I would go to the extent of saying that Brahmins have enjoyed far more political power under Congress dispensations ( where the backward classes have usually had only token representation in the ruling elite) than under the BJP ( which has put several backwards , including Modi, in real leadership roles).
That is a very intelligent point, but the counter to that lies within your knowledge of Indian politics, beyond a doubt.
If you care to consider, it has always been that the BJP has acted as a political grouping of RSS people, the RSS considering the thrust and cut of electoral politics to be an undignified occupation not appropriate for cultured and educated people who prided themselves on their standing aloof from positions where corruption was a constant temptation. If you stop to consider the BJP leadership, you are indeed right to consider the eclectic leadership that they have received. If you turn to the RSS, however, the picture is radically different. And therein lies the key to your puzzle.
There was no India before 15th August 1947.
Pakistan was born before India was born.
There was, in fact, India from 1858 onwards, constituted as a state. Please don't waste everybody's time flaunting your ignorance. Go and read up first.
There was no India before 15th August 1947.
Pakistan was born before India was born.
That was the Dominion of Pakistan, and it was born on the 15th of August, 1947, the date granted by the legislation governing the act in the British Parliament, irrespective of the date on which it was celebrated.
Iqbal was, is and will always be a Pakistani.
He was born Indian, in 1877, and died Indian, in 1938.
