Difference between an independent country and Bangladesh
Most important disposition of an independent nation is safeguarding its citizen and its sovereignty. Nepal, a land locked country solely dependent on india for its export & import, shown how an independent country assert its sovereignty against heavy odd. In 2015, when Nepal redone its constitution, india put blockade on Nepal to force constitutional change. But Nepal hold its ground even in face of indian blockade.
Just 4 days ago brutal indian border guard, BSF open fired and killed a Nepali youth in Anandabazaar near the border with India.
Whole Nepal erupted with anti indian protest.
http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/...an-embassy-to-protest-kanchanpur-killing.html
As usual indian embassy in Katmandu resorted to blatant lie and denied BSF killing Nepali youth. But resolve of Nepal people forced Indian national security advisor to call Nepali PM (on behalf of indian PM) and offered pseudo apology and promise to carry out investigation in BSF killing.
https://www.thequint.com/world/2017...rupt-in-nepal-over-killing-of-youth-on-border
There is reason why this incident is important for Bangladesh and Bangladeshis to observe, learn and ponder upon.
Awami league, a subservient indian regime, used brutal police force, torture and introduced draconian law to suppress and harass any protest or voice against continuous indian killings of Bangladeshis at border. After Felani’s killing (a young Bangladeshi girl who was brutally shot by indian BSF and left to die in the border fence), subservient awami league regime even prevented journalists from meeting her family.
Recently there was a civic seminar to discuss indian border killing of Bangladeshi citizens but subservient awami league regime on instruction from india blocked the seminar and asked panel to go home.
http://www.thedailystar.net/city/police-stop-seminar-border-killing-1367434
Since Peelkhana massacre, at onset of awami league assuming power in 2009, Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), once vanguard of Bangladesh border was systematically destroyed. Awami league, an indian subservient and dictatorial regime, on instruction from india, ordered BDR to put down arms at border while facing indian hostility. Awami league heavily recruited its cadre into Bangladesh border guard who had been seen smiling when accepting dead body of Bangladeshi killed by indian BSF.
Compare to Nepali resolve and action for its citizen, can any sane Bangladeshi (except awami league cadres) can claim Bangladesh is an independent country? Obviously not; not with awami league blatant submission of Bangladesh sovereignty to india.
Most important disposition of an independent nation is safeguarding its citizen and its sovereignty. Nepal, a land locked country solely dependent on india for its export & import, shown how an independent country assert its sovereignty against heavy odd. In 2015, when Nepal redone its constitution, india put blockade on Nepal to force constitutional change. But Nepal hold its ground even in face of indian blockade.
Just 4 days ago brutal indian border guard, BSF open fired and killed a Nepali youth in Anandabazaar near the border with India.
Whole Nepal erupted with anti indian protest.
http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/...an-embassy-to-protest-kanchanpur-killing.html
As usual indian embassy in Katmandu resorted to blatant lie and denied BSF killing Nepali youth. But resolve of Nepal people forced Indian national security advisor to call Nepali PM (on behalf of indian PM) and offered pseudo apology and promise to carry out investigation in BSF killing.
https://www.thequint.com/world/2017...rupt-in-nepal-over-killing-of-youth-on-border
There is reason why this incident is important for Bangladesh and Bangladeshis to observe, learn and ponder upon.
Awami league, a subservient indian regime, used brutal police force, torture and introduced draconian law to suppress and harass any protest or voice against continuous indian killings of Bangladeshis at border. After Felani’s killing (a young Bangladeshi girl who was brutally shot by indian BSF and left to die in the border fence), subservient awami league regime even prevented journalists from meeting her family.
Recently there was a civic seminar to discuss indian border killing of Bangladeshi citizens but subservient awami league regime on instruction from india blocked the seminar and asked panel to go home.
http://www.thedailystar.net/city/police-stop-seminar-border-killing-1367434
Since Peelkhana massacre, at onset of awami league assuming power in 2009, Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), once vanguard of Bangladesh border was systematically destroyed. Awami league, an indian subservient and dictatorial regime, on instruction from india, ordered BDR to put down arms at border while facing indian hostility. Awami league heavily recruited its cadre into Bangladesh border guard who had been seen smiling when accepting dead body of Bangladeshi killed by indian BSF.
Compare to Nepali resolve and action for its citizen, can any sane Bangladeshi (except awami league cadres) can claim Bangladesh is an independent country? Obviously not; not with awami league blatant submission of Bangladesh sovereignty to india.
Last edited: