Does Bangladesh export to Israel?

[Centaur]

What the hell has India got anything to do with it.

Israel recognised BD in 1971, it was one of the first countries to do so. It did so as a means of weaking the muslims. At that point Pakistan would have been the largest Muslim country in the world population wise and its breakup was obviously a welcome news for the Zionist entity.

BD did not reciprocate the gesture in 1971. Our position is following equitable settlement between the Jews and Palestinians BD would be happy to develop normal relationship.

There was no bilateral relationship between Pakistan and Israel right ? Pakistan was in USA block and India was in former Soviet block.

From the beginning Israel was seeking Muslim recognization right ?as a part of this campaign camp David Accord was signed in 1978 right ?
Do you think that Israel is a utterly foolish country that will go against Pakistan when specially it (Israel) was seeking deplomacy with Muslim nations? Will USA let Israel do that in order to put Israel's entity under bigger threat for such a country that even didn't recognized as a separate country that time ?
Oh boy be realistic. If Pakistan or any Muslim countries would be a threat from Israel ,there was no benefit for Israel that is surrounded by hostile entities !
So there is no chance that Israel recognized (so called) Bangladesh that time ,that was not recognized by other countries .
Remember the first gulf war when Saddam Hussein was provoking Israel with scuds? Why senior bush stopped Israel when it was about to deploy airforce against iraq ?

Because if Israel interfare , Muslim countries may break the unity ( with USA and it's joint force ).
And this was also the policy of Iraq and that's why it used scuds against Israel who was not the part of this qalition army .
So if Israel recognized Bangladesh that time, it would never harmed Pakistan ,but it would be beneficial for Pakistan as others would never recognize Bangladesh by claiming that 1971 war (so called Bangladesh freedom war) was Zionist propaganda .
If Israel wanted a broken Muslim nation, there is no way they can directly support it , as common enemy always unify peoples.

 

[mb444]

There was no bilateral relationship between Pakistan and Israel right ? Pakistan was in USA block and India was in former Soviet block.

From the beginning Israel was seeking Muslim recognization right ?as a part of this campaign camp David Accord was signed in 1978 right ?
Do you think that Israel is a utterly foolish country that will go against Pakistan when specially it (Israel) was seeking deplomacy with Muslim nations? Will USA let Israel do that in order to put Israel's entity under bigger threat for such a country that even didn't recognized as a separate country that time ?
Oh boy be realistic. If Pakistan or any Muslim countries would be a threat from Israel ,there was no benefit for Israel that is surrounded by hostile entities !
So there is no chance that Israel recognized (so called) Bangladesh that time ,that was not recognized by other countries .
Remember the first gulf war when Saddam Hussein was provoking Israel with scuds? Why senior bush stopped Israel when it was about to deploy airforce against iraq ?

Because if Israel interfare , Muslim countries may break the unity ( with USA and it's joint force ).
And this was also the policy of Iraq and that's why it used scuds against Israel who was not the part of this qalition army .
So if Israel recognized Bangladesh that time, it would never harmed Pakistan ,but it would be beneficial for Pakistan as others would never recognize Bangladesh by claiming that 1971 war (so called Bangladesh freedom war) was Zionist propaganda .
If Israel wanted a broken Muslim nation, there is no way they can directly support it , as common enemy always unify peoples.

I am quoting matters of fact whilst you are going off on a tangent .


Wiki link but it is a factual history of what happened following BD independence.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh–Israel_relations

 

[Nilgiri]

One thing really puzzled me and that is how Israel can recognize Bangladesh in 1972 or even in 1971 where there was no formal relationship with India and Israel before 1992? Can anyone answer this question ?

Whether India and Israel has embassy level relationship has no bearing on Israel forwarding unilateral recognition to another country.

India - Israel relationship was established btw at most levels (embassy is not really indicative of it) at the founding of the jewish state in 1948/49. The embassy level was just icing on existing cake.

Most of the BD here btw do not fundamentally understand that Israel played a role in BD liberation as well for example by technical, training and intelligence assistance to Indira Gandhi govt + specific Indian military units, in somewhat stark opposition to the Nixon administration too (in fact one can say the jewish lobby in US bypassed Nixon by using Israel...and also harnessed the small capital Nixon himself wanted to use to smooth things over with India long term). Not to mention the massive jew funded and authored papers of the supposed genocide/atrocities by Pakistan.

But ummahism stops BD from developing it further on pragmatic terms, its BD loss. Its kind of funny when you see how ummah treats Bangladesh overall too. BD people seem to be suckers for punishment of their own doing and inability to truly stand up and chart their own destiny.

 

[Centaur]

I am quoting matters of fact whilst you are going off on a tangent .


Wiki link but it is a factual history of what happened following BD independence.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh–Israel_relations

Surely I read the link before. Just I failed to make you understand what I wanted to say and you suggested a very common Wikipedia link that anyone can find very easily.

 

[mb444]

Surely I read the link before. Just I failed to make you understand what I wanted to say and you suggested a very common Wikipedia link that anyone can find very easily.

You are entirely correct I have no idea what you are possibly trying to say. I am simply going by what you have written.

Israeli may seek legitimacy but it’s primary goal is domination. Your perspective runs counter to events.

If you maintain a position that Israel did not recognise BD in early 1972 there really is not much I can add.

 

[Centaur]

You are entirely correct I have no idea what you are possibly trying to say. I am simply going by what you have written.

Israeli may seek legitimacy but it’s primary goal is domination. Your perspective runs counter to events.

If you maintain a position that Israel did not recognise BD in early 1972 there really is not much I can add.

@Nilgiri already wrote a good response. I was seeking for a good and informative response before .
However what make you think that bolded part ( In quotation)I have no idea.I have asked why Israel would do such thing since Pakistan was ally of usa and they was on pakistan's side ,and USA is the biggest ally of Israel .and also why USA didn't stop Israel I was wondering about it!

So why Israel went against usa (not only in1972 but also in 1971 too!),it was only a simple question and I have asked it only for a rational and informative explanation ,thanks
@mb444

 

[mb444]

@Nilgiri already wrote a good response. I was seeking for a good and informative response before .
However what make you think that bolded part ( In quotation)I have no idea.I have asked why Israel would do such thing since Pakistan was ally of usa and they was on pakistan's side ,and USA is the biggest ally of Israel .and also why USA didn't stop Israel I was wondering about it!

So why Israel went against usa (not only in1972 but also in 1971 too!),it was only a simple question and I have asked it only for a rational and informative explanation ,thanks
@mb444

Israel continuously goes against US interest. I can not respond to you as I do not fully understand your question.

Outside of turkey no Muslim country are aligned to the US. Nominally being pro west hardly guarantees any protection.

I think your question in predicated on the assumption that US is the senior partner in the US-Israel relationship. It is not. US could not even execute pollard .... an Israeli spy but rather had to jail him.

 

[idune]

Shouldn't a shia country like Iran be destroyed by true Muslims?

That is the kind of thinking only awami league "ho.." can come up with.

 

[bluesky]

Shouldn't a shia country like Iran be destroyed by true Muslims?

Can someone define what is true Islam and who are true Muslims? Every Muslim will bring out his own definitions if asked. But, it is only Allah who has the Authority to decide on these subjects. Instead of looking at others a Muslim should only concentrate on himself and let others do whatever they like. Allah has not delegated any of His power to the Muslims. A mortal being is not supposed to copy an Act of God, like who is a good and who is not a good Muslim. Because we watch and criticize others, therefore, the Muslims keep on fighting each other.

 

[DavidSling]

Israel continuously goes against US interest. I can not respond to you as I do not fully understand your question.

Outside of turkey no Muslim country are aligned to the US. Nominally being pro west hardly guarantees any protection.

I think your question in predicated on the assumption that US is the senior partner in the US-Israel relationship. It is not. US could not even execute pollard .... an Israeli spy but rather had to jail him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_imprisoned_spies
You're full of bull.
As you can see I just linked a table of imprisoned spied in the U.S, out of which none has been executed.
Which makes ur whole arguement invalid

 

[bdslph]

propaganda video i guess and articles
we cannot do that