What's new

Dhaka protests Myanmar’s claim of rebel existence in Bangladesh

Many countries backed so called rohingya as many are thinking they are unarmed and helpess. but the case with AA is different. They already have arms and man powers, unlike so called rohingya and attacking police camps is definitely unforgivable. So they will certainly be crashed soon. if BD want to support , just do it. They will also bring a serious problems for BD as well. Dont forget CHT is also the part of their future arakan dream. :D even now dont u feel the numbers of drugs case is rising near border and camps ? BGB's hard and busy days are just ahead. keep supporting them. !!

You're just contradicting yourself. If Bangladesh is really supporting AA why would they have a conflict with BGB? And no CHT is not part of their aspirations for a separate state. And Tatmadaw is the main producer of illicit drugs in the region, if you want to talk in that line, then Tatmadaw would be our biggest enemy.

Now analyze the current situation,
- The govt. in Bangladesh is as strong as ever domestically after the recent elections. Hence, they won't hesitate to take any bold measures with regards to Rakhaine. This would be in a total contrast to what our position was in 2016-17.

- Xi Jinping was one of the first to congratulate Hasina on her re-election, that means China is quite supportive to the govt.

- You're right, the case of AA is different from the Rohingyas. The best part of AA is that they enjoy overwhelming support among the Rakhaine Buddhists who, unlike the Rohingyas, are recognized as a native ethnic group in Burma.

- The Rakhaine Buddhists have their own grievances. Despite winning a majority in the parliament, the Arakan National Party (ANP) were not allowed to hold the position of Chief Minister of Rakhine State which is currently held by a member of Suu Kyi led NLD. Some popular leaders of ANP are being arrested by Burmese govt on fake charges. Recently, the Rakhine Buddhists wanted to observe the day marking the end of independent Arakan Kingdom when the Bamars invaded the kingdom in the 18th century. Police fired at the people who were observing the day and put a ban on it.

- There is another major front of your civil war at the Chinese border. The ceasefire agreement is set to end in April this year and one of the major combatants in that front is Arakan Army.

- The GDP growth and FDIs have slowed down in Myanmar after the international backlash following the Rohingya crisis.

Now if Myanmar starts another clearance operation in Rakhine, it will clearly backfire. The entire Rakhine population would turn against the Tatmadaw and Myanmar central govt. As the AA enjoys widespread support among the general Rakhine Buddhist people, it's possible in the wake of a Tatmadaw operation, they will mix into the local population and launch guerrilla attacks on Tatamadaw. This will push Rakhine into a full-fledged civil war for several years, further draining your resources.
 
Myanmar needs to crush this less known entity Arakan Army ,they are known to be hand in gloves with kanchin rebels until and unless the KIA are crushed by myanmar other groups will get confidence and supplies from them
Do not dream too deep. Burmese ragtag army will vaporize once the real fighting starts by all the parties. AA is quite strong.
 
Do not dream too deep. Burmese ragtag army will vaporize once the real fighting starts by all the parties. AA is quite strong.
If the burmese junta continue this cheatery with Bangladesh, then Bangladesh will have no option other than to extend support for the Rakhine and Rohingya fighters so that they can create 'Free areas' within Rakhine state. If Rohingya fighters can capture even a few hundred sq. km land within Rakhine state, it would be enough to repatriate 1 million Rohingyas from BD to there. Then Bangladesh should support in every possible ways so that Rohingya free state can defend burmese attack. Much like what Armenia is doing for Nagarno-Karabakh Republic aganist Azerbaijan. If necessary 50k Rohingya fighters should be raised and armed.

In 1950s, Rohingya Mujahid Party created such a free areas in Northern Arakan along the border with BD. But unfortunately, then Pakistan govt. collaborated with the burmese to finish off those Mujahid and their free areas. If then Pakistan govt. helped those Rohingya Mujahid to hold the ground, then none of the later atrocity would have happened against the Rohingyas and Bangladesh would not have found itself with such a trouble now facing.Then Pakistan govt. and later Bangladesh govt. both tried to appease and play good neighbor with the uncivilized burmese which proved disastrous later for both Rohingyas and Bangladesh.
 
Last edited:
You're just contradicting yourself. If Bangladesh is really supporting AA why would they have a conflict with BGB? And no CHT is not part of their aspirations for a separate state. And Tatmadaw is the main producer of illicit drugs in the region, if you want to talk in that line, then Tatmadaw would be our biggest enemy.

Now analyze the current situation,
- The govt. in Bangladesh is as strong as ever domestically after the recent elections. Hence, they won't hesitate to take any bold measures with regards to Rakhaine. This would be in a total contrast to what our position was in 2016-17.

- Xi Jinping was one of the first to congratulate Hasina on her re-election, that means China is quite supportive to the govt.

- You're right, the case of AA is different from the Rohingyas. The best part of AA is that they enjoy overwhelming support among the Rakhaine Buddhists who, unlike the Rohingyas, are recognized as a native ethnic group in Burma.

- The Rakhaine Buddhists have their own grievances. Despite winning a majority in the parliament, the Arakan National Party (ANP) were not allowed to hold the position of Chief Minister of Rakhine State which is currently held by a member of Suu Kyi led NLD. Some popular leaders of ANP are being arrested by Burmese govt on fake charges. Recently, the Rakhine Buddhists wanted to observe the day marking the end of independent Arakan Kingdom when the Bamars invaded the kingdom in the 18th century. Police fired at the people who were observing the day and put a ban on it.

- There is another major front of your civil war at the Chinese border. The ceasefire agreement is set to end in April this year and one of the major combatants in that front is Arakan Army.

- The GDP growth and FDIs have slowed down in Myanmar after the international backlash following the Rohingya crisis.

Now if Myanmar starts another clearance operation in Rakhine, it will clearly backfire. The entire Rakhine population would turn against the Tatmadaw and Myanmar central govt. As the AA enjoys widespread support among the general Rakhine Buddhist people, it's possible in the wake of a Tatmadaw operation, they will mix into the local population and launch guerrilla attacks on Tatamadaw. This will push Rakhine into a full-fledged civil war for several years, further draining your resources.
Get this in your head dear Bangladeshi Muslim. Myanmar may suffer from civil war and various ethnic tension, however when it comes to the issue of rohingya muslim then everyone in Myanmar has the same opinion and that is rohingya Muslims and Muslims in particular should be thrown out of Buddhist Myanmar.

The Arakan army dislikes rohingya Muslims from their core. Like tatmadaw they also declared rohingyas and ARSA as extremist Muslim group who should not be staying in independent Arakan if it becomes independent in future. Remember that the rakhine people dislikes the rohingya Muslims more than the dominant bamar population. In 2012 a riot occurred in rakhine state between rakhine Buddhists and rohingya Muslims.

Lastly I want to tell you that Myanmar has been a Buddhist state and Buddhist land since the last 2500 years. Muslims are not our own and we are not obligated to keep Muslims in our land. They are your brothers in faith so keep them in Pakistan or Bangladesh or Turkey.
 
Lastly I want to tell you that Myanmar has been a Buddhist state and Buddhist land since the last 2500 years. Muslims are not our own and we are not obligated to keep Muslims in our land. They are your brothers in faith so keep them in Pakistan or Bangladesh or Turkey.
Have you got your 2 acres farmland and 1 acre to build your house? What about the ration? Are they good?
 
Have you got your 2 acres farmland and 1 acre to build your house? What about the ration? Are they good?
We don't want Myanmar to face the same situation India faced in 1947.Hindus lost Pakistan and Bangladesh to Muslims and the people of Myanmar learnt from the past and vowed to never make that same mistake which the Indian Hindus made. We will now allow another 1947 type situation in Myanmar. We will not allow Muslims create a separate state by snatching our lands.
 
We don't want Myanmar to face the same situation India faced in 1947.Hindus lost Pakistan and Bangladesh to Muslims and the people of Myanmar learnt from the past and vowed to never make that same mistake which the Indian Hindus made. We will now allow another 1947 type situation in Myanmar. We will not allow Muslims create a separate state by snatching our lands.
40,000 hindus killed in sri lanka 2009 by buddhists, where were you hiding then indian? ;)
 
40,000 hindus killed in sri lanka 2009 by buddhists, where were you hiding then indian? ;)
The Tamil civil war was a ethnic and political war and nor a religious war like the rohingya crisis. Hindus are peaceful people unlike people of a particular community who originated from the desert.
 
The Tamil civil war was a ethnic and political war and nor a religious war like the rohingya crisis. Hindus are peaceful people unlike people of a particular community who originated from the desert.
you are a hindu indian that's why you keep crying about 1947 which no nepali or burmese Buddhist cares about :D
ironic you keep crying about partition 70 years ago but you forget 40,000 dead hindus just 10 years ago :azn: just because the killers are buddhist
 
Hindu rule was the reason behind the decline of Buddhism in Bengal. Many Buddhist temples were demolished by the Hindu kings in the region.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/anci...ddhist-shrine-in-bangladeshs-dinajpur.388323/
Hindus did not kill Buddhists. It was Muslims who wiped out Buddhism from India. Turkic Muslim rulers like Bakhtiyar khilji destroyed Buddhist monasteries like Nalanda and Odnatapuri and killed many Buddhist monks. Buddhism was also popular in Kashmir but Muslims destroyed it by killing and raping Buddhists.
 
Hindus did not kill Buddhists. It was Muslims who wiped out Buddhism from India. Turkic Muslim rulers like Bakhtiyar khilji destroyed Buddhist monasteries like Nalanda and Odnatapuri and killed many Buddhist monks. Buddhism was also popular in Kashmir but Muslims destroyed it by killing and raping Buddhists.
You have no knowledge of history. Search who destroyed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somapura_Mahavihara

The time Islam reached Bengal, buddhism was merely surviving as a sect of low caste hinduism.
Muslim conqueror fought against hindu rulers and buddhist took this opportunity and sided with muslims.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom