nightrider_saulat
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,054
- Reaction score
- 0
i think you people should go for mig-35,that is why because of your three decades long experience on fulcrums
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But unless this don't offer any advantages for IAF, so not a good choice.i think you people should go for mig-35,that is why because of your three decades long experience on fulcrums
But unless this don't offer any advantages for IAF, so not a good choice.
Rafale has no TVC, EF could get it, but with their delta canard design they belong to the most manouverable fighters even without this tech.i think it's TVC is among the best engines available today in the world
i think even better then those of rafale and eurofighter
Look at the Rafale price In FX-2 bid in Brazil it will come at $174 Million.
Focus should be on Gripen now.
No, besides the Mig 35 only the EF could offer this capability, but as I said, it won't be an important point anyway.is gripen TVC capable
SAAB has some projects of fitting the EJ230 in the future and ITP of Spain (partner of Eurojet GmbH) said that it has designed a TVC nozzle for the Gripen airframe. The problem with re-engining Gripen with EJ200 is logistics support and minor changes in the interface connections are necessary.
Saab has years ago already investigated the technical and operational
feasibility for re-engineering JAS 39 Gripen with the EJ200 engine.
Both Saab and EUROJET Turbo GmbH concluded that a re-engineering only
shall be considered if there is a customer demand available. From a
technical point of view, the EJ200 engine would fit into the engine bay
of JAS39 Gripen with minor changes applied to the interface connections.
The commercial feasibility of re-engineering JAS39 Gripen would be
supported, if required, by individual business case calculations.
The Thrust vectoring nozzle is offered as an optional item for any of
the EJ200 engine standards.
I hope this answer can help.
( i googled for answer)
With an good AESA, it would kick LCA MK2 on the same level with Gripen NG.
Of course that's why I said could, but think about what is on offer and compare it with the Gripen.Thats too early and to much speculation to assume it would .
Gripen NG has just left the testing board , and is a mature platform with demonstrated proof of capabilities .
Prateek -Look at the comparison of Missile that sums up what i am saying .
Python5 is not even integrated , ASTRA is still away from operational capability while Gripen has fired AMRAAM/METEOR and ASRAAM/IRiS-T . You are comparing a Matured platform with Speculated specs , way too early .
Radar is not E/L 2052 , it will be LRDE product , 2052 has just been offered like Zhuk-AE . Its not final . Till then LRDE radar giving performance of VIXEN1000 is just speculation .
Engine is not finalized yet , you might very well see same Engine .
Let LCA2 leave drawing board , and you can compare them then.
What ever GripenNG we have seen is just a single demo NG tailored made for Indian tender , might be they will end up giving a machine of differnt calibre by the time LCA2 comes . Akin to Rafale block3 vs Block4.
That also brings a big question on LCA2 avionics suite , HUD whether frame-less or not .
What about Data-Links and their performance
IRST/FLIR performance .
Its just way too early to jump on conclusion that LCA2 will be at par with Gripen NG