Would it be beneficial for kashmir?
According to this article, "The commander of the SNA militia "Sulayman Shah Brigades", Muhammed Abu Amsha, announced five days ago to members of his militia in the occupied city of Şiyê near Afrin that the Turkish state wanted to relocate some units to Kashmir."
Don't take article as truth as it is probably a propaganda piece but if it were true do you think it would be good?
Προς νέα σύγκρουση
www.pentapostagma.gr
Mods, please don't delete this thread. My thread is not based on the article. It is based on the question of whether or not Syrian mercenaries will be good for the Kashmir cause.
It's a Greek article. Don't take it seriously.
You can't just transfer a regiment from one region to another, specially a region like Kashmir whose borders are strongly controlled, and its territorial dynamics are extremely different to rugged and plain landscapes of western Syria.
Secondly, Turkey wouldn't do that, and doesn't have a reason to.
It's obviously false.
Only if they want India to start arming and funding Kurdish freedom fighters against Turkey but I don’t think Turkey will do that its just a joke.
Let's be a bit real, India cannot arm anything beyond Afghanistan, it doesn't have that experience, and neither does it know anything beyond this South Asian region.
Would it be beneficial for kashmir?
According to this article, "The commander of the SNA militia "Sulayman Shah Brigades", Muhammed Abu Amsha, announced five days ago to members of his militia in the occupied city of Şiyê near Afrin that the Turkish state wanted to relocate some units to Kashmir."
Don't take article as truth as it is probably a propaganda piece but if it were true do you think it would be good?
Προς νέα σύγκρουση
www.pentapostagma.gr
Mods, please don't delete this thread. My thread is not based on the article. It is based on the question of whether or not Syrian mercenaries will be good for the Kashmir cause.
If you're wondering if they will be good in general though? No. They don't know the terrain, they don't know the language, they don't know the opponent tactics, and neither do they know the general dynamics (meaning logistics to and from Kashmir, and what to expect where, which as anyone can guess is very difficult) of the region.
Your bordered villagers would be of greater help with their stashed weapons than Syrian mercenaries.
Why even think of such a situation when you know it's not possible though?
Among other mentions in the article:
"Pakistan was the second country in the plan, as Ankara and Islamabad prepare a permanent presence of surface units and aircraft of the Pakistani Defense Ministry in the Turkish operation "Shield of the Mediterranean", with which Erdogan hopes to plunder seaports and lands from Greece."
"Abu Emsa said Turkish officers would also ask the commanders of other SMO gangs to state the names of those who would like to go to Kashmir.
Abu Emsa said those leaving his gang would join the list and receive $ 2,000 in funding. He told members of his gang he met in Schiege that Kashmir is as mountainous as Karabakh."
I don't think Karabakh is as mountainous as Kashmir, is it? Probably not even close.
Pretty full of propaganda.