Destroying Myth of Indian Indengious Weapons Capability

[AMCA]

How can you have Indian contribution if your own government says Dhruv is 90 percent imported? Maybe Indian came up with a better way to clean the turbine blades.

hahaha, That was funny.... CAG reports say materials, how did you take it for granted that those were not Raw materials??, now how can CAG blame HAL?? HAL had claimed it when they put forth the proposal of ALH development in front of the cabinet for approval...

---------- Post added at 08:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 AM ----------

You are blabbering now and not making any sense

Does that mean that you ever did???

 

[Bossman]

hahaha, That was funny.... CAG reports say materials, how did you take it for granted that those were not Raw materials??, now how can CAG blame HAL?? HAL had claimed it when they put forth the proposal of ALH development in front of the cabinet for approval...

---------- Post added at 08:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 AM ----------



Does that mean that you did???

Still blabbering!

 

[AMCA]

Still blabbering!

It would sound so, when you have nothing more to contribute

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Be proud on Bharat Rat$hit or similar forums, don't waste bandwidth of a Pakistani forum.

Ha, your not the Admin here. You dont make the rules.

 

[Bossman]

Ha, of course you kick @ss over the Internet, internet tough guy.




What bubble? Like the giant bubble you created with Al Khalid and JF-17??

We don't have to create bubbles. Proof is in the pudding, more than 400 Alkhalids are in active service in strike formations, nearly 50 JF17 are in operational squadron service. We have moved to Alkhalid II and JF 17 Block 2.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

We don't have to create bubbles. Proof is in the pudding, more than 400 Alkhalids are in active service in strike formations, nearly 50 JF17 are in operational squadron service. We have moved to Alkhalid II and JF 17 Block 2.

Which you call indigenous right??

We dont have to worry about numbers or how many are produced. India local produces T-90, MKIs, and some MMRCA fighters.

 

[Bossman]

Ok, they are JVs half and half. What's Pakistani in it?

No always half and half. Some are licence, some are TOT, some are JVs but they all work as they were designed to. Unlike the Indians we don't try to reinvent the wheel every time we start a project and fail as a result.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

No always half and half. Some are licence, some are TOT, some are JVs but they all work as they were designed to. Unlike the Indians we don't try to reinvent the wheel every time we start a project and fail as a result.

Basically there is nothing Pakistani in it, thanks. And you like kicking us for trying.

Of course it works, because its completely Chinese effort.

We will get ToT for T-90 fit some European parts in it, and call it a JV.

 

[AMCA]

No always half and half. Some are licence, some are TOT, some are JVs but they all work as they were designed to. Unlike the Indians we don't try to reinvent the wheel every time we start a project and fail as a result.

So thats why you want Musharraf, to stop him from revealing the failures in your defense Industry... You neither publish it, nor do you like the person who reveals it?? but enjoy when India reveals it.... how smart..

Now whats pakistani in JF-17?? other than the pilot of course which is of no use anyways

 

[Bossman]

Basically there is nothing Pakistani in it, thanks. And you like kick us for trying.

Of course it works, because its completely Chinese effort.

We will get ToT for T-90 fit some European parts in it, and call it a JV.

If you are talking about Alkhalid how it can be a completely Chinese effort, if it has a Ukranian engine, a french transmission, Pakistan designed BMS and main gun also how can JF17 can be Chinese system if it has a Russian engine and design input. BTW only JF17 was a JV as it was 50% venture between PAC and CATIC.

 

[AMCA]

If you are talking about Alkhalid how it is be a completely Chinese effort, if it has a Ukranian engine, a french transmission, Pakistan designed BMS and main gun also how can JF17 can be Chinese system if it has a Russian engine and design input. BTW only JF17 was a JV as it was 50% venture between PAC and CATIC.

Please explain those 50% input of pakistan please... atleast explain the 1%

 

[Paan Singh]

No we don't we call them JVs or projects with Chinese assistance. Look at the credit we give to the Chinese whenever their is a lunch ceremony for Al Khalid, JF 17 or FP-22 Frigates.

---------- Post added at 08:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:22 AM ----------



But their A$$es are not skinny

but u used word black......now u r running away from post

 

[Bossman]

Please explain those 50% input of pakistan please... atleast explain the 1%

why shoud I, I am not defending anything or thumping my chest. Go do your own research. There is enough on the net which is not classified.

 

[Paan Singh]

Please explain those 50% input of pakistan please... atleast explain the 1%

may be money and paint..it includes more than 1%....so ur point is wrong...

 

[Bossman]

but u used word black......now u r running away from post

I used skinny black. So it has to be black and skinny