1) Indus flows through China,Pakistan,India.
Indus didn't Flow in India.
Kashmir is occupied by India not Part of India.
2)It originates from China.
The significance of river Indus in naming India is because historically it was used to specify India's location geographically.
Wrong wrong wrong.
The significance of INDIA is that this name was originated from word INDUS.
India never exists at that time.
How the word Indus can be named after India when the word INDUS born first and the word INDIA Born and originated from INDUS after a long long time??
The ganges civilization(Original civilization of modern day india)
Was the
extension of Indus civilization.
Primarily centered along the Indus and the Punjab region, the civilization extended into the Ghaggar-Hakra River valley[7] and the Ganges-Yamuna Doab,
Indus Valley Civilization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thats why even the ancient Chinese called India: Yìndù - 印度
The word is YINDU not india.
The word India didn't even existed at those times.
The word India is never used in any ancient History.
The Persian/Arabs used the term Hind,i.e people beyond the Indus river.
You have clarified yourself.
Beyond the indus,means people living away from Indus.
So having no link with Indus.
Based on a river's course of flow,you are claiming possession of origin of cultures?
Not on river course of flow but on the ORIGINS or the Piece of land in which the civilization exist's.
And that part is modern Pakistan.
Even if we claim it on river flow base then still it is ours Because the Indus's flow is all along Pakistan.
B/w why I am claiming the thing which is mine??
The Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) was a Bronze Age civilization (3300–1300 BCE; mature period 2600–1900 BCE) which was centred mostly in the western part of the Subcontinent[2][3] and which flourished around the Indus River basin.[n 1] Primarily centered along the Indus and the Punjab
encompassing most of what is now Pakistan,
Recently, Indus sites have been discovered in Pakistan's northwestern Frontier Province as well.
More than hurting us,you"ll make a laughing stock of yourself.
Looks like it has already hurted you badly..
isn't it??
Agree!
Wo wo stop it man.
I said that the history Of SIKH INVASION IN INDOPAK parts is mutually shared by both countries because it is present in both countries.
How can we share IVC with you when it is not present in India.?
Your Pin is still sticking in the same place.
Please leave this mentality that whole south asia is yours.
In this case it actually does,because for many Hinduism is culture as well.
Also our nations were formed on 2 nation theory.
Hinduism is not a culture.
the culture you are talking about is Ganges CV culture which is slightly different from IVC.
It is mixed with Hinduism which has nothing to do with it.Since it is Ganges Culture.The holy place of Ganges river in hinduism has spread this thinking that ganges culture is hindu culture.
Do you want to say that a hindu born and bred in Europe having no clue about ganges culture is not hindu because he does not follow the so called hindu culture which is actually a Ganges culture.?
Strange..