What's new

Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

So there is constitutional remedies to stop such Acts. IS he been slapped no,or its first time its happening. I have see similar protest during Tasleema Nasreen Story but the difference was only in colour saffron was substituted with Green
I do know that there constitutional remedies to stop such acts but were they right in the first place?

He will be replied back in appropriate way. Did you hear latest SRK interview?
Oh...! So you mean this way?
12289613_10153234436323372_1348093061152555983_n.jpg


Anyways jokes apart, Is harming him physically the appropriate way in your opinion?
 
The sun is shining brightly. Donkeys are seen carrying mud for construction of a hut in a corner of the village. Youngsters have huddled together to show each other the latest Bollywood movie they got downloaded in the lanes of Uldhan village, 12 km from Meerut city. The village appears normal, but the house which welcomes every visitor to Uldhan village, has not moved much for the last one and a half years. It is the house of Kaleem, who, till late last year, was branded “head of a jihadi gang” and ostracised.

When this correspondent went to the house, Kaleem was found sitting in a corner of the bed in the dilapidated drawing room which stands out, rather shabbily in the evolving rural architecture of village. The dim sunlight coming through the gaps of the closed window at the end of the room, makes it difficult for anybody to see his face. Kaleem has been sitting like this since he was granted bail six months ago.

In late June last year, police arrested Kaleem. He was later told that a case of gang-rape and forced conversion was filed against him and his friends, by the father of the girl he was having an affair with. The girl belonged to the majority community from Kharkhauda village, some two km from his house. He had arranged for a job of English teacher for his girlfriend in the local Madarsa. Hours after the case was filed and carried very prominently by the vernacular Hindi press, putting western Uttar Pradesh on the boil. The Sangh Parivar and affiliated groups took up the case as a textbook example of “love jihad” — an Islamist conspiracy to lure and convert Hindu women.

But three months later, in October last year, Tyagi’s daughter, 22, went to police alleging that she was forced by her parents to charge her Muslim lover with rape and conversion out of greed for money from a local BJP leader. She told the police that she had gone with Kaleem out of her own will and later also filed a case against her parents. She is expected to record her fresh statement before the judge very soon.

Kaleem tells this correspondent that the “love jihad” controversy took a toll on his life and that of the girl he fell in love with, who is at present staying in ‘Naari niketan,’ the government shelter house for women.

Kaleem got bail in May this year, a fact which the local Hindi media chose to ignore. When this correspondent went to meet him, he did not want to interact with “anyone from media which made a terrorist out of him.”

“I do not know what was my fault. We just fell in love. We are adults and we had the right and we still do have, to decide what to do with our lives,” adds Kaleem.

“But I fail to understand why our love was projected as ‘love jihad’ and I was branded head of some terrorist group,” he adds and it is when his father Aadil enters the drawing room and asks him to leave.

“Because of the propaganda and politics I had to go to jail.. All because people wanted to thrust their own interpretation of this world on us,” he adds while referring to the way his relationship with a girl of the majority community was sensationalised by the Hindi press and the Hindutva groups. Asked more about the case, Kaleem who had to drop out of his BA course from a local college due to his arrest, said, “I will have to start from scratch.”

‘False allegations’

At this juncture, Aadil, sounding upset, said, “They made my son a terrorist when the girl’s father, out of greed for money from a political leader, went to police and levelled false charges on him. But since the time she exposed her father’s claims and declared the reality, the Hindi press has gone completely silent.”

Interestingly, even the girl’s father regretted forcing his choice on her daughter who fell in love with a Muslim boy of the neighbouring village.

“After all that happened with my daughter, I do think, it should not have happened. Somewhere, it is my fault also to force my choices on her and allow her life to become a political tamasha,” he told The Hindu whe
 
I do know that there constitutional remedies to stop such acts but were they right in the first place?
Is he is been Harmed Big No, ShivSena is Politically Elected Entity Just Like AMIM Its there way of Politics they will play it
 
Dear amir khan, majority Indians are tolerant... but minorities are always intolerant.. just like ranjeet who spends too much time on Pdf to show how much he hate other religions... always spits venom on other religions... being puny how can you become star. ... PM can spread yoga to the world... Iscan can work in Russian fed and the rest of world... baba ram dev can buy island in Europe to spread Hinduism... How can you stay in India being a muslim actor... you are not Advani, if you are no one would dare to respond like this way... you are not president to talk about intolerance... so shut up and pack your bags...
 
