The entire selection process, like in any democratic institution goes through a systematic refining system. Well respected posters nominate members with potential, good debating and writing skill with modestly acknowledged reputation for not abusing others and then, the names again go through a thorough scrutiny where other members expresses their personal views on those names before the final names come out. So in a way, it is not difficult to understand that the privileged title holders have already gone through a few sets of close inspections. So, as some dissensions are already there, doubting the capability of the TTAs may not be well founded in most of the cases.Hi,
@WebMaster @ADMINISTRATOR
I am starting this thread to bring out the names of Think Tank members who have not started a meaningful thread in the last 30 days or those who have not participated in their Think Tank position in a healthy conversation either.
I would like the members to participate and bring out the names of the TT's who don't fill in their roles.
Thank you.
But personally I feel, writing well researched articles must be the most essential criteria for holding a place that ordinary members can not fill up. For personal reasons, I have not been able to meet that very requirement which I believe is the single most necessary quality one TTA should and must possess. Neither I want to keep myself on gunpoint at the end of every thirty days. So, I wholeheartedly support this motion.
Last edited: