@Arefin007 , I want to answer some of your accusations.
First of all, some admissions, I have been confused about the very points you are making now and I have discussed this in this forum many times. Like you, I could not understand how this civil war in 1971 came about, after what happened in 1947. You are young and do not know the full history. Currently many narratives are biased and tilted to various side, so it is very difficult to get an accurate picture.
My personal feeling is like this. We East Bengal Muslims championed and formed Pakistan together with West Pakistanis, but even this was a mistake. If you do not want to discriminate on the basis of race or religion then you cannot ask for a two nation theory, period. You cannot bring example of poor villagers as not being rational, even if they are not, Muslims are surviving in India today, may be they are not thriving, but surviving. If we did not have a partition in 1947, then my guess is that their position would have been much stronger and all of us, both Hindus and Muslims, would have the potential to thrive in a united India, not just survive, because the situation would be more balanced. That was the position of Moududi as well and also of Abul Kalam Azad. So it was not just Jamat founders position, a fact many people like to point out in this forum. My view is that Jinnah, an Ismaili Shia, was in no position to lead the Muslims of South Asia and inevitably he failed us. Yes, I know people will now call me sectarian, but from throughout history, I have seen Shia's selling us out. After Mughal's received Safavid help to come back to power (Humayun and Sher Shah Suri), Shia's (both Arabic and Iranian and their mixture) infiltrated all facets of Mughal empire including Bengal. Alivardi Khan was one of these people of Shia lineage, just like most of the late Nawabs of Murshidabad.
Racism (ethnic nationalism), religious nationalism these are facts of life in most of the world, more so in poor underdeveloped part of the world. So when you try to cobble together a nation based on one of these nationalism then you are on flimsy ground, you cannot ignore one and embrace the other. Either you reject both or accept both. This is what happened after 1947, in fact Azad predicted that Pakistan in that form will not last. We formed a country based on religious nationalism, then ethnic nationalism raised its ugly head.
There were opportunists on the ground in both sides who took advantage and made things worse and of course India found a golden opportunity to break Pakistan. So it was no ones fault and everyones fault. You can spin it any way you like. But you cannot call us traitor, because all of Pakistan betrayed mother India/Hindustan, so we were traitors first in 1947 with our religious nationalism and we East Bengal Muslims did it again with our ethnic nationalism in 1971. So you must understand that the root of this betrayal in 1971, the foundation of this betrayal was layed out with the betrayal in 1947. It did not come out of the blue in 1971.
In any case, all of this is water under the bridge, meaning this is all in the past. Unfortunately, some people are using the past for political gain of the present.
What is more relevant is that Bangladesh today is going through some difficult political period. From a so called democracy, one side have now won and is now dominating. India obviously helped the winning side. I have mentioned to all concerned in a post in the past that in order for us to reduce Indian influence in our nation, the only option we have open now is more unity among us and less division. So BNP/JeI people must either join Awami League or stay neutral, for the sake of national unity. Post Khaleda era is here, she and her son are irrelevant for Bangladesh for the foreseeable future. No matter how ghastly Hasina is or was, the nation must unite under the winner so we can reduce outside influence. That is my message to patriotic Bangladeshi's who are smart and intelligent and care about the future of our nation. We should not fight a war under leaders who are stupid losers and who we will only make us lose again and again. We must know how and when to choose to fight. One fight has happened recently and one side has decisively lost, it is time to move on and build the nation under the winner. Democracy can take a back seat for now, we must concentrate on the economy for which political stability is a must. Awami League for its part, must understand that they need to depend on the people of the country if they want to build a long term future for their party in this land. They cannot just depend on an external power and ignore the interest of the country and nation forever. And no matter how much we try to convince others like Chinese that we are not tilted towards India, they have their people to watch our actions in Bangladesh and their allied countries in the neighborhood, they know how to verify our words against the actual situation on the ground.
. You could have told me this earlier in that 71 thread then I wouldn't have argued further with Anubis and you. I find it very sad. Anyways, just so you know these same Urdu-speaking UP and Bihari Muslims who are treated like animals in your country and forced to live in horrid conditions were the first ones to raise their voice against atrocities on Bengali Muslims during Assam riots and forced government to take note of it, not your Bengali Hindus from West Bengal who were busy celebrating their deaths on fb and calling for extermination of "Kangaldeshi" Muslims from Assam
Infact Naga regiment and Tibetian regiments played crucial roles in surgical strikes inside BD to cut of supply lines. 
