Despite Flaws, India to Induct Tejas Mark-1A Fighter

[scientien]

Some one please list down tejas mk1A specs all and also mention first flight its estimated ioc foc and date of induction also planned number of aircraft induction per year .

 

[nik22]

Some one please list down tejas mk1A specs all and also mention first flight its estimated ioc foc and date of induction also planned number of aircraft induction per year .

Even ADA/HAL may not have all the details you asked. These are just internet warriors !
BTW, what spec you are really interested in? Changes happening in 1A are mentioned + Tejas Mk1 configuration

 

[scientien]

Even ADA/HAL may not have all the details you asked. These are just internet warriors !
BTW, what spec you are really interested in? Changes happening in 1A are mentioned + Tejas Mk1 configuration

Range increased different missile integration and total number of mk1p to be inducted.

 

[nForce]

yeah.. they should do it. and yes, despite flaws, as long as it does not endanger the life of the pilot during his flight.

I have been part of multiple projects, some of them pretty ambitious ones, and I think I understand the difference between objectives and reality.

We want to achieve something and due to numerous constraints, it may not always be possible. But, in order to keep the process running, we will have to find a middle ground and launch the product, which will give us real experience and that is how we make progress. We dont stop there, we continuously strive to make it better. It is a never-ending process.

 

[mpk1988]

yeah.. they should do it. and yes, despite flaws, as long as it does not endanger the life of the pilot during his flight.

I have been part of multiple projects, some of them pretty ambitious ones, and I think I understand the difference between objectives and reality.

We want to achieve something and due to numerous constraints, it may not always be possible. But, in order to keep the process running, we will have to find a middle ground and launch the product, which will give us real experience and that is how we make progress. We dont stop there, we continuously strive to make it better. It is a never-ending process.

Exactly !!!

 

[I M Sikander]

FOC has nothing to do with order..

JF-17 is yet to get IOC and yet,PAF has already inducted some 50.

Your reply is of typical lca fan boy. Who always speak without fact and figure and reference.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Your reply is of typical lca fan boy. Who always speak without fact and figure and reference.

I hate to call OSCAR each time I've to prove this..so why don't you give a PM.he'll let you know.

 

[dadeechi]

yeah.. they should do it. and yes, despite flaws, as long as it does not endanger the life of the pilot during his flight.

I have been part of multiple projects, some of them pretty ambitious ones, and I think I understand the difference between objectives and reality.

We want to achieve something and due to numerous constraints, it may not always be possible. But, in order to keep the process running, we will have to find a middle ground and launch the product, which will give us real experience and that is how we make progress. We dont stop there, we continuously strive to make it better. It is a never-ending process.

Yupp! and it is called "Agile" Methodology. Seems like IAF was stuck with "Waterfall" all along.

 

[Luca1]

FOC has nothing to do with order..

JF-17 is yet to get IOC and yet,PAF has already inducted some 50.

Any proof on this assertion?

 

[Beta-Fighter]

I understood it. Was just in light mood. Anyway, everyone has their own interpretation. He has reasons to believe JF 17 was not inducted due to dislikeness or incompetent and we have reasons not to.

Pakistan inducted F16s according to its requirement but maybe F 16 was not suited for India.

Its about not Suited its was failed in test which IAF test all planes , including Tejas and F-16 . So F-16 is also a failed plane for IAF , but its a star plane for PAF, like Tejas may not be a good plane for them but for PAF it more powerful plane.

Any proof on this assertion?

Yep, No LGB's , No cannon , etc .... any proof u have it got FOC?

 

[GR!FF!N]

Any proof on this assertion?

ask oscar..I've lost the link where he quoted it recently.

and yes,Order has nothing to do with FOC.F-35 didn't get FOC before it clinched an estimated order over 1500.

 

[trident2010]

Very good decision. It will give IAF ample time to feel the machine and improve it gradually.

 

[farhan_9909]

Anyone involved in this project should be sentenced for life in jail and India should call off any sort of diplomatic relations with france and sue dassault for handing them a design taking 1/3rd of a century to complete.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Anyone involved in this project should be sentenced for life in jail and India should call off any sort of diplomatic relations with france and sue dassault for handing them a design taking 1/3rd of a century to complete.

1/3rd of a century ago the design agency for the plane, or India's mil aerospace R&D wing didnt even exist. Let alone full funding to actually produce it. What are you babbling about?

 

[Ronin]

Now try and sell it internationally
Build scale to ramp volumes