DG ISPR trolling Indians : Pouring salt over Indian's wounds

[The Accountant]

You are again caught with pants down, when presneted with logic. What was your claim...that f 16s were not involved in the operation at all?

Besides i answered this question in my previous post..go read it again .


According IAF, it did.

Yes my pants were down and guess whom I was screwing ? It was you buddy ...

My logic is simple , Indians are big fat liars and they lied to the teeth about all the actions on 26th and 27th ...

So tell me if MKI was able to evade AMRAAM from a distance of 40 Kms , then why he was not able to lock on F16s from 40 KMs ? Why did your powerful radar did not provide any firing solution ? Don't tell me he was busy evading ... He should already have a lock way before coming within 40 Kms range of F16s

Their can be only two answers:

1. Either MKI cannot even lock F16s from 40 KMs due to superior jamming from F16s and MKI proved to be a dud weapon system
2. Or MKI never dared to come so close to F16s and when F16s fired the AMRAAM from maximum distance and MKI radar was still not able to get lock , MKI chose to disengage and flee?

THere cant be any third explanation ... So choose the best humiliation you want and if you dont know the answer which I am sure you don't then shoo and go away you kid ...

 

[Osiris]

Yes my pants were down and guess whom I was screwing ? It was you buddy ...

My logic is simple , Indians are big fat liars and they lied to the teeth about all the actions on 26th and 27th ...

So tell me if MKI was able to evade AMRAAM from a distance of 40 Kms , then why he was not able to lock on F16s from 40 KMs ? Why did your powerful radar did not provide any firing solution ? Don't tell me he was busy evading ... He should already have a lock way before coming within 40 Kms range of F16s

Their can be only two answers:

1. Either MKI cannot even lock F16s from 40 KMs due to superior jamming from F16s and MKI proved to be a dud weapon system
2. Or MKI never dared to come so close to F16s and when F16s fired the AMRAAM from maximum distance and MKI radar was still not able to get lock , MKI chose to disengage and flee?

THere cant be any third explanation ... So choose the best humiliation you want and if you dont know the answer which I am sure you don't then shoo and go away you kid ...

As I explained before, I guess you were too dimwitted to understand it the first time. So I am gonna explain in lay man's terms.. spoon feeding you.

Firstly the duration of the entire engagement was less than 90 seconds.

When SU 30s were first fired upon AMARAAM's max range(Su 30 were not yet in firing range) , it took evasive maneuvers to evade the missile, went straight up, you loose radar sight of your enemy.

By the time you evade the first missile and get back into firing position, a second missile is launched at you by another F-16. You have to again take evasive maneuvers. In the mean time, the relative distance between the aircrafts is still closing.

Then enemy fires the third missile and turns around and bugs out, while you have to take evasive man. to evade it. By the time, you recover, you don't have him in range any more.

A total of 5 AMARAAMs were dodged by the Sukhois. 3 missiles were dodged by first Su 30 and 2 by his wingman.

That is advantage of having 3:1 numerical superiority in the local theatre. You can saturate an enemy aircraft with missiles from different bearings, such that they can not get into a firing position.

 

[The Accountant]

As I explained before, I guess you were too dimwitted to understand it the first time. So I am gonna explain in lay man's terms.. spoon feeding you.

Firstly the duration of the entire engagement was less than 90 seconds.

When aircraft is fired upon by the other, it takes evasive maneuvers to evade the missile, it goes straight up, you loose of radar sight of your enemy aircraft firing on you. By the time you evade the first missile and get back into firing position, a second missile is launched at you by another aircraft. You have to again take evasive maneuvers. In the mean time, the relative distance between the aircrafts is still closing.

Then enemy fires the third missile and turns around and bugs out, while you have to take evasive man. to evade it. By the time, you recover, you don't have him in range any more.

A total of 5 AMARAAMs were dodged by the lead Sukhoi and his wingman. 3 missiles were dodged by first Su 30 and 2 by his wingman.

That is advantage of having 3:1 numerical superiority in the local theatre. You can saturate an enemy aircraft with missiles from different bearings, such that they can not get into firing position.

Lolz another chawal ...

90 seconds engagement 3 AMRAAM dodged woww what a bollywood scene ... Do you know what is total burnout time of AMRAAM? Exact value is confidential but it is work out to be somewhere around 120 seconds ... So you are saying within 90 seconds F16s fired 3 AMRAAMs and all of them got burned out in 90 seconds so at 30 seconds per missile at max lolz ...

Haar gai physics jeet gya Bollywood ...

 

[Osiris]

Lolz another chawal ...

90 seconds engagement 3 AMRAAM dodged woww what a bollywood scene ... Do you know what is total burnout time of AMRAAM? Exact value is confidential but it is work out to be somewhere around 120 seconds ... So you are saying within 90 seconds F16s fired 3 AMRAAMs and all of them got burned out in 90 seconds so at 30 seconds per missile at max lolz ...

Haar gai physics jeet gya Bollywood ...

As per your Ghafoor there were no F 16 involved in the operation that day. I wonder how, you even believe any AMARAAM was fired, at all, that day.

