Developments and Turkish operations in Libya

[GlobalMillitary96]

We should Bomb him like the yanks did Suleymani. Then we shove one up Sisi. Then Al Nahyan and Mahktoum. Then go shake hands with MBS. Solved.

When we have the Göksungur in our inventory we should use it for deep strike missions like that.

 

[PakAlp]

Reminds me of Data Darbar attacks but worse as these shaitaans are stealing bodies from the graves.

 

[Mr.NiceGuy]

 

[GlobalMillitary96]

If we are going to go all in on Haftar we may as well do it correctly. I know it may sound trivial but we must use Atatürk's Libya deployment as a symbol of our fight against Haftar. 100 years ago we were there to fight against Imperialism and now we are there to finish the job.

Upon deployment we should hand out posters of 'Ataturk in Libya'. We should make it noticeable to the world.

 

[HannibalBarca]

If we are going to go all in on Haftar we may as well do it correctly. I know it may sound trivial but we must use Atatürk's Libya deployment as a symbol of our fight against Haftar. 100 years ago we were there to fight against Imperialism and now we are there to finish the job.

Upon deployment we should hand out posters of 'Ataturk in Libya'. We should make it noticeable to the world.

No, you will literally play into Haftar rhetoric of "Invasion".
And will gradually lose support among those who are hesitant or could be hesitant...

Ataturk as no meaning in Libya...
Turks do, mostly with the "Islamic Background".

 

[GlobalMillitary96]

No, you will literally play into Haftar rhetoric of "Invasion".
And will gradually lose support among those who are hesitant or could be hesitant...

Ataturk as no meaning in Libya...
Turks do, mostly with the "Islamic Background".

This isn't an ideological fight. It's a fight against Imperialism and Saudi influence. Ataturk is a symbol of resistance.

 

[HannibalBarca]

This isn't an ideological fight. It's a fight against Imperialism and Saudi influence. Ataturk is a symbol of resistance.

It's a fight to grow Turkey Influence and regional power...
With the "Islamic" identity...

There is no Imperialism in Libya nor in the region... as for Saudi Influence, or let's say GCC influence... it was already there decades ago... And still be around even if Haftar is removed.

Symbols need to speak to the masses... Ataturk only symbolism is in Turkey.
Actually Ataturk is not well seen by Muslims outside of Turkey... he is mostly known as a Dictator and a non-muslim.
So it will be an Opportunity for Haftar and his "jihad" the moment you put Ataturk in the front seat of TR op.

 

[CAN_TR]

It's a mistake to deploy ground forces, destroying LNA's Air Force, building air defense systems and weapon supply should do it.

 

[GlobalMillitary96]

It's a mistake to deploy ground forces, destroying LNA's Air Force, building air defense systems and weapon supply should do it.

Yeah true. If we can cripple his air force then it's game over.

 

[Bismarck]

It's a fight to grow Turkey Influence and regional power...
With the "Islamic" identity...

There is no Imperialism in Libya nor in the region... as for Saudi Influence, or let's say GCC influence... it was already there decades ago... And still be around even if Haftar is removed.

Symbols need to speak to the masses... Ataturk only symbolism is in Turkey.
Actually Ataturk is not well seen by Muslims outside of Turkey... he is mostly known as a Dictator and a non-muslim.
So it will be an Opportunity for Haftar and his "jihad" the moment you put Ataturk in the front seat of TR op.

No imperialism? Al Sisi, Haftar and many more in M.E are supported by US and other western countries like France.

 

[HannibalBarca]

No imperialism? Al Sisi, Haftar and many more in M.E are supported by US and other western countries like France.

Do they have an "Imperialist" agenda?
The answer is no.

 

[Mr.NiceGuy]

Do they have an "Imperialism" agenda?
The answer is no.

Actually the answer is a big YES

 

[HannibalBarca]

Actually the answer is a big YES

Then prove your claim...
That Egypt/KSA and Haftar have an Imperialist agenda?
Give me past / current and future indications through their actions for such "agenda".

 

[Mr.NiceGuy]

Then prove your claim...
That Egypt/KSA and Haftar have an Imperialist agenda?
Give me past / current and future indications through their actions for such "agenda".

Who controls the oil sources?
Then why these well known imperialists support one who controls those oil sources?
Plus who is that the one who supported by imperialists?
Who controls those two states?

So for you whole imperialists support this haftar guy just because he is a good guy who tries to reestablish his ruined country and people?

Come on man can't you all Arabs be that naive..

 

[HannibalBarca]

Who controls the oil sources?
Then why these well known imperialists support one who controls those oil sources?
Plus who is that the one who supported by imperialists?
Who controls those two states?

So for you whole imperialists support this haftar guy just because he is a good guy who tries to reestablish his ruined country and people?

Come on man can't you all Arabs that naive..

Look... Answering with Q my Q isn't going to help.
But you can read about "Imperialism Dynamic" and then see if you can apply such thing to EGY/KSA/ and Haftar actions...
But you wouldn't... Since Imperialism isn't about backing X or Y or Who is your Backer etc...
You have to be careful about your "perceived" Definition of Imperialism...