As was the case when Pakistan requested FB to restrict access to those blasphemous pages. FB complied, twitter didnt and only then twitter was briefly censored.
Oh BTW, the orders to restrict access to blasphemous content were based on Court Orders unlike the case here, which most websites (including FB and Twitter) as a policy agrees to comply with.
Later Twitter also gave the following statement: "it's Twitter's policy is to comply with local court orders regarding content, but it received no such notice from Pakistan" (a separate debate), but the fact remains that had GOI issued any notice to these websites to remove the 'communally sensitive' content and still if the website didnt comply, the blocking was justified, but that isnt the case now.