sovcomflot
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 696
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
India supports Russia
India has supported the Russian proposal to keep Syrian stockpiles of chemical weapons in safe custody while pointing out that its two main postulates — no to military intervention and move toward a political settlement, possibly with a Geneva-II conference — remained unchanged.
In its standard formulation, India said it would prefer acknowledged chemical weapons stockpiles to be destroyed and, pending their elimination, to be kept in safe custody.
“If there are any proposals which are moving in this direction, then obviously India will see it as a positive development,” said spokesperson in the External Affairs Ministry Syed Akbaruddin on Tuesday.
The Indian stand has been spelt out in considerable detail over the past few days. First by the Foreign Office a week back when it categorically ruling out a military solution to the conflict and supported the move to hold an international conference on Syria (Geneva-II) involving the Syrian government and various opposition factions.
At a time when the threat of a U.S.-led military strike was at its height, the Foreign Office counselled patience till the U.N. inspectors had submitted their report. The U.N. team was in Damascus on a Syrian government request to probe a chemicals weapons attack, allegedly by the rebels, earlier this year.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh reiterated this formulation during a dinner on September 5 at the St Petersburg G-20 summit. India was not in favour of armed action aimed at regime change as this would be violation of international law. And action, if necessary, should be authorised by the U.N. Security Council, he said joining his voice with Presidents of Russia, China, Indonesia, Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa in speaking against military action not authorised by the U.N. Security Council.
Wasn't the destruction of chemical weapons one of the objectives of the western alliance. India 's foreign policy is in line with West.Remove Congress ,or else there will be trouble in future.USA is least reliable. Look at the recent actions of Iran towards India. I hope you understand that.
Sadly ,Russia has done this to save Assad.But I wouldn't be surprised if Russian teams in Syria are armed with nukes.
Assad: We have weapons that could blindside Israel | The Times of Israel
Assad told Al-Akhbar that the level of Syrian cooperation and coordination with Russia was “unprecedented” and that should a US attack on Syria occur — a possibility he did not rule out — he had Moscow’s assurances that Russian forces would be sent to back the regime.
“We have a full Russian pledges that Russian troops will enter in any war waged against Syria,” he was quoted as saying.
Changing Russia relations:-
If the deals go through, it will be for the first time in a decade that Russia has delivered offensive weapons to China.
It will also mark the first time that Russia has supplied China with more powerful weapon platforms compared with Russian-built systems India has in its arsenals. In the past, the opposite was the rule.
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/milita...-better-weapons-than-india.html#ixzz2gSDqmUlk
India sides with Wahabbis and decides to protect them via defence pact :
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's visit to Oman and Qatar, days before his departure for the G20 meeting in Washington, has given India a strategic toehold in the Gulf — two agreements on defence and security have been signed with Qatar, a country that is home to a US naval base. Short of having a permanent station in Doha, India will be ready to go calling whenever Qatari assets need protection. - See more at: Security pact with Qatar gives India Gulf toehold - Indian Express
Aren't the wahabbis the reason muslims are rioting in india? Wahabbis are sponsoring terror in Kashmir. So why India is protecting wahabbis?
There is no independent foreign policy of India. India is just a stooge of USA and Wahabbis now. Remove congress by any means or mark my words,India is in for trouble.