Your example is stupid. Indian Christians can't claim to be inheritors of British conquest of India because it was
British conquest and they never
settled here. Muslim conquests of India became localized as Muslim empires settled here, intermarried, and adopted India as their home. Mughals weren't ruling India as a 'foreign territory' from Central Asia (Like British did to India from London). Mughals, especially after Babur, ruled India as
their home.
Pakistanis take pride in the Muslim conquest of India. There was no Pakistan back then. Do you remember our DG ISI Ahmed Shuja
Pasha? Guess who are Pashas? A Turkic tribe! Guess who were Mughals? Another Turkic tribe. Moreover, we are the
largest Pashtun country in the world. Do you want me to list Pashtun generals who conquered Delhi and formed empires in India?
Your inferiority-complex stricken rants won't change history my friend. Pakistan is the natural inheritor of Islamic rule in the subcontinent, and hence we take pride in the Muslim rule of subcontinent that was based
locally, not from a foreign capital like British rule was.