TankMan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 3,213
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
What?Check his reply if he is not annoyed then third person who is annoyed may be psycho.
You can push report button if you think any thing seems false.
You are right, Imran Khan does not have a political mindset.Honestly I can't answer why he waited for 1 year. But ONLY ONE YEAR?! I'd call it 'asap' after the 2013 elections. Mr. Imran Khan has not a political mind--perhaps, to save face, he had to follow through with his 'one year' promise regardless of the consequences. That reflects a non-compromising and rigid, ultimately a non-political mindset. Had he studied the history of NS rules he would have realized by by 2018--if not by 2016--NS would have probably imploded. But, no, IK doesnt' think through. He has no vision. He was, is, and will remain a political clown. Which is sad for Pakistan.
I don't consider him a 'better' option for Pakistan. Not everything boils down to personal financial integrity. Pakistan is not a bank. And Pakistan is not a uniquely and utterly 'corrupt' country in the world. And Pakistan HAS achieved a lot since 1947 despite your PTI idealist supporters continue to harp against.
I have said it before and will say again: I'd rather have a little 'corrupt' but politically accommodating govt of NS over a non-corrupt but politically uncompromising govt of IK. And that's because IK's rule is going to bring mass agitation against him unless he realizes that Pakistan is not a bank but a complex country where 'give and take' should be done on daily basis on political matters.
Sigh!! I don't know what else is left to say. PDF's 'Siasat' page is full of the same things.
The fact that Pakistan has achieved since 1947 doesn't mean we should just sit on our backsides and not try to improve and achieve more. There is no 'PTI idealist' here but there is no doubt Pakistan could be better.
Imran Khan had no one year promise, he chose to wait one year. Perhaps because he had some hope in the assemblies and courts.
You're right about NS imploding though, like I said before, if IK doesn't succeed, something else will take him down.
As for 'mass agitation', If IK does good and performs well, the only ones agitating would be those who put their personal gain above Pakistan and it is good if that happens, will be a step towards making Pakistan more politically mature.
And I'm sure he'll learn to compromise if he ever comes in power.
It's not just about financial integrity, it's about many factors that make IK a better option than Nawaz or Zardari, that integrity is just one of those factors.
At the end of the day, electoral reforms are necessary if we are to continue to have elections and a proper democracy. Otherwise, expect more of the same for the next five or ten years, with Pakistan deteriorating instead of making progress, with occasional military rule, while the rich and corrupt keep getting fatter.
All we can do is hope that our children won't be slaves of their children (Maryam and..... [gasp] Bilawal).