Does the PN need an aircraft carrier?

[Nav]

Here every body intrested in constructing or acquiring in Aircraft carrier's . IMO, PN should Develop its counter Measures , e.g Carrier Killer missile's , N.subs capabal of lunching multipurpose Missiles , guys its just not Aircraft Carrier , in A carrier battle group there r lot of support staff , FFG'S , destroyr's , Covertts , etc etc

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Yes - we do need one

Yes we also need carrier killers

Yes we need Naval Version of JF17 Thunder

Likely source of Aircraft carrier is US navy

 

[kashith]

yaar pakistan has hardly any sea coast,why does it needs a carrier?

 

[Imran Khan]

yaar pakistan has hardly any sea coast,why does it needs a carrier?

.at least we need one like thailand has Chakri Naruebet air craft carerr guys

 

[SpArK]

MAMOOOOOOOOOO were you live on moon pakistan has sea cost more then sea coast of thailand UK france all these has air craft carerrs.at least we need one like thailand has Chakri Naruebet air craft carerr guys

Im sorry sir . Your facts are a bit wrong

Coastline by kms

UK- 12,429 Kms
France-3,427 Kms
Thailand-3,219 Kms
Pakistan-1,046 Kms


List of countries by length of coastline - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[sparklingway]

Decide whether we have blue water ambitions first.

 

[Imran Khan]

Im sorry sir . Your facts are a bit wrong

Coastline by kms

UK- 12,429 Kms
France-3,427 Kms
Thailand-3,219 Kms
Pakistan-1,046 Kms


List of countries by length of coastline - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

very warm thanks bro i update my post

 

[Patriot]

Damn our coastline can be barely called coastline - It's too small compared to other nations.If only we had water on each side of the border we would have no problem with any other country.

 

[kashith]

very warm thanks bro i update my post

bhai i was saying it that since PN is defensive in nature it does not need an aircraft carrier,and to save its sea coast it has enough submarines and p3c orions as well.
dont take it in the wrong manner

 

[Penguin]

Im sorry sir . Your facts are a bit wrong

Coastline by kms

UK- 12,429 Kms
France-3,427 Kms
Thailand-3,219 Kms
Pakistan-1,046 Kms


List of countries by length of coastline - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interesting. If coastline were a criterion/key factor in justifying carrier ownership, Russia (#4) would be more justified to have several than Japan (#6) and USA (#9). China (#11) less than the USA but more than UK (#13). Likewise, Brazil (#16) would be more justified than India (#19). More so than Spain (#27), Argentina (#25) should get back into the carrier business. France (#35) has just slightly more coastline than Thailand (#26), yet has a nuclear carrier versus the little Thai pocket carrier. South Korea (#52) should wait with obtaining a carrier, at least untill North Korea (#46) gets one. Pakistan (#82) has more right to build one than the Netherlands (#110) but clearly less to than India.

 

[sodocpkgj]

for fucks sake what pakistan needs is SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, JOBS, GETTING RID OF POVERTY not ******* aircraft carriers.... unless any of you wanna pay for it? exactly did'nt think so and i think its stupid to justify inducting an ACC for war on terror cause the wars in north and the sea is in south.... unless they wanna operate it from Nallas and sewrage lines.

 

[Imran Khan]

bhai i was saying it that since PN is defensive in nature it does not need an aircraft carrier,and to save its sea coast it has enough submarines and p3c orions as well.
dont take it in the wrong manner

agree i think subs are much important but you know thai oprate smallest AC of world

 

[Jigs]

Interesting we have a bigger coastline then India. Still it wouldn't make sense as carriers are for long range force projection. Not to patrol your coast and hang out in your waters.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

for fucks sake what pakistan needs is SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, JOBS, GETTING RID OF POVERTY not ******* aircraft carriers.... unless any of you wanna pay for it? exactly did'nt think so and i think its stupid to justify inducting an ACC for war on terror cause the wars in north and the sea is in south.... unless they wanna operate it from Nallas and sewrage lines.

Pay your taxes , we have enough schools and educated class in cities Carrier is for national defence, schools don't protect you once enemy is flying Sukhoi on your airspace - launchd from aircraft carriers

 

[jha]

for fucks sake what pakistan needs is SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, JOBS, GETTING RID OF POVERTY not ******* aircraft carriers.... unless any of you wanna pay for it? exactly did'nt think so and i think its stupid to justify inducting an ACC for war on terror cause the wars in north and the sea is in south.... unless they wanna operate it from Nallas and sewrage lines.

A little use of ** is a better way imo...but it is your choice..