Agnostic_Indian
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2010
- Messages
- 3,102
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
self delete....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great.
Now the chocolaty Superbug fangirl is going to be angry on this.
I think now the EF is leading. The IAF chief had commented today that the negotiations for the Mirage upgrade was a difficult one..so it will be in back of the head regarding Rafale.
Great.
Now the chocolaty Superbug fangirl is going to be angry on this.
I think now the EF is leading. The IAF chief had commented today that the negotiations for the Mirage upgrade was a difficult one..so it will be in back of the head regarding Rafale.
Great.
Now the chocolaty Superbug fangirl is going to be angry on this.
I think now the EF is leading. The IAF chief had commented today that the negotiations for the Mirage upgrade was a difficult one..so it will be in back of the head regarding Rafale.
Hi Spark, as I said yesterday, that is an Ajai Shukla article, so should be taken carefully!
From all what we know (and what I've heared) the F18SH had some issues, but one thing is for sure, at least 1 US fighter will be shortlisted for sure, either for political reasons, or simply to put pressure on the Europeans.
However, lets assume it's really about EF and Rafale, it is also clear which fighter is prefered by whom!
EF offers - the best offset package, at least equal ToT, political advantages of 4 partner countries (although only Germany and UK are on a level with France)
It's undeniabley the choice of the industry and politics!
Rafale offers - commonality to present IAF fleet, already placed logistics, maintenance and support routes, ease in training pilots and ground crews, clearly the better multi role capabilities and is more mature.
Which makes it the obvious choice for IAF and with the advantage of commonality and reduced costs at higher numbers, also for IN. More over, the fact that Rafale has a lower unit cost and needs less additional upgrades will should be a point that makes finance ministry happy.
So when it's up between these two, Rafale is L1 and offers the most advantages for our forces, while EF offers better industrial and "possibly" (UK, ITA and to some extend Germany are highly bound to US) more political advantages.
There is enough room for Rafale..if they reduce price+free upgrade for Mk2
Mirage 2000N
The Mirage 2000N is the nuclear strike variant which was intended to carry the Aerospatiale Air-Sol Moyenne Portee (ASMP) nuclear stand-off missile. Initial flight tests of two prototypes began on February 3, 1983, and the Mirage 2000N entered operational service in 1988. A total of 75 were built.
The fighter had strengthened wings for low-altitude operations, as well as low-level precision navigation/attack systems, built around the Dassault/Thales Antilope 5 radar, which was designed for the strike role and featured a terrain-avoidance capability.
The ASMP missile is 5.38 meters long with a kerosene-powered ramjet that allows it to cruise at Mach 3 to a maximum range of 100 km carrying a nuclear warhead with a yield of 300 kT.
Cost of Mirage upgrade was never a concern to me..We are getting damn good deal ..We should not just make opinions on half known facts..
46-Minutes, 9G In A Rafale
Just did a 46-minute sortie in a Rafale at Yelahanka, and have been informed that I'm the first Indian civilian to fly in the fighter. I flew with a Dassault test pilot. Photographer Vishal Jolapara has taken some truly stunning pictures of my flight, which I'll post shortly. And I'll post in detail about the flight later tonight.