integra
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2009
- Messages
- 2,287
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Quite a socialist lecture.. HUH.
Agriculture will flourish with the ascend of industialization and technology.
How can you bring technology to the farmer if you dont know how to build a tractor or provide them with high yield seeds? Research and Development requires high tech precise machines which are only built by industrialized countries.
Why shift in occupation is not desirable? when you bring technology to the agriculture and mechanize it then ofcourse significant number of workforce in the agriculture will become redundant. You need to place them somewhere else and industries are the place to go.
You are self contradictory.. that i can say.
What I have proposed is a hypothesis. What you are saying
has been the case for every other industrialized nations, not that
its wrong but lets try to think out of the box for a while here.
Just because everyone started from zero that does not mean we
shall have to tread the same path. The research or machinery
that have been materialized should not be built from zero again.
Thats just a wastage of resources.
Think about our RMG factories, did the entrepreneurs built
every machines from scratch? That would have been just wrong.
Operating this high-tech machines generated some
new kind of expertise and efficiency.
Same can be done for the agricultural sector. If the priority
is given many farmers will be trained in a high-tech scenario.
Maintaning gadgets will help them know about proper market prices
and information on high-yield seeds.
Urban agricultural firms will generate a new kind of job spectrum
without hampering nature or resources.
Although I'm in for ship-building and automobile plants.