What's new

Did Two Nation Theory Die in 1971 After Creation of Bangladesh?

Hundred of millions of Muslims still live in India which shows Two nation theory failed.

Who look different, speak different but are Muslims by religion hardly makes them same as now does it?, Somalia is a Muslim but would i want him in my beloved kpk, the answer is no.

We look down on Indian Muslims as short, skinny, imbreds.
 
Who look different, speak different but are Muslims by religion hardly makes them same as now does it?, Somalia is a Muslim but would i want him in my beloved kpk, the answer is no.

We look down on Indian Muslims as short, skinny, imbreds.

I am referring to Punjab and Sindh, We don't consider people belonging to East Iranian stock related to our civilization. The discussion is about so called Two nation Theory, not about race. BTW, NWFP was the only Muslim majority province which never voted for Muslim League in 1946 elections and thus cut off from Pakistan movement till the end.
 
I am referring to Punjab and Sindh, We don't consider people belonging to East Iranian stock related to our civilization. The discussion is about so called Two nation Theory, not about race. BTW, NWFP was the only Muslim majority province which never voted for Muslim League in 1946 elections and thus cut off from Pakistan movement till the end.

Your civilisation has been given to you by us, look all around you even the Punjabi that you claim to be part of your civilisation were central asians who moved to these areas, even Sikhs.

These people are more genetically close to iranic people then the real Indians who are south Indian dravidians.
 
Two nation theory was dead the day when one-third of Muslims of Republic of India decided not to leave for Pakistan. This clearly showed that there were some Muslims in India who were tolerant of other religions and who did not believe that Muslims formed a different nation but that all Indians form one nation.

The objective behind the demand for Pakistan was to achieve religious freedom and economic and social uplift of Muslims as much as possible. The objective was not to create a hate filled divide between Muslims and Hindus. The demand was only for those areas where Muslims were in clear majority. Of course there were Muslims all across India, and not just in the areas covered under the demand for Pakistan. It was therefore implied that even after the creation of Pakistan there would still be Muslims living in India as a minority.

Muslims in India are still seen by Hindus through the prism of the partition. Prejudice and faith discrimination against Muslims does exist in India. Their economic conditions are worse than all others communities i.e 31pc of Muslims live below the poverty line which is close to the 35pc for Dalits and Adivasis.

Indian Muslims are the most confused Muslim community in the world with the exception of Kashmiri Muslims and few others. They don't have courage to take a stand against anything , have to live as second or third class citizens in their own home land, they cant even practice their faith freely in Hindu dominated areas, they can,t build new mosques and save old ones, can't eat beef, their social status is that of low caste Hindus(untouchables), they live under constant fear of Hindu majority, they even try to intermarry with Hindus to please them and some like those of Bollywood celebrity take part in pooja phaat in attempt of pretending to be secular or tolerate because tolerance for Hindus is giving up your faith and adopting Hindu practices and visiting temple and gurdawra
 
Your civilisation has been given to you by us, look all around you even the Punjabi that you claim to be part of your civilisation were central asians who moved to these areas, even Sikhs.

These people are more genetically close to iranic people then the real Indians who are south Indian dravidians.

New migration didn't change the culture of the land of Punjab or elsewhere in North India . Historically Indus river defined the boundary of the end of Indian civilization. The East Iranic Pashtun even are not related to the Indo-Aryan Gandhara culture who spoke Sanskrit and later Gandhari Prakrit.
 
I am referring to Punjab and Sindh, We don't consider people belonging to East Iranian stock related to our civilization. The discussion is about so called Two nation Theory, not about race. BTW, NWFP was the only Muslim majority province which never voted for Muslim League in 1946 elections and thus cut off from Pakistan movement till the end.

Sorry but Punjabi, Sindhis or Kashmiris are not genetically closer to Indians. Apart Indian Punjabis who are just 2% of Indian population, rest of Indian population have 50-80% South Indian genes. Indian chamar sikhs will have 40-45% ASI genes while Jatts and Khatris 30% just like Pakistani punjabis. Kalash people are also Indo-Aryan or "Indic" as you say it lol. Basically "Indic" mean Indo-Aryans speaking population, doesnt mean Biharis and Punjabis are same.

