What's new

Does Pakistan have any war time planning ?

Let me assure that MO(military Operations) directorate in GHQ is not sleeping.
-------------------------

I thank you for a satisfying and clarifying answer. It is best to stay ahead of India's Planning

I am sure that India's new friend’s supervise India in new techniques and strategies how to deal with different situations . India's new friends also offer joint exercises and equipment that increase India's capabilities against Pakistan.

In Kargil war , Israel rushed to India to provide India with latest weapon systems to target pakistani army as drones, laser guided weapons and other systems. Also some other countries are helping it against Pakistan, either with weapon, intelligence or to destabilize its internal securityas in Karachi or Balochistan. Elements as Achakzai, MQM and Aswand wali Khan are also assets of foreign powers

To improve internal security of Pakistan, its very important to have efficient border management along all Pakistans borders, and send all Afghans back to Afghanistan, as they openly express support for India and hatered for Pakistan, despite 40 years off great support and shelter. Afghani NDS will surly work for Indian RAW.

India uses peacetime to make preparations, building strategic roads, filling up all kinds of stocks, optimize plans, doing military exercises, gathers intelligence alone or with their new friends.
 
.
@John Reese

What are you trying to show me with these pictures? These guys are special forces not the average Indian Soldier; they are nothing but manikins used only for show.

Let me show you ACTUAL photos; of Pakistani personnel in active duty.

3179c2c7b55e467db684efa41bdaa77e.png

xcrXIl1.jpg

AQLgKpc.jpg

2c1ecf02b41e4a918f93cb287cfc6e9a.png




Here: even our paramilitary forces are better equipped.
8c9c659c6ffc421796b9c09c702f15e0.png


These guys here are what you call real special forces; with actual equipment.
06f05fe12eae46a48f3bb5be83da2642.png

sh12op2.jpg
 
. . .
@John Reese

What are you trying to show me with these pictures? These guys are special forces not the average Indian Soldier; they are nothing but manikins used only for show.

Let me show you ACTUAL photos; of Pakistani personnel in active duty.

3179c2c7b55e467db684efa41bdaa77e.png

xcrXIl1.jpg

AQLgKpc.jpg

2c1ecf02b41e4a918f93cb287cfc6e9a.png




Here: even our paramilitary forces are better equipped.
8c9c659c6ffc421796b9c09c702f15e0.png


These guys here are what you call real special forces; with actual equipment.
06f05fe12eae46a48f3bb5be83da2642.png

sh12op2.jpg
Again you started Of topic Flame bait Create Separate thread if you want debate

I already Requested @WebMaster clean Offtopic post

These guys here are what you call real special forces; with actual equipment.
This nothing Special Our Central Paramilitary SF Enjoys Same Weapons in larger Quantities
Again i request Start Separate Thread for rebuttal
CRPF
lwfPlc1.jpg
 
.
Very true. Pakistan has revised its Nuclear doctrine from being the last resort option to being the first option. Pakistan is going to start the next war in Kashmir with a nuclear bang.


The Pink Flamingo on the Subcontinent: Nuclear War between India and Pakistan
David Barno and Nora Bensahel
November 3, 2015






A “
pink flamingo” is the term recently coined by Frank Hoffman to describe predictable but ignored events that can yield disastrous results. Hoffman argues that these situations are fully visible, but almost entirely ignored by policymakers. Pink flamingos stand in stark contrast to “black swans” — the unpredictable, even unforeseeable shocks whose outcomes may be entirely unknown.

The tense nuclear standoff between India and Pakistan may be the most dangerous pink flamingo in today’s world.

The Indian subcontinent — home to both India and Pakistan — remains among the most dangerous corners of the world, and continues to pose a deep threat to global stability and the current world order. Their 1,800-mile border is the only place in the world where two hostile, nuclear-armed states face off every day. And the risk of nuclear conflict has only continued to rise in the past few years, to the point that it is now a very real possibility.

