Dalai Lama
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,628
- Reaction score
- -25
- Country
- Location
Man, mood is romantic in this thread!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are welcomed my brother
even I was too banned, every one goes through a phase of learning to get seasoned and to accept how the real world is and to be the change we wish to bring arround us.Ashok what is really funny is i reckon he has been a naughty boy for at least a month and was banned! lolz
I like Democracy
stop making me laugh my brotherHope democracy likes you then marriage can happen and you can have a load of baby democracies!!! lol
You may not. But I wonder who started this thread and created the title.I had never in my post said that its a failed experiment. neither did Aryan, but we are questioning on how it can evolve with taking in more concepts from other form of governance.
As you are a native English speaker, i have no doubt about your comprehension skills, but are we not writing our words clearly that you are not able to comprehend
Nice copy/paste job wherever that came from.The versions of democracy that we have in existance and that the west wish to propagate is nothing more than an anaesthtic to soothe their collective conscience and propogate the myth that they are civilised.
You may not. But I wonder who started this thread and created the title.
Nice copy/paste job wherever that came from.
Actually Gambit it is a phrase that I thought up when I was doing law in my first year in the UK. It was a legal research exercise on Judge bias and the famous Pinochet (2) in the House of Lords in the UK. The copy from my dissertation:You may not. But I wonder who started this thread and created the title.
Nice copy/paste job wherever that came from.
Did I say so ? Still...All you are doing is the typical intellectually dishonest tactic of pointing out the errors of the applications of democratic institutions without providing a shred of credible argument as to a better alternative. Dishonest critics like you put an impossible demand upon 'democracy' and 'capitalism':
- Instant equality, as if a new law or idea would change decades or hundreds of years of internalized biases,
- Instant wealth, as if 'wealth' could be universally defined in the first place,
- Instant perfect government, as if people in governments are saints to start,
- Instant honesty, as if people in governments are saints to start,
- Instant efficiency in governance, as if people in governments are saints to start and that they could defy the laws of nature,
- Instant this and instant that and instant those...
But when the table is turned to you, we can see the spinning begins on how communism in X country was not 'true communism' or that it is the fault of corruption or that it was the CIA-Zionist alliance and so on...
No wonder critics like you are not taken seriously.
Sorry...We never claimed to be looking for an all-wise and 'benevolent dictator' like you advocated Pakistan should do.
You sir, dont know how democracy works. Period. Your illogical biased rantings pretty much sum up your knowledge. You are confusing a democractic process with problems with governance or economics.
Lol. There is no such thing as "your democracy" or "our democracy". Period. You sir, need a crash course in "Democracy for Dummies". Again I repeat my question, if you think democracy is a farce, please suggest a better alternative method of governance where peoples rights are respected.