Rajaraja Chola
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- Messages
- 9,051
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Khobragade brought her to this country with the intent of underpaying her and controlling her employment. That's the definition of human trafficking.
Doesn't matter under either U.S. law or the U.N.'s guidelines.
Because he acted on behalf of his country and not for his own benefit the U.S. official has immunity. Since Khobragade acted for her own benefit rather than that of her country she does not. Both cases are covered in the same Article of the Consular Convention - which, by now, you should have bookmarked, so I'm not going to bother to link to it for the umpteenth time.
Kindly dont twist ur statements according to ur wishes. Devyani and Sangeetha had signed a separate contract of agreeing to "underpayment" . Sangeetha can never claim she was cheated of "original" pay. US govt can tell Devyani cheated on the basis of visa records, but Sangeetha cannot, as she know what salary she got beforehand.
Secondly for working hours, its for Sangeetha to prove in court.
Behalf of US? Was there any order from US, asking him to evacuate them, and book tickets for them tax free? In such a case US can really face backlash.
Indo-US ties are going to take a hit for sure