gubbi
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2009
- Messages
- 4,536
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
A program is beginning that would give American teen series fighters this capability, albeit in a somewhat unusual way
Now what would that be? Any idea?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A program is beginning that would give American teen series fighters this capability, albeit in a somewhat unusual way
Boeing to offer more powerful engines for F-18 to India
Boeing has offered the Indian air force a more powerful new version of the General Electric F414 engine to bolster its bid to sell 126 F/A-18E/Fs for the medium multi-role combat aircraft programme.
Paul Oliver, Boeings senior director for international business development, confirms the F414 enhanced performance engine (EPE) was submitted as part of Boeings proposal to win the MMRCA contract.
Boeing first revealed plans for the Super Hornet engine upgrade last May, but declined at that time to confirm the EPE would be formally offered to the Indian air force.
The US Navy conceived the upgrade a few years ago as an enhanced durability engine, with new materials and designs to bolster its service life. Subsequently, Boeing and GE teamed up to add a 20% increase in thrust by improving the engines hot section. Both the durability and thrust improvements will be included in the EPE package.
Boeing also is discussing the EPE upgrade with potential new Super Hornet customers, such as Brazil, and existing operators like the USN. The USN has yet to make even the enhanced durability part of the EPE upgrade a funded programme for the Super Hornet.
Boeing is competing for the MMRCA deal against rival bids by the Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Lockheed Martin F-16IN, RSK MiG-35 and Saab Gripen
Boeing to offer more powerful engines for F-18 to India IDRW.ORG
That's wrong, Germany and France are the powers behind EADS, Britain/BAE is only a smaller part behing Airbus which is a subsidiary company of EADS. That's why France for sure will offer EADS products, or jv combined with the Rafale offer, like they did in Brazil too (Eurocopter helicopters, partnership on Embraers transport aircraft development).Politically, France(and Sweden) will sell to anybody that can buy it without restrictions, and have a nasty habit of having second thoughts during conflicts. US and Russia are relatively safe options.
Now that's a strange comment, isn't it US that posed sanctions on India and prefered Pakistan for years. Now that money and a big market is available US is ready to give us anything. France sells to both too, but they were reliable during sanctions and supported Indias permenant seat in the UN.
Britain is the most influential member of the EADS consortium and has strong relations with India.
But MMRCA will be the main frontline aircraft alongside MKI, so it's performance against PAF, or PLAAF fighters will be a main requirement too, don't you think? That's why I said, the US weapon pack will be a bigger advantage, than the slow speed capabilities. But these weapons are available on F16IN and most of the Eurocarnards too.I was talking about speeds during aerial engagements not the mission profiles of the aircrafts. Delta wings have both positive and negative features/characteristics. In any case the Superhornet's performance especially at low speeds is excellent.
Agreed, but there are also more points where thr Rafale is better t/w ratio, logistics, ToT, co-developments and even some arms. The Rafale itself and the whole deal offers imo the best alround performance. Many good points in not only some parts, but several different parts.They found the Rafale handles better. That's only one facet of the aircraft.
Sure, but you are forgetting Scalp cruise missile, AASM, later Meteor which are latest weapons comparable, or even better and don't forget that some US weapons are cleared for Rafale too (as far as I know, Paveway bombs, Harm and Harpoon and if customers wants also Aim 9 and AMRAAM).Getting access to the US munitions inventory would be a far bigger draw than being able to integrate MICAs and Exocets to the aircraft. In any case, the aircraft can be wired to accept most munitions if requested by the IAF
That's what I said, US developed such kits earlier and now in huge numbers, that's why they are cheaper. AASM with 1 CEP versions is better and only in the first stages of the development, so it has a greater potential.JDAMs with the DAMASK seeker(production started in 2007) have a CEP of 3m without GPS assistance. Also, the LJDAM can hit mobile units.
The JDAM deliveries started in 1997 as opposed to the AASM which started being delivered in 2007. Which only goes to illustrate how the US military in general has always been ahead of the curve.
UAE 60, that alone woulde be 3 times more than Super Hornets for foreign operators, not to mention 100+ from Brazil and India eachWell the only significant orders are likely to come from Brazil or India. In Brazil, Embraer has clearly stated a preference for the Gripen NG(giving it the opportunity to be more involved in the development) while the Rafale doesn't seem to have a better-than-average shot at the Indian MRCA contract.
Sure, they only wanted the inferior Growler. No mate, America don't like to share such techs.Australia didn't get only a light version, the RAAF ordered all its F-18E/Fs in a Growler-lite configuration.
I like the EF too, but it is too obvious that it won't be fully developed soon and that it will face further delays. That is not exactable for IAF at such a high unit cost, for Saudi Arabia instead, whithout a real threat and as shiny toys they will be good.BTW, I'd personally like the IAF to opt for the Eurofighter, not the SH or Rafale, but I don't think that's going to happen. With the delay that this contract has gone through, it would make better sense to go for the best one on offer. At least the marginal gain in potency will offset the more-than-probable delays in future IAF orders.
Try to understand that the Superhornet is a base Hornet with improvements. The Hornet had not enough range and speed, that's why the SH is bigger now and has more internal fuel, also the air intakes was redesigned to be big enough for the upgraded GE414 engine.I'm not saying that RCS reducing measures aren't there on the EF and Rafale. But, the idea that the Rafale is stealthier than an SH is flawed.
Visible stealth features on Rafale:
Serrated area (airframe, Inlets)
48* leading edge sweep.
IR Superssion for M88.
S-shaped inlet, M88 vanes, 5th generation core system architecture
The F414 enhanced performance engine (EPE) includes an all new core and forward fan to dramatically increase the fighter's takeoff performance, said Bob Gower, Boeing vice president for F/A-18E/F.
The improvements would increase the F414 thrust rating from 22,000lbs to 26,600lbs. The baseline F414-GE-400, which also powers the Saab Gripen demonstration aircraft, is itself a 35% higher thrust version of the F404 and entered service with the Super Hornet fleet in 1998.
Boeing held a meeting last week in India and said that they are offering the GE F 414 EPE engine for the Indian SH which increases the thrust per engine from 98KN to 118KN+ or 196 KN per aircraft to 236KN+, the same engine is also being offered for the LCA's mk-2 engine contest where the EJ2000 and GE F414 EPE will go head to head. EJ2000 is offering MATV however the thrust is 90KN just enough for the LCA mk-2 while Ge's F 414 EPE has a lot more thrust, but is also slightly heavier. the new GE engine reduces the fuel burn of the SH by 1%. Engine change can be done in less than 30mins and engines are left and right interchangeable. EJ2000 on the other hand boasts engine change in 45 mins. The EJ is also much more expensive with the engine costing over 10 million while the GE 414 comes for around half that. Boeing is also offering a 9-G superhornet unlike the USN's 7.5 g aircraft, this will require changes to the flight control system.
@dore00011
what the **** is this, turning the thread to advertising board.