"Refuting India's claim of shooting down Pakistan's F-16 aircraft, the DG ISPR said that Pakistan had not used F-16 in entire operation and no Pakistani fighter jet has been hit."

https://www.businesstoday.in/latest...-their-fighter-jet-crashing/story/322823.html

It was only IAF, who came up with truth and the specifics.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

As per your Ghafoor there were no F 16 involved in the operation that day. I wonder how, you even believe any AMARAAM was fired, at all, that day.

"Refuting India's claim of shooting down Pakistan's F-16 aircraft, the DG ISPR said that Pakistan had not used F-16 in entire operation and no Pakistani fighter jet has been hit."

https://www.businesstoday.in/latest...-their-fighter-jet-crashing/story/322823.html

It was only IAF, who came up with truth and the specifics.

F 16s were used. Maybe USA would be the factor

 

[The Accountant]

As per your Ghafoor there were no F 16 involved in the operation that day. I wonder how, you even believe any AMARAAM was fired, at all, that day.

"Refuting India's claim of shooting down Pakistan's F-16 aircraft, the DG ISPR said that Pakistan had not used F-16 in entire operation and no Pakistani fighter jet has been hit."

https://www.businesstoday.in/latest...-their-fighter-jet-crashing/story/322823.html

It was only IAF, who came up with truth and the specifics.

I am talking about Mango and you are answering oranges ...

Answer my queries first before raising your queries ...

But how can you answer as you dont have any after making a chawal that in 90 seconds engagement, 3 AMRAAMs were dodged by single MKI ... lolz

Anyways, I like I do have answer to your query ... F16s were not involved in strike package and Asif Ghafoor was referring to strike Package only ... They were not involved in strike package and they specifically mentioned it to please your master that we did not use F16s in peace time to attack another country ... However, we can use them for defense of ours and we did

 

[Ultima Thule]

As per your Ghafoor there were no F 16 involved in the operation that day. I wonder how, you even believe any AMARAAM was fired, at all, that day.

"Refuting India's claim of shooting down Pakistan's F-16 aircraft, the DG ISPR said that Pakistan had not used F-16 in entire operation and no Pakistani fighter jet has been hit."

https://www.businesstoday.in/latest...-their-fighter-jet-crashing/story/322823.html

It was only IAF, who came up with truth and the specifics.

You troll our DGISPR never said that on 27 FEB we never used F-16 at all but he said not in strike Package, our F-16 doing CAP deep inside Pakistani airspace LOC/IB @Osiris

 

[Osiris]

I am talking about Mango and you are answering oranges ...

Answer my queries first before raising your queries ...

But how can you answer as you dont have any after making a chawal that in 90 seconds engagement, 3 AMRAAMs were dodged by single MKI ... lolz

Anyways, I like I do have answer to your query ... F16s were not involved in strike package and Asif Ghafoor was referring to strike Package only ... They were not involved in strike package and they specifically mentioned it to please your master that we did not use F16s in peace time to attack another country ... However, we can use them for defense of ours and we did

I have been answering your stupid questions for a long time, each time, I answer a question, an even more stupid question comes up.

Anyways..

Isn't it obvious, once the missile's Radar lock has been broken(by your evasive manovre ) or spoofed and missile has whizzed you by.

It can not circle back and lock on to the same aircraft again, as the forward looking radar is only in the front section of the missile.

AMARAAM is radar guided missile and not an infrared, all aspect missile, that it will lock on to your aircraft, no matter the relative aspect.

You troll our DGISPR never said that on 27 FEB we never used F-16 at all but he said not in strike Package, our F-16 doing CAP deep inside Pakistani airspace LOC/IB @Osiris

I am talking about Mango and you are answering oranges ...

Answer my queries first before raising your queries ...

But how can you answer as you dont have any after making a chawal that in 90 seconds engagement, 3 AMRAAMs were dodged by single MKI ... lolz

Anyways, I like I do have answer to your query ... F16s were not involved in strike package and Asif Ghafoor was referring to strike Package only ... They were not involved in strike package and they specifically mentioned it to please your master that we did not use F16s in peace time to attack another country ... However, we can use them for defense of ours and we did

I am not trolling, your DGISPR was telling a bare faced lie, that day, and has been doing it, ever since.

This was his exact statement on Feb 27th and this is a Pakistani news source.

"They’re saying a F-16 was shot down but no F-16s were used in this operation, said the ISPR chief."

https://www.samaa.tv/news/2019/02/no-a-pakistani-fighter-jet-was-not-shot-down-by-india/

 

[Ultima Thule]

I have been answering your stupid questions for a long time, each time, I answer a question, an even more stupid question comes up.

Anyways..

Isn't it obvious, once the missile's Radar lock has been broken(by your evasive manovre ) or spoofed and missile has whizzed you by.

It can not circle back and lock on to the same aircraft again, as the forward looking radar is only in the front section of the missile.

AMARAAM is radar guided missile and not an infrared, all aspect missile, that it will lock on to your aircraft, no matter the relative aspect.
Why you repeat your crap again and again OPERATION means he was referring only to STRIKE PACKAGE, and why you assume that we didn't used our F-16 to Fight to another country, you posts reported for your trolling @Osiris





I am not trolling, your DGISPR was telling a bare faced lie, that day, and has been doing it, ever since.

This was his exact statement on Feb 27th and this is a Pakistani news source.

"They’re saying a F-16 was shot down but no F-16s were used in this operation, said the ISPR chief."

https://www.samaa.tv/news/2019/02/no-a-pakistani-fighter-jet-was-not-shot-down-by-india/

I am not trolling, your DGISPR was telling a bare faced lie, that day, and has been doing it, ever since.

This was his exact statement on Feb 27th and this is a Pakistani news source.

"They’re saying a F-16 was shot down but no F-16s were used in this operation, said the ISPR chief."

https://www.samaa.tv/news/2019/02/no-a-pakistani-fighter-jet-was-not-shot-down-by-india/

Trolling, OPERATION MEANS STRIKE PACKAGE, NOT OVERALL OPERATION @Osiris

 

[Osiris]

Trolling, OPERATION MEANS STRIKE PACKAGE, NOT OVERALL OPERATION @Osiris

No, ISPR said, F-16 could not have been shot down, because F-16 was not used in the operation.

Since, we now know the entire truth now, that F 16s were firing AMRAAMs at Su 30s, meaning F-16s were used, strike package or no strike package.

So how can a F16, not been shot down ?

Is your ISPR chief a buffoon ? Don't try to cover up his lies, using clever wording.

 

[Ultima Thule]

No, ISPR said, F-16 could not have been shot down, because F-16 was not used in the operation.

Since, we now know the entire truth now, that F 16s were firing AMRAAMs at Su 30s, meaning F-16s were used, strike package or no strike package.

So how can a F16, not been shot down ?

Is your ISPR chief a buffoon ? Don't try to cover up his lies, using clever wording.

Shut up you're really a troll Look at the 27 FEB press conference he was talking about Strike in IOK, he didn't said a single word about whole operation, your troll, and believe whatever you want but pentagon confirmed that no PAF F-16 missing @Osiris

 

[Osiris]

Shut up you're really a troll Look at the 27 FEB press conference he was talking about Strike in IOK, he didn't said a single word about whole operation, your troll, and believe whatever you want but pentagon confirmed that no PAF F-16 missing @Osiris

Lol, I know, you can not come up with a logical cover up for his barefaced lie.

This is Pakistani news source, not an Indian one.

"They’re saying a F-16 was shot down but no F-16s were used in this operation"

https://www.samaa.tv/news/2019/02/no-a-pakistani-fighter-jet-was-not-shot-down-by-india/

Forget the word operation, tell me, what did he mean, when he said, F-16 could not have been shot down, because it was not used.

If F-16 can fire missiles at Indian aircrafts, that means, it was used, and if it was used, then why it couldn't have been shot down?

P.S : This is what happens, when you try to defend a lie with another lie, you end up making a fool of yourself, one way or the other.

 

[Ultima Thule]

when he said, F-16 could not have been shot down, because it was not used.

keep blabbering baseless i cleared that on my previous post our F-16 patrolling behind the enemy line and doning CAP deep inside Pakistani Airspace (second line of defense) @Osiris

@waz @The Eagle @Horus please banned this troll named @Osiris thanks

 

[The Accountant]

I have been answering your stupid questions for a long time, each time, I answer a question, an even more stupid question comes up.

Anyways..

Isn't it obvious, once the missile's Radar lock has been broken(by your evasive manovre ) or spoofed and missile has whizzed you by.

It can not circle back and lock on to the same aircraft again, as the forward looking radar is only in the front section of the missile.

AMARAAM is radar guided missile and not an infrared, all aspect missile, that it will lock on to your aircraft, no matter the relative aspect.






I am not trolling, your DGISPR was telling a bare faced lie, that day, and has been doing it, ever since.

This was his exact statement on Feb 27th and this is a Pakistani news source.

"They’re saying a F-16 was shot down but no F-16s were used in this operation, said the ISPR chief."

https://www.samaa.tv/news/2019/02/no-a-pakistani-fighter-jet-was-not-shot-down-by-india/

You know nothing ... just fire in the air ...

if total flight time is 120 seconds for 100 kms and you said that engagement period is 90 seconds then it means MKI is at a distance of 30 Kms or less ...

Ary bhai chawlain na maar , aapni Physics ly ker agay hain ...

 

[Ultima Thule]

Aahh..you are digging a deeper and deeper hole for your self, but continuing to defend a lie.

Tell me this, were F-16 not firing missiles at approaching IAF aircrafts? If they were, then why couldn't have they been shot down, in turn?

Yes they have better BVR then IAF, its Indian theory that F-16 had been shot down you have no proof @Osiris

@waz @The Eagle @WebMaster please banned this baseless troll called @Osiris thanks

You know nothing ... just fire in the air ...

if total flight time is 120 seconds for 100 kms and you said that engagement period is 90 seconds then it means MKI is at a distance of 30 Kms or less ...

Ary bhai chawlain na maar , aapni Physics ly ker agay hain ...

he is trolling sir nothing else