"Indo-Aryan or Indic peoples are an Indo-Europeanethno-linguistic group referring to the wide collection of peoples united as native speakers of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Iranian family of Indo-European languages."

Indo-Aryan peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
harappadna.org
 
The objective behind the demand for Pakistan was to achieve religious freedom and economic and social uplift of Muslims as much as possible. The objective was not to create a hate filled divide between Muslims and Hindus. The demand was only for those areas where Muslims were in clear majority. Of course there were Muslims all across India, and not just in the areas covered under the demand for Pakistan. It was therefore implied that even after the creation of Pakistan there would still be Muslims living in India as a minority.

Muslims in India are still seen by Hindus through the prism of the partition. Prejudice and faith discrimination against Muslims does exist in India. Their economic conditions are worse than all others communities i.e 31pc of Muslims live below the poverty line which is close to the 35pc for Dalits and Adivasis.

Indian Muslims are the most confused Muslim community in the world with the exception of Kashmiri Muslims and few others. They don't have courage to take a stand against anything , have to live as second or third class citizens in their own home land, they cant even practice their faith freely in Hindu dominated areas, they can,t build new mosques and save old ones, can't eat beef, their social status is that of low caste Hindus(untouchables), they live under constant fear of Hindu majority, they even try to intermarry with Hindus to please them and some like those of Bollywood celebrity take part in pooja phaat in attempt of pretending to be secular or tolerate because tolerance for Hindus is giving up your faith and adopting Hindu practices and visiting temple and gurdawra

What about economic condition Saraiki, Pashtuns, Baloch and Bengalis who were left behind even after getting the new country, what is the rate of poverty and illiteracy among them, there condition is much worse than Indian Muslims. Only Punjabis benefitted from the canal colonies boom left by British.
 
Your civilisation has been given to you by us, look all around you even the Punjabi that you claim to be part of your civilisation were central asians who moved to these areas, even Sikhs.

These people are more genetically close to iranic people then the real Indians who are south Indian dravidians.

Indic is basically language group, for retarded like @INDIC it means Kalash, Kashmiris, Punjabis, sindhis are same as Indians genetically. 
What about economic condition Saraiki, Pashtuns, Baloch and Bengalis who were left behind even after getting the new country, what is the rate of poverty and illiteracy among them, there condition is much worse than Indian Muslims. Only Punjabis benefitted from the canal colonies boom left by British.

There are millions of pashtuns and baloch in Punjab. Half of Baloch population of Pakistan is in Punjab. The director of Waar film is Baloch-Punjabi. I agree Balochistan isnt as developed as it should be, but after completion of 194 small dams till 2023 and Gwadar will change face of province completly. So dont post BS.

I can see Balochistan being best province to live in decade or to out of South Asia because of small population.
 
Sorry but Punjabi, Sindhis or Kashmiris are not genetically closer to Indians. Apart Indian Punjabis who are just 2% of Indian population, rest of Indian population have 50-80% South Indian genes. Indian chamar sikhs will have 40-45% ASI genes while Jatts and Khatris 30% just like Pakistani punjabis. Kalash people are also Indo-Aryan or "Indic" as you say it lol. Basically "Indic" mean Indo-Aryans speaking population, doesnt mean Biharis and Punjabis are same.

"Indo-Aryan or Indic peoples are an Indo-Europeanethno-linguistic group referring to the wide collection of peoples united as native speakers of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Iranian family of Indo-European languages."

Indo-Aryan peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
harappadna.org

What about haplogroup L3a, you will even find the genetic connection of Pakistanis with South Indians.
 
New migration didn't change the culture of the land of Punjab or elsewhere in North India . Historically Indus river defined the boundary of the end of Indian civilization. The East Iranic Pashtun even are not related to the Indo-Aryan Gandhara culture who spoke Sanskrit and later Gandhari Prakrit.

But there are still millions of Indo-Aryan speakers in KPK.
 
I am referring to Punjab and Sindh, We don't consider people belonging to East Iranian stock related to our civilization. The discussion is about so called Two nation Theory, not about race. BTW, NWFP was the only Muslim majority province which never voted for Muslim League in 1946 elections and thus cut off from Pakistan movement till the end.

qissa-khwani-bazaar-peshawar-1.jpg


First Independence Day procession passing through Qissa Khwani Bazaar (August 14, 1947). 
Sorry but Punjabi, Sindhis or Kashmiris are not genetically closer to Indians. Apart Indian Punjabis who are just 2% of Indian population, rest of Indian population have 50-80% South Indian genes. Indian chamar sikhs will have 40-45% ASI genes while Jatts and Khatris 30% just like Pakistani punjabis. Kalash people are also Indo-Aryan or "Indic" as you say it lol. Basically "Indic" mean Indo-Aryans speaking population, doesnt mean Biharis and Punjabis are same.

"Indo-Aryan or Indic peoples are an Indo-Europeanethno-linguistic group referring to the wide collection of peoples united as native speakers of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Iranian family of Indo-European languages."

Indo-Aryan peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
harappadna.org

Check out the racism against the bihari workers in indian punjab... lmao ar "all subcontinent looks similiar"...
 
What about haplogroup L3a, you will even find the genetic connection of Pakistanis with South Indians.

Yes what about L3A? Pakistanis can also find conecction with African tribes. After all we are all humans right? Check harappadna.org, Indian punjabi jatt sikhs are more closer to pashtuns then South Indians or biharis. 
Check out the racism against the bihari workers in indian punjab... lmao ar "all subcontinent looks similiar"...

Forget about Biharis, they dont even spare Chamar Sikhs who are basically like Pakistani Punjabi Chistians churas. This retard has been using "Indic" as genetic term. For him Brahui people of Balochistan which speak Dravidian language are genetically related to South Indians. Depite them having just 12% ASI genes, the lowest in South Asia. Even Kalash people have more ASI genes at 23-24%.

One just have to look at their TV and Film industry, 90% of leading actors are Punjabi, Pathans and Sindhis. Its easier to find out Sindhi actors and actresses, majority of their surnames finsh as "ani".
 
Last edited:
What about economic condition Saraiki, Pashtuns, Baloch and Bengalis who were left behind even after getting the new country, what is the rate of poverty and illiteracy among them, there condition is much worse than Indian Muslims. Only Punjabis benefitted from the canal colonies boom left by British.
I was comparing the economic and social condition of those Muslims who stayed in India and those who migrated to Pakistan during creation of Pakistan . Saraiki, Pashtuns, Baloch are still in better conditions than those vast majority of Indian Muslims living in below poverty line
 
Indic is basically language group, for retarded like @INDIC it means Kalash, Kashmiris, Punjabis, sindhis are same as Indians genetically. 


There are millions of pashtuns and baloch in Punjab. Half of Baloch population of Pakistan is in Punjab. The director of Waar film is Baloch-Punjabi. I agree Balochistan isnt as developed as it should be, but after completion of 194 small dams till 2023 and Gwadar will change face of province completly. So dont post BS.

I can see Balochistan being best province to live in decade or to out of South Asia because of small population.

I have never heard anyone getting rid of poverty in 10 years. Almost all Sindhis live in villages, Saraikis and Baloch live in extreme poverty while rest of you consider Pashtuns as extremely backward. If British hadn't left Canal colonies in Punjab, perhaps Punjab would too had been in same shape.

Indian Muslims are backward because their educated elite left for Pakistan and now constitute Muhajirs in Pakistan. 
I was comparing the economic and social condition of those Muslims who stayed in India and those who migrated to Pakistan during creation of Pakistan . Saraiki, Pashtuns, Baloch are still in better conditions than those vast majority of Indian Muslims living in below poverty line

Indian Muslims had literacy rate 60% in 2001, Pakistan will achieve 60% literacy by 2015. The educated elite of Indian Muslims left for Pakistan, that is one of the factors of of their backwardness.

All Sindhis still live in villages. Except for North Punjab, rest of Pakistan is still backward. There are many districts in Pakistan with mere 20% literacy rate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom