Saithan
MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2010
- Messages
- 3,771
- Reaction score
- 1
GNA also hit ammo depots
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read some pointless, stupid explanations and questions on Twitter. Why images are very poor quality. Probably SİHA operators did not put themselves at risk, probably because there was no EW systems to block the pantsir. these UAV cameras have a range of 12 km and probably opted to stay 15 km away. (The pantsir must have been able to hit this distance, but they could not, this is another fail for pantsir) And with the entry into the hangar, this risk disappeared. And SİHA operators approached and shot. The blast pressure inside a concrete hangar facilitates the transmission of the burst to the everything inside hangar. There is no probablity to survive for Pantsir.
I agree with you just will add thisI read some pointless, stupid explanations and questions on Twitter. Why images are very poor quality. Probably SİHA operators did not put themselves at risk, probably because there was no EW systems to block the pantsir. these UAV cameras have a range of 12 km and probably opted to stay 15 km away. (The pantsir must have been able to hit this distance, but they could not, this is another fail for pantsir) And with the entry into the hangar, this risk disappeared. And SİHA operators approached and shot. The blast pressure inside a concrete hangar facilitates the transmission of the burst to the everything inside hangar. There is no probablity to survive for Pantsir.
This is another issue, but the second camera angle is close and at the top, in my opinion, this is an indication that it was/or might be shot with Mam-L. As i know our T155s cannot shoot pin-points, we do not have systems like excalibur. and for burning the hangar, the secondary blasts are enough, especially because of the ammunition inside the hangar to burst.I agree with you just will add this
Maybe the attack was T-155 guided by TB2
dude what are you talking about? videos already exist, shot from the open end of the hangar, what bunker buster are you talking about? Please dont spread bs around. There is no our airfighters carrying bunker buster.I read watiya airbase was built by USA if it is true the hangars must have been well built with special cements. It must be hit with something which is bunker buster.
Did I mention any weapon with fighters?dude what are you talking about? videos already exist, shot from the open end of the hangar, what bunker buster are you talking about? Please dont spread bs around. There is no our airfighters carrying bunker buster.