banvanaxl
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 875
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
Even in Western societies which seems to be the bar for most young Indian males here on PDF they draw a line, certain behaviors elicit outrage. To say that a society has no features, no boundaries, and anything goes is certainly not how societies function.
Rituparno Ghosh or any another exceptions are always there in the society, but the point to note is they are exceptions, not the rule. India has generally been rather benign to such exceptions. We don't have a culture where we sit and plan on humiliating or making someones life miserable just because they are different from us, be it transvestites or homosexuals. But that certainly does not mean that households encourage their boys to wear lipsticks and bras.
I never implied a "anything goes' society. My contention is to live and let live. That is exactly why we have laws banning possession of firearms and laws banning use of recreational drugs etc etc. As long as individuals are not affected/harmed by my individual decision I believe that I should have the authority to carry on a lifestyle that I imagine is best suited for me.
So either encouraging or discouraging crossdressing is not in the purview of this discussion. An adult should have the liberty to choose within the aforesaid boundaries of letting others live.
Because you are not living in wilderness or on the surface of moon. You are part of a society which was formed after thousands of years of trials and errors. The wisdom contained in it did not come about by some quirk. Every single member of this society has a stake in keeping it livable. Antisocial attitudes or attitudes which could lead to destruction of society would be commented on and if needed legislated against. India's democracy is not a free for all lunatic asylum. There are rules and regulations, there are laws and conventions with a lot of freedom to innovate without blowing it up.
Fair enough. I would too frown upon a gal sporting a bikini at a board meeting. But where do you draw the line. Today you are liberal enough to allow me to wear say, sandals to work, tomorrow your replacement comes and tells me no sandals .. either wear dress shoes or you are out. Where do we draw the line when encroachment of private liberties are concerned ?
And it doesn't stop there. You ban something and you set a precedence. I'm sure you remember the case where a certain "ulema" in Lucknow banned anything other than a full hijab for women studying in Aligarh. When cornered he cited the example of another cleric doing the same in Old delhi and getting away with it. You set horrid precedences once you allow your personal liberties to be dictated by one person or a group of people at any given time.
Anyway on topic. I hope both you and I can at least agree that movies and how a lady dresses has nothing to with with rape.
Cheers
lmao what the hell did I just read..
Yaar context mein lijiye .. aisey copy paste karengey to Shakespeare bhi nukkadwaley qawalli sey battar sunaiga ...