You are right, Idol Worship exist in Dharmic religions. It doesn't mean Dharmic religiaon means only "Idol worship"..
Here is comparative diffrnce btwn Dharmic and Abrahmic religion.
From what I understand, there are deep, underlying differences in the philosophy of Abrahamic versus Dharmic religions. Abrahamic religions see time as an arrow that only points one way; each human gets one life to live; the world is created once and will be destroyed once; God gives missions to individuals and tribes that are meant to push towards this final apocalypse or salvation. The Dharmic religions, on the other hand, view time as being more cyclic. In Dharmic religions, people are reincarnated many times; reward and retribution are not administered all at once in a final afterlife, but rather in the course of many successive lives and "temporary afterlives." The same soul may experience karmic reward and karmic retribution. Even gods are reincarnated many times, meaning that even among celestial beings, no action or life is truly unique. Often in Dharmic religions, the world may even be created and destroyed cyclically.
In keeping with these general differences of viewing time as a one-way arrow versus an infinite cycle, the Abrahamic and Dharmic religions tend to emphasize different virtues. The Abrahamic religions tend to promote "action virtues," such as prosperity, achievement, authority, and of course evangelization. Conversely, the Dharmic religions tend to focus on serenity and acceptance. The Abrahamic teachings encourage humans to alter their world in the grand push towards the end of time, while the Dharmic religions encourage humans to accept a world that is more or less constant and eternally repeating.
The Dharmic religions also seem to put less emphasis on God as a human-like being with vested interest in events on Earth. In the Abrahamic religions, God is the central player, stern in his edicts. The Abrahamic God is also considered to be unflawed, an always-perfect being who has a perfect master plan. In the Dharmic religions, God may appear in many different incarnations, or not at all. Many interpretations of Buddhism are atheistic, a universe existing with certain moral laws and properties, but no human-like being overseeing the whole show. In Hinduism, many different incarnations of different gods and goddesses are all seen as emanations of the central consciousness of the universe; but all of those incarnations are in some way flawed, allowing them to be different from each other. Here, God does not take on the all-knowing, flawless, and actively planning role he does in the Abrahamic religions.
I just Quoted "the Greek historian Diodorus", I didn't know he was Hindutva Radical...
Diodorus Siculus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The fact:
There was a Dharmic temple in Kabba
Muhammad and his followers destroyed all idols, destroyed temples, captured Kabba and made it holy site of Islam.
I again said "I am just stating facts, I am not saying Muhammad did wrong or right".
May be possible you are right. May be there were wrong customs. But can you bring Historical proof?? don't quote some biased religious script to substantiate your words. Nakedness is not wrong, humanity start with nakedness.
If your fable is right, then Historian Diodorus was wrong, Both can't be right same time. This is just your belief, there is no Historical or Logical proof that Such Hazrat ever existed.
Again this is your personal view, What you call filth we call it Idol and we worship it. This is what you are brainwashed for.
I am not judging your Prophet (for me he was just another religion creator), I am just stating the facts. and the Fact is
The fact:
There was a Dharmic temple in Kabba
Muhammad and his followers destroyed all idols, destroyed temples, captured Kabba and made it holy site of Islam.
This Maulna is following his prophet path...
I again said "I am just stating facts, I am not saying Muhammad did wrong or right".