India and Pakistan have fought three wars since they gained independence in 1947, including one that ended in 1971 with Pakistan losing approximately half its territory (present-day Bangladesh). Today, the disputed Line of Control that divides the disputed Kashmir region remains a particularly tense flash point. Both the
Kargil crisis of 1999 and the 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament by Pakistan-supported militants brought both nations once again to the brink of war. Yet unlike earlier major wars, these two crises occurred after both India and Pakistan became nuclear-armed states. Quick and forceful diplomatic intervention played a pivotal role in preventing a larger conflict from erupting during each crisis.

These stakes are even higher, and more dangerous, today.

Since 2004, India has been developing a new military doctrine called
Cold Start, a limited war option designed largely to deter Islamabad from sponsoring irregular attacks against New Delhi. It involves rapid conventional retaliation after any such attack, launching a number of quick armored assaults into Pakistan and rapidly securing limited objectives that hypothetically remain below Pakistan’s nuclear threshold. In accordance with this doctrine, the Indian military is meant to mobilize half a million troops in less than 72 hours.

Beyond the risks of runaway nuclear escalation, Pakistan’s growing tactical nuclear weapons program also brings a wide array of other
destabilizing characteristics to this already unstable mix: the necessity to position these short-range weapons close to the border with India, making them more vulnerable to interdiction; the need to move and disperse these weapons during a crisis, thereby signaling a nuclear threat; and the prospects of local


A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would dramatically alter the world as we know it. The damage from fallout and blast, the deaths of potentially millions, and the environmental devastation of even a few weapons detonations would suddenly dwarf any other global problem. There are no shortage of conflicts and crises around the world demanding the attention of policymakers in Washington and other capitals. But the stakes of a war between two of the world’s most hostile nuclear powers deserves attention before the next inevitable flare-up. Taking a series of modest steps now to try to avert the worst outcomes from this dangerous pink flamingo hiding in plain sight is an investment well worth making.

-------------------------------------

First of all Indians are so proud of 1971 war,
Pakistan could easily divided India in many smaller states in 1962 Indo-China war, when India was in simmilar situastion as pakistan in 1971, but Pakistan showed greatness by not striking when India was most vulnerable, but history has taught us that Indians do not let these opportunities go when they get simmilar oppertunities.

Its no doubt about it that it was the blounder of the centuary by Pakistan by not launching attack on India in 1962 and liberate Jammu & Kashmir. India did attack Pakistan in 1971 when Pakistan had internal security issues.

Pakistani armed forces must not let opportunities as these let go in future.

2.
If India launches a massive attack on Pakistan under its cold start doctrine on one or more locations at the border , then we must have it clear how we should react quickly to clear away as many Indians from our territory. Indians are so petty, you can expect anything from them. Then Pakistan has to use a weapons before Indian soliders enter into Pakistani territory and harass pakistanies. As long as the war is on borders its ok, but if Indians pentrate far inside pakistani side of the border then Pak army must launch attack.

Pakistan must also understand thats India's new friends will increase its capabilities in advance.
 
. . .
Economy is least of priority...when enemy has crossed the border...there are other ways to get "help". Anyways...Pakistan has and will keep india at it toes.

Look at the history...they have kept india in defensive mode for the last 60+ ...only thing i love about them.
:oops:

None of them were offensive wars from india...maybe few battles were...but not the war itself. Stop trying to take away pakistan credit.

If pak was what is india today...they would have destroyed you 10 times by now. India doesn't have the strength...ballzz...its a weak nation and will remain so for another few centuries at least.

Shame on India ! India cannot handle a 5 times smaller nation . :bunny: . On the other hand we are proud that we have been fighting with a 5 times Larger enemy with limited resources and also defeated them at many occasions . :-)
 
.
Long Period only Sustain Large indian Deployment And this time There is No East Pakistan
India can create its Storm Trooping from afghan side Paratroopers And Strike Brigades

  1. India has Large No of Battalions Of Special forces
  2. Large Forces of paratroopers and Mountain Divisions
  3. Large Resource and Logistics
Without Nuclear option It will Be Chaos for Pakistan
--------------------------------------------

If Afghanistan or other countries let Indian army use its soil against Pakistan , we will deal with those countries either during Indo-Pak war or after the Indo-Pak war.