Aamir Khan is not your tolerance project. Get over him, read the constitution--today is a good day to do it.


Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity


Lol... India is secular only because its majority religion inherently holds a view that every religion is equal and the ultimate aim of every religion is to reach god. This country was secular even before 1976, when the word was added to the constitution of India. This country will remain secular even after the word is remove from the constitution. The author should first learn the cultural ethos of India, before teaching its citizens about some stupid lines written in the constitution that hold no resemblance with the pseudo-secular elites that filled up the intellectual positions in this nation.
 
First the Muslims enslave us and beat the f#@& out of us, destroying our temples and wiping out our inferior race. Then they create their own country and continually slaughter hundreds of us through terrorist proxies. Now they're saying WE'RE intolerant?
 
Lol... India is secular only because its majority religion inherently holds a view that every religion is equal and the ultimate aim of every religion is to reach god. This country was secular even before 1976, when the word was added to the constitution of India. This country will remain secular even after the word is remove from the constitution. The author should first learn the cultural ethos of India, before teaching its citizens about some stupid lines written in the constitution that hold no resemblance with the pseudo-secular elites that filled up the intellectual positions in this nation.
Only difference is today people know who are intolerant and who teach intolerance because of communication and social media.


Calling Indians intolerant is not an issue but before making the statements one had to check their communities ,what they teach how they divide humanity into two groups, and how they are trying to ridicule local traditions.

Before pointing fingers at others they should first make sure they are not following the same
This is the issue with Abrahamic religions they will teach intolerance and they expect others to give away theirs faith and traditions.

Some of these people are even allergic to local traditions.
Any way constitution will be the supreme authority and it will remain like that in future.
 
Last edited:
He said "Intolerance is on the rise" and never said that "India is intolerant", so dude please differentiate between the two.

If that's the case, some other religions in India are already intolerant. Why doesnt he make a show on that?
See in this light. Seeing appeasement for so long, Hindu community is waking up and asking for protection of their rights. Whats wrong in it? If asking for protection of their rigthts is Intolerance then let it be.
One incident of Dadri can never make India intolerant.

As I said before "Tell 100 times U saw a ghost, 101st time others will believe there is a ghost"
 
What sort of victim playing is this ?

I nearly died laughing.I wonder whether they missed the wonderful movie "Sarfarosh"...

Who can forget what lesson Inspector Salim(Mukesh Rishi) taught ACP Ajoy Rathor(Aamir Khan)??
 
Is he is been Harmed Big No, ShivSena is Politically Elected Entity Just Like AMIM Its there way of Politics they will play it
He wasn't harmed because he was out of their reach and what does Shiv Sena being elected entity speak of and what are you trying to imply?

If that's the case, some other religions in India are already intolerant. Why doesnt he make a show on that?
See in this light. Seeing appeasement for so long, Hindu community is waking up and asking for protection of their rights. Whats wrong in it? If asking for protection of their rigthts is Intolerance then let it be.
One incident of Dadri can never make India intolerant.

As I said before "Tell 100 times U saw a ghost, 101st time others will believe there is a ghost"
So what intolerance have you seen in other religions and where was the appeasement?

Lol... India is secular only because its majority religion inherently holds a view that every religion is equal and the ultimate aim of every religion is to reach god. This country was secular even before 1976, when the word was added to the constitution of India. This country will remain secular even after the word is remove from the constitution. The author should first learn the cultural ethos of India, before teaching its citizens about some stupid lines written in the constitution that hold no resemblance with the pseudo-secular elites that filled up the intellectual positions in this nation.
India is secular because of its constitution, Different parts of India were ruled by different Kings and each patronized their local beliefs and traditions. What does that speak of? Was that secularism? What do you have to say about the ill-treatment of Dalits all through our history? Was it secularism?
 
Apparently Amir Khan left "Tolerant democratic" India after a court case was filed against him for "Hurting Hindu feelings"
 
India is secular because of its constitution,
What was India between 1947 - 1976 then ? a non-secular nation ?

Different parts of India were ruled by different Kings and each patronized their local beliefs and traditions. What does that speak of? Was that secularism?

I hope this video helps you. watch from 0.50 secs where modi explains the hindu ethos and how this nation respected the religious beliefs of other citizens..


What do you have to say about the ill-treatment of Dalits all through our history? Was it secularism?

what does secularism has to do with dalits ??
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom