What's new

Daily Mail apologises to PM Shehbaz over 'false accusations'

Where did Daily Mail day that SS laundered money to UK, please share the link or stop spreading lies.

A nooni says "Stops spreading lies"
wah wah wah

Sharifs are decedents of Winston Churchil, From Amristar's Dulla Phuallan wala tu Knights of Avonfield, their hard earned money in England....why do they need to launder money to England...they did not even steal any money from Pakistan....
 
. . .
Fake reporting. They have apologized about NAB investigation only and not the corruption charges ...
Why have they removed the article from all their publications and even asked Google to remove it. The fact is many are finding it hard to digust the news. Many Pakistanis view it differently and many the other way.
 
.
its amazing even after raping the country for 75 years we still have people like @muhammadhafeezmalik @FOOLS_NIGHTMARE supporting rapist Nawaz and Fauji mafia!

No wonder Pakistan is fked!! i really wish such piece of turds could live under lands ruled by shareefs where they are raped every second for rest of their life and treated like roaches!
PDM supporters are beneficiaries as well.
All corrupt criminals the lot of them.
 
.
Why have they removed the article from all their publications and even asked Google to remove it. The fact is many are finding it hard to digust the news. Many Pakistanis view it differently and many the other way.
Did they apologize for the complete news or accepted that complete news was wrong?

Removing news could be any reason ... Political pressure ... High legal fees to fight against filthy rich and filthy corrupt Sicilian mafia and god father (designated by SC) ...

I am not biased but student of law ... There r lot of cases which were crystal clear but couldnt got closed due to influence of this criminal mafia ...

For example hudabiya paper mill case .. it was already proven case with all the documentary evidence but they got free on thale basis of time and not on legal and factual basis ...

Similar is the masood chaprasi case ...
 
.
Kiddo they made allegations of corruption of British tax payers money in their article. They have removed the article and tendered an apology, matter sorted.

are you really that stupid or do you think everyone else is.

Daily mail claimed that SS was accused by NAB during the time when he was the CM of Punjab where in fact it was he was not CM of Punjab. Daily mail tender apology for that mistake. But SS and his goons wanted the word apology and they know their illiterate follower will buy it and you did!

Why SS settled outside the courts LOL
Daily mail got UK tax payers money back from SS LOL

Pakistani people got f'ed by their now PM is not daily mail's concern.
 
. .
All op does it open new thread to spread propaganda and than disappears when facts come out. How about putting a limit because all he does is spread fake news.
 
.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم


فرمان الٰہی ہے ۔

"اے ایمان والو ! اللہ سے ڈرو اور سچے لوگوں کے ساتھ ہوجاؤ.." (توبہ9 : آیت119)

"جھوٹ بولنے والوں پر اللہ کی لعنت.." (آل عمران 3 : آیت61 )


"سچ کو جھوٹ کے ساتھ مت ملاؤ اور جان بوجھ کر سچ بات کو نہ چھپاؤ.." (البقرہ 2 : آیت 24)
 
.
Did they apologize for the complete news or accepted that complete news was wrong?

Removing news could be any reason ... Political pressure ... High legal fees to fight against filthy rich and filthy corrupt Sicilian mafia and god father (designated by SC) ...

I am not biased but student of law ... There r lot of cases which were crystal clear but couldnt got closed due to influence of this criminal mafia ...

For example hudabiya paper mill case .. it was already proven case with all the documentary evidence but they got free on thale basis of time and not on legal and factual basis ...

Similar is the masood chaprasi case ...

Hudabya Paper Mills Case was classic example of political victimisation, according to law of that time there was nothing illegal in that case, law was changed by Musharraf to frame a case, the case was dropped by LHC and SC because Sharifs proved in the court that the law was changed by Musharraf to target them.
 
.
Hudabya Paper Mills Case was classic example of political victimisation, according to law of that time there was nothing illegal in that case, law was changed by Musharraf to frame a case, the case was dropped by LHC and SC because Sharifs proved in the court that the law was changed by Musharraf to target them.
I am fed up of your lies. Hudabiya paper mill case was closed by supreme court not on facts but on the basis of time bared ...

Hudabiya paper mill case was proven case of m9ney laundering with documentary evidence from ishaq dar and qazi family ...

Stop misleading people ... Who deposited the amounts in the name of qazi family and frim which sources ?

U can have your opinion of supporting corrupt people but miss stating the facts is not acceptable ...
 
.
I am fed up of your lies. Hudabiya paper mill case was closed by supreme court not on facts but on the basis of time bared ...

Hudabiya paper mill case was proven case of m9ney laundering with documentary evidence from ishaq dar and qazi family ...

Stop misleading people ... Who deposited the amounts in the name of qazi family and frim which sources ?

U can have your opinion of supporting corrupt people but miss stating the facts is not acceptable ...

You are propagating lies, tame bar was just one aspect,
1- It was not illegal opening benami accounts (Qazi Family Accounts were not illegal) till 2017 when the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 was passed.
2- It was not illegal to bring money IN Pakistan without disclosing the source till 1999, when Musharraf was given absolute powers to amend constitution.
3- There is no evidence that the money went again to UK or out of the country.
 
.
You are propagating lies, tame bar was just one aspect,
1- It was not illegal opening benami accounts (Qazi Family Accounts were not illegal) till 2017 when the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 was passed.
2- It was not illegal to bring money IN Pakistan without disclosing the source till 1999, when Musharraf was given absolute powers to amend constitution.
3- There is no evidence that the money went again to UK or out of the country.
Question is not about how money came question is from where this money came to qazi family account ... Opening of benami account might not be illegal but having assets beyond disclosed source of income was always illegal ... We are not stupid. Why sharief family had to use benami account as this was illegally collected income ... In 90s sharief family change the FERA law and introduce changes that bar law enforcement agencies to question source of income if money came abroad and use qazi family account to bring bribed money into Pakistan ...

Specifically tell me which one of this is not a fact ?

By your logic if today shahbaz sharief pass a law that PM cant be charged for murder and SS murder someone then it will not be counted as crime ?

Stop misleading people ... U have to go to your grave do remember this ...
 
.
Question is not about how money came question is from where this money came to qazi family account ... Opening of benami account might not be illegal but having assets beyond disclosed source of income was always illegal ... We are not stupid. Why sharief family had to use benami account as this was illegally collected income ... In 90s sharief family change the FERA law and introduce changes that bar law enforcement agencies to question source of income if money came abroad and use qazi family account to bring bribed money into Pakistan ...

Specifically tell me which one of this is not a fact ?

By your logic if today shahbaz sharief pass a law that PM cant be charged for murder and SS murder someone then it will not be counted as crime ?

Stop misleading people ... U have to go to your grave do remember this ...

The money was borrowed from Al-Tawfeeq Trust in UK, if there would have to be case it would have been in UK, but UK cleared the matter, in Pakistan there should not be a case for an investment in a Pakistani company.

Even Imran Khan made a law that if you bring money in Pakistan and invest in real estate no questions will be asked, what is wrong if Nawaz Sharif passed a law The Protection of Economic Reform Act, 1992, to improve economic situation in Pakistan?? The law was passed in 1992 they money come in 1996.

Nwaz Sharif and Shehbaz Sharif were not directors or shareholders of HPML but they were wrongly brought in the case.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom