What's new

Dhaka may arrest top Islamist leader for war crimes

100%? ...... 10 Million of your refugees(I quote from Mark Cutts Book) were Hindu's? That would mean the complete Hindu population left BD and you should not be having any hindu population left in your country.

Do you have any historical data to back your claims? Awaiting your comments.

10 million or 9 million is not the issue. Issue is almost none of these Hindus fought as Mukti. The reason could be they were expecting a Hindu India to accept them permanently.
 
.
Any fair 'war crimes trial' would take to task both those on the rebel/terrorist side who committed massacres, as well as those on the Pakistani side that did so.

This is merely a one-sided horse and pony show to remove political opponents and neutralize the Islamist political bloc in Bangladesh
.

This has been dream of Awami and it's master India since the separation but these fool failed to understand that East Pakistan didn't separate from Pakistan to become less Islamic. Islam is in our blood and soul so Awami and India can try but will failed miserably. It's unfortunate that La-Hasina did not learn form the revenge of 75.
 
.
We are seeing the images of that evil person and pakistani army officers for many years on print, tv. Anyone who lives inside Bangladesh, surely used to see this. He just didn't support the Pakistan, he did much help to hunt down our beloved muktijoddha's, recruiting razakaars, help raping innocent womens. Feel free to visit Muktijuddho Jadughor if u come to Bangladesh for to see more and more evidence.

Was Ghulam Azam not war criminal in 96 that your leader Hasina went to his house, gift him prayer mat and copy of Quran while asking for his blessing. Was Maulana Nizami not a war criminal in 96 when Hasian shared same stage with him during a rally against BNP. If they are war criminal now then shouldn't Hasina be put on trail for her collaboration with war criminal. :undecided:


You either a kid or brain washed(magaj dulai) by Awami intellectual. Gulam Azam and rest of Jamat leaders only fault(Bangladeshi prospective) is that they supported united Pakistan. If they have committed mass murder or rape then they would have been killed by Mukti fighters right after separation yet there are not even single case against them since the separation beside political one.




Well when a Razaakar established a party, its normal other razakaars would be poured into it. Simple.

And, day by day new facts with reference are coming out. But ur claims look backdated, as those perception did existed till the 90's.

Tell you what. Let Jamat Islami declare today that they have dissolved alliance with Awamis rival BNP and they have accepted Mujib as the father of nation. I promise, these same people will be declare as national hero of Bangladesh by La-Hasina her self.

I suggest you stop watching and visiting Awamis make believe stories and open your brain to common sense and reality based on history of Awami and it's double standard politics. :tup:
 
Last edited:
.
Because Hasina or Khaleda went to someone's house, therefore, that person is not a war criminal, is not a good logic. War criminals are those who harmed, killed and did many heineous acts on the civilian population during a war.

Saying this, I must also ask is it necessary to try war criminals now after a long 40 years during which period they were allowed to live free? Even Sk. Mujib opted for a nation of unity. So, he did not press for a revenge trial. But, Hasina is bent on dopingh so in order to make the matter an issue in the next election.
 
.
10 million refugees is an estimate, not a verified fact.

Oh come on, do you have every Afghan verified in your country?

It can be 8 million or 12 million but the deviation shouldn't be any more than that and is statistically insignificant.
 
.
Because Hasina or Khaleda went to someone's house, therefore, that person is not a war criminal, is not a good logic. War criminals are those who harmed, killed and did many heineous acts on the civilian population during a war.

Saying this, I must also ask is it necessary to try war criminals now after a long 40 years during which period they were allowed to live free? Even Sk. Mujib opted for a nation of unity. So, he did not press for a revenge trial. But, Hasina is bent on dopingh so in order to make the matter an issue in the next election.

This is political case in any sense . why nobody file single case against Jamat leaders and they are participating in almost every election . Its all about political method of awami league is that who ever oppose awami league will be treated as anti liberation force and use it in Election as tool . if mawlana nizami join awami league he will be treat as a patriot leader .
 
.
Religion don't preach crime... If he is a criminal he can not be religious leader....
 
.
Religion don't preach crime... If he is a criminal he can not be religious leader....
Why to draw a line between black and white by saying certain person is guilty and certain person is not. Look, Bangladesh was not formed by the Gandhian concept. It was built by blood shedding of all sorts of people. Sk. Mujib did not want to divide the population because of conflict of interest with some leaders who wanted an united Pakistan. He thought the issue had been settled with an independent Bangladesh.

But, then, he formed his own Rakkhi Bahini who killed 34,000 JASHOD Party sympathizers. This is the reason why he became unpopular in the country. No one was allowed to sleep at night because of these AL fanatic Bahani.

So, if we want the judicial probe and trial of the perpetrators of 1971, then the country's politics will becomes untenable. The country then will be divided into many sects, and all will be fighting against each other. This is what AL and RAW wanted in the country by carrying out Pilkhana, but, Gen. Moin disappointed them by not allowing his troops to interfere there. The country was saved.

And now, Begum Hasina has come up with another crap that will only divide the population and create anarchy. This is the reason why people like us would oppose the trial of those so-called war criminals of 1971. Remember, in the eyes of Congress, Netaji was a traitor. But, India did not go after his and his collaboratos' probe and trial. Congress leaders understood that the line that divides patriotism from treason is blurred.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom