"Are you not aware that American bases in East Asia have been the subject of public protests because of the rape of local teenage girls?"
Of course I am. Do you presume that my government and military are unconcerned? Do you believe that we don't deeply regret this criminal behavior where it occurs? Do you suggest that we don't prosecute these accused nor punish those convicted? Do you argue that our laws are inadequate to do so or that our institutions are unprepared to act upon them?
If not, then you'll understand that we are hardly the first nor the worst, and that includes in Thailand, Phillipines or S. Korea. You act ignorant of Japan's institutional crimes of rape in S. Korea and elsewhere- to include Okinawa. Why? You ignore the French legacy of colonialism in indochine and it's own perverse cultural twists. Why? You ignore Siam's own national fascination with sex that far exceeds the origins of the United States. Why? You ignore Europe's own fascinations offered to our soldiers and only point to your impoverished Asian brothers though connecting us with some sin of economic and sexual enslavement.
Finally, I had to laugh that you've decided that the sex tours so popular among men in your part of the world is a legacy of our soldiers. If so thirty-seven years after we left southeast asia then, clearly, we helped identify one of the more enduring industries to date.
Our soldiers are no saints. Then again, most soldiers aren't. Comes with the age, job requirements, testosterone, and weapons. On the whole, I'm very satisfied with their sense of discipline and duty when deployed. More so now, frankly, than ever-especially in muslim nations.
So here my question...
WHAT'S YOUR POINT?
The reason for which I ask is that I'm trying to understand why you feel cause to single out my nation, particularly in light of your own cultural legacy of rape in Pakistan, it's inconsistant judicial remedy, and your military's own sorely-tainted past. I sure wouldn't.
We also know that the militants, both in Pakistan and Iraq/Afghanistan have used rape in a variety of circumstances as a political weapon. There are allegations now of an Iraqi woman, 51, who orchestrated the rapes of over 80 Iraqi women to sufficiently shame them into suicide bombings.
Consider it.
Has your nation and military suddenly emerged quietly into a new perspective of which I'm unaware? Most women's rights groups might disagree, if so. So, rhetorically, I'm at a loss to understand the purpose for this thread hijacking.
Can you help me better understand so that I might be fully and suitably forearmed for a real wing-dinger argument about war crimes and rapes and murders, blah, blah, blah...?
Thanks.