Indians should not be to be so confiden about its capabilities. It is reality, no Bollywood movie where 3 Indians defeats 20000 Pakistani soliders and only indians shot at target and no pakistani can shot at target .

Indians will struggle and it will be caos on Indian side when Pakistani forces launch attack.

If you think India will manage 1971 situation again, dream on.It would be the same as if Pakistan attacked India under Indo-Sino War in 1962. Which we should have done, it was the greatest blounder of the century by Pak not to do it.

If Pakistan armed forces had attacked India during 1962 war , it would not have been much left of today's India. Indian army knows that very well.
 
.
If i dont know what i am doing most of the times, how can my enemy??

Gen mcarthur
 
.
That wasn't a war at all; it was a small-scale insurgency which involved less than 3000-5000 Pakistani soldiers. In an actual war; you'd be facing 650,000 Pakistani Soldiers spanning over 2000 KM


Budget my ###; have you seen the average Indian soldier? I'd say even Ethiopian soldiers looks better armed.


Only in 1971; when we were at our weakest moment; times have changed - meanwhile your soldiers still use the same equipment from 1971.


There is so such thing as an Afghan. Afghanistan is confused and divided with each ethnic group having contradicting loyalties.


The hell does that have to do with war-time planning?
---------
India can not be proud of their achievement during the 1971 war, Pakistan had the capacity do slice India up during Sino-Indo war in 1962. Which was incredibly huge mistake by Gen Ayub Khan.

Again you started Of topic Flame bait Create Separate thread if you want debate

I already Requested @WebMaster clean Offtopic post


This nothing Special Our Central Paramilitary SF Enjoys Same Weapons in larger Quantities
Again i request Start Separate Thread for rebuttal
CRPF
lwfPlc1.jpg
I could easily beat all those up in one to one fight
 
.
If Afghanistan or other countries let Indian army use its soil against Pakistan , we will deal with those countries either during Indo-Pak war or after the Indo-Pak war.

Indians should not be to be so confiden about its capabilities. It is reality, no Bollywood movie where 3 Indians defeats 20000 Pakistani soliders and only indians shot at target and no pakistani can shot at target .
Who said We use Their Soil Afghan Army ,TTP,BLAis are best assets
ndians will struggle and it will be caos on Indian side when Pakistani forces launch attack.

If you think India will manage 1971 situation again, dream on.It would be the same as if Pakistan attacked India under Indo-Sino War in 1962. Which we should have done, it was the greatest blounder of the century by Pak not to do it
Pakistan was Warned by USA

Also You are no in capability No If but here
If Pakistan armed forces had attacked India during 1962 war , it would not have been much left of today's India. Indian army knows that very well.
1962 war was Limited war in ladakh are only 10,000 soldiers were Deployed read about 1967 Sikkim It was butchery
 
.
In Actual war yo will Face 2 Million India Troops

Afghan Army Is Not Ethnic Group Its Military Force Remember Doval word " We will Fight Pakistan Till Last Afghan & Baloch"

If any provocation from Afghanistan side during Indo-Pak war, we will take care off them.
 
.
I could easily beat all those up in one to one fight
In your Dream child they are COBRA SF Master Of guerilla & Jungle warfare Trained In Counter-Insurgency and Jungle Warfare School (CIJWS) one the Best school in jungle war fare in the Known World
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-Insurgency_and_Jungle_Warfare_School_(India)

PS: one day i kill Seal Team Six Guy with My Pillow :agree:

If any provocation from Afghanistan side during Indo-Pak war, we will take care off them.
Talk is not Cheap Just Tell be How do you Tackle 7 Lakh Troops + Paramilitary in J& K alone What is the Active Strength Of pakistan army
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom