bloo
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 2,516
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Such a long delay can only be attributed to incompetence, corruption and complacency.
"Incompetence, corruption and complacency", slogan of congress.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Such a long delay can only be attributed to incompetence, corruption and complacency.
Who are you BTW? Are you some big boss who Indian Navy needs to report to after every single test or modifications done?Must you pre-empt and counter question when you have no pertinent answers?
These forum tactics are very old, come with something new.
What I said is the following:
If the Arihant is operational, what torpedoes is it carrying?
Were those torpedoes fired from INS Arihant during weapons trial?
Must you pre-empt and counter question when you have no pertinent answers?
These forum tactics are very old, come with something new.
What I said is the following:
If the Arihant is operational, what torpedoes is it carrying?
Were those torpedoes fired from INS Arihant during weapons trial?
Depends, Must you ask questions, the answers to which are not available on an online forum.
Can you even tell us if and what torpedoes did Indian Navy kilo or HDW or Foxtrot class submarine fire during its sea trials?
pray tell me, why INS Arihant can not be armed with Set 65, T-53 or T-71/76 torpedoes, the standard torpedo armaments of Indian navy?
It's a legit link. Never happened to me with NIE link.Just tried to click the Source of this news and it lead to a random “congratulations you’ve just won xyz” Page.
Can someone please verify if this is just me or is that the case for others as well.
Gracias in advance!
Given that fact Indian test of JL-2 SLBM in 2004 failed, more reason for India not to do soIndia is hopefully responsible enough to not mount any nukes on any SLBM on Arihant, just in case that sub exploded with the nukes onboard.
On 02 December 2004 Bill Gertz reported that China conducted tests of the JL-2 in 2002 and 2003. The Chinese suffered a setback in the JL-2 missile program when a test flight of the JL-2 missile failed in the summer of 2004. The JL-2 missile program was delayed by the test failure but is continuing to be developed.
Corruption certainly yesSuch a long delay can only be attributed to incompetence, corruption and complacency.
Check the (apx) 300 messages along with media input here:
INS Arihant : Updates & Discussion
Simple question is not being answered and that is, if at all some torpedoes were fired by INS Arihant during its weapon trials, or not?
For such simple thing you do not have to take a refuge in classified material exercise, just because INS Arihant's picture is available and so is the picture of its nuclear reactor and several other things, hence classified material factor is not applicable here. period. Rest is your cunning tactics:
View attachment 442940
Now
Before:
See how moron you look now?
Given that fact Indian test of JL-2 SLBM in 2004 failed, more reason for India not to do so
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/china/jl-2.htm
Corruption certainly yes
Given the fact India's $1.3 trillion losses due to corruption
It's a legit link. Never happened to me with NIE link.
So it's likely a malware on your device/browser.
Guess then China's second strike is its final nail in its coffinMissiles may failed in the test phase. But JL-2 is now operational.
India , however, have the only sub that ever exploded while docked. That is unprecedented in modern history.
Never realized CPC has censored Kursk submarine disasterSubs are lost during trials or exercises. But India is the only country to lost a sub while docked....
All fake. Ming class is an Indian submarineYou mean we can beat Chinese in poor workmanship like that of this incident >>>> Chinese submarine 361 (Ming-class submarine) that killed all 70 crew members on board in 2003 might kickstart your brain dead memory perhaps ??
Guess then China's second strike is its final nail in its coffin
Never realized CPC has censored Kursk submarine disaster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kursk_submarine_disaster
All fake. Ming class is an Indian submarine
Check the (apx) 300 messages along with media input here:
INS Arihant : Updates & Discussion
Simple question is not being answered and that is, if at all some torpedoes were fired by INS Arihant during its weapon trials, or not?
For such simple thing you do not have to take a refuge in classified material exercise, just because INS Arihant's picture is available and so is the picture of its nuclear reactor and several other things, hence classified material factor is not applicable here. period. Rest is your cunning tactics:
View attachment 442940
Now
Before:
See how moron you look now?
A Western propaganda of course.
All Chinese subs are self-driving since 1949.
Firstly Set 65, T-53 or T-71/76 are the standard torpedoes operated by Indian navy. It is just an assumption that these torpedo arm the Indian navy submarine arm. As to knowledge which torpedo was fired from which submarine, either during sea trials or during naval exercises or if it all they were fired, is not public knowlege.
Similarly if, which or how many torpedoes were fired by INS Arihant during which phase of trial is not public knowledge either.
And Just like, you wont find a document detailing the firing exercises carried by Indian navy's diesel submarines during their sea trials, do not cast a doubt on the diesel submarines operational status. Inability to find a document detailing the INS arihant sea trials should not cast doubts to it operational status either.
Simply put it is not public knowledge.