DG ISPR on ICJ verdict: another 27th February for india...another surprise day!

[Zapper]

Retype this article on a 132 column sheet, roll it up and shove it up your think hole. If nothing else at least you wil experience what your monkey experiences every morning, noon and night.

Someone's arse is on

It is a victory just listen to the video and your comprehension will improve

Did you actually see your lawyer's argument. It was nothing but emotional ranting

 

[Dubious]

Did you actually see your lawyer's argument. It was nothing but emotional ranting

Says the party who couldnt get the charges dropped nor bring home their "innocent" man

 

[Champs Trophy 2017]

Exactly 27 Feb for Indians.
Indians were celebrating on 27 Feb after losing Mig, getting beaten by locals and shooting down own helo in panic.
Same they are doing now after getting hopeless to get the monkey back and ensuring that he will be hanged.

 

[Protest_again]

India had nothing but now has consular access and a new trial to look forward to. Yes, it must be victory for Pakistan.

 

[VCheng]

Says the party who couldnt get the charges dropped nor bring home their "innocent" man

The ICJ clearly stated that overturning the conviction was not in its jurisdiction.

 

[SQ8]

Kulbashan will die in Pakistan; and practically nothing short of trying some impossible rescue mission will help India.

The online Indian can venom his arse out on forums and social media for all the world, it wouldn’t change the outcome.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

IMHO this folk won’t be hanged!! He will kept in a prison for the demo purposes....

 

[Srinivas]

This is a unique decision involving 1.6 billion stakeholders where 1.6 billion support this decision . All think its in their favor



It apply on spies ?

Yes

What?


Please provide your source where you copied these wordings


Where are you getting your news from? Ithurts.Com ya painfulburn.net?


He is either in shock or trolling or really believes that shit!


It is a victory just listen to the video and your comprehension will improve.

Check Harsh Salwe press briefing video in you tube.

 

[RealNapster]

Yes

Sorry but i am a little miss-informed and less-informed about this. I thought vienna convention only applied to war times and those captured in a declared war. Can you share the relevent clauses in vienna convention related to this particular case ?

 

[Thorough Pro]

then use the non-flamable paper

Someone's arse is on


Did you actually see your lawyer's argument. It was nothing but emotional ranting

 

[Aasimkhan]

Every thing is quite opposite in Pakistan.

It is rather an embarrassing day for Pakistan. Your sham military courts were questioned by ICJ.
Regarding Jhadav ICJ never said he is a spy.

They never said he is a spy? Then why they let him die a dogs death in Pakistani custody ?

 

[sohail.ishaque]

Congrats, but we'll still hang him till death. though i m sure your govt will still call it a victory.
After that ur govt will tell you that it was modi jee that forced Pakistan not to behead kulboshan and only allowed them to hang him. So modi je again won.

THE COURT,
(1) Unanimously, Finds that it has jurisdiction, on the basis of Article I of the Optional Protocol concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 24 April 1963, to entertain the Application filed by the Republic of India on 8 May 2017;

(2) By fifteen votes to one, Rejects the objections by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the admissibility of the Application of the Republic of India and finds that the Application of the Republic of India is admissible

(3) By fifteen votes to one, Finds that, by not informing Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav without delay of his rights under Article 36, paragraph 1 (b), of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan breached the obligations incumbent upon it under that provision;

(4) By fifteen votes to one, Finds that, by not notifying the appropriate consular post of the Republic of India in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan without delay of the detention of Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav and thereby depriving the Republic of India of the right to render the assistance provided for by the Vienna Convention to the individual concerned, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan breached the obligations incumbent upon it under Article 36, paragraph 1 (b), of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations;

(5) By fifteen votes to one, Finds that the Islamic Republic of Pakistan deprived the Republic of India of the right to communicate with and have access to Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, to visit him in detention and to arrange for his legal representation, and thereby breached the obligations incumbent upon it under Article 36, paragraph 1 (a) and (c), of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations;

(6) By fifteen votes to one, Finds that the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is under an obligation to inform Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav without further delay of his rights and to provide Indian consular officers access to him in accordance with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations;

(7) By fifteen votes to one, Finds that the appropriate reparation in this case consists in the obligation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to provide, by the means of its own choosing, effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence of Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, so as to ensure that full weight is given to the effect of the violation of the rights set forth in Article 36 of the Convention, taking account of paragraphs 139, 145 and 146 of this Judgment;

(8) By fifteen votes to one, Declares that a continued stay of execution constitutes an indispensable condition for the effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence of Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav.

Summary: Pakistan has violated international law by denying India consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ruled. The ICJ in the Hague, in a 15-1 decision, ruled that Pakistan had failed to inform Mr Jadhav of his rights, and deprived the Indian government "of the right to communicate with and have access to [him], to visit him in detention and to arrange for his legal representation".
"A continued stay of execution constitutes an indispensible condition for the effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence,". The only judge to dissent was Tassaduq Hussain Jillani. ICJ president judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, who read out the judgement, also directed Pakistan to review and reconsider the death sentence awarded to Jadhav under the provisions of the 1963 Vienna Convention that defines a framework for consular relations between countries

https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/168/168-20190717-SUM-01-00-EN.pdf
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48932951