RazPaK
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,056
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
.....meaning?
just google please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.....meaning?
Generalization alert!
After 10 posts and some what stupid debate here at PDF. I now understand why some people say things like:
Chinese guys are some of most incoherent speakers i spoke to.(this is probably the reason for other stereotype -They also suck big time with girls.)
You have to understand the historical humiliation and violence the Hindus have suffered from for over a thousand years. Many civilizations have conquered them, the Muslims empires, Arabs, Turkic, Timur, Afghans, and the British. After centuries and in fact a millennium of defeat and humiliation and slavery is going to depress the population and ruin their self-esteem.
The British were slightly different from the conquerors in the sense they did a better job dividing the Hindustanis and brainwashing them and setting up a system in Hind one they developed. It is understandable why many have this inferiority complex, the Indian has been a defeated race for the greater part of a millennium. This is not to say they haven't made small achievements here and there.
I am a Muslim Pakistani Arain. Do we have a problem?
.....meaning?
he means Aryan.
Haha you're a funny guy. I didn't write Aryan, but Arain. There is a difference.
please go thru the posts of other Chinese guys, you ll know what i had to go through. Yeah that has nothing to do with the topic. I wrote what i felt after that.
---------- Post added at 11:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:22 AM ----------
he was talking about his caste.
Everyone has heard of the caste system, with the Brahmins on top. Aryan invasion, etc.
And apparently, the worst insult in India is to call someone "black". Skin colour in India is linked with social status, and is the first thing that people write down when they describe themselves to potential partners..
Look what the British did to you, and compare that to China's counterattack against India's Forward Policy.
Yet now you hate Chinese and Pakistanis the most. Even though we are developing countries like you, and we share the same history of being exploited by the colonial powers.
Coming back to the thread context, I still cannot fathom why China had not chosen not to hold onto their claimed area (North-west Arunachal) after all.
Most developing countries, especially those who had a history of being exploited by colonialism, will want to stick together.
Indians on the other hand, they are always looking for the affection of the former colonial powers (the West).
Like in school, when one guy wants to leave his group, in order to join the "cooler kids".
So even though the British did so much to you, Indians will always hate their neighbours first (Chinese and Pakistanis), and forgive the West without a second thought.
Wasn't expecting this from a HK'erAnd we don't suck up to the Japanese like India does to the former colonialists in the West.
Why should I know about your problem ?? Go Ask your friend who knows about India's Hindus' problem while sitting far away from his own country
a guess (since you asked me) : If Hindus after living under so many different rules are stressed till now (lol)..then I guess yes, pakistanis must be more stressed given the fact that they not only faced so many rulers and opressions but also had to accept the invaders culture.
---------- Post added at 11:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 AM ----------
he means Aryan.
Partially true.
But is is INDIA, who is declaring a fellow developing nation (China) as their "number one enemy". While China has done no such thing.
And really, how can an Italian waitress become the number 1 most powerful person in India? Are we expected to believe that this was just a mere coincidence?
What percentage of Indian citizens are white Europeans that were born in Europe? The chances of it being a pure coincidence are nearly zero.
The way i see it. Nehru did the right thing. That was a war based on igo. why waste human lives on nothing.
Before IA could give it up, the lame as$ leaders of our country gave it up... Nehru never had the balls to take a firm stand. Be it Kashmir problem resolution or Tibet cessation to PLA. I cant understand why that fukcer is much revered in our books etc when we had better leaders than him.