union supported Communist takeovers, nothing more.
The US while stopping colonialism, definitely wanted friendly governments everywhere,
and supported anti-communists with all methods.
The US stopped the joint British/French/Israeli plan to retake the Suez canal for starters.
From the Wiki on Colonialism:
Second Decolonization (1945–99)Edit
Main article: Decolonization
Anticolonialist movements had begun to gain momentum after the close of World War I, which had seen colonial troops fight alongside those of the metropole, and U.S. President Woodrow Wilson's speech on the Fourteen Points. However, it was not until the end of World War II that they fully mobilised. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1941 Atlantic Charter declared that the signatories would "respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live". Though Churchill subsequently claimed this applied only to those countries under Nazi occupation, rather than the British Empire, the words were not so easily retracted: for example, the legislative assembly of Britain's most important colony, India, passed a resolution stating that the Charter should apply to it too.
The Atlantic Charter is one of the more important documents obviously.
Last edited: