What's new

Da Jiang Innovations (DJI): Galaxy of DRONES

. .
.
Benjamin Joffe ,

CONTRIBUTOR

I cover hardware startups and IoT trends from Asia.

Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.


china-drones.001-1200x675.jpg

Chinese companies won the drone war (Photo: Benjamin Joffe)

Most afternoons, from outside our windows that look out over Shenzhen's giant electronics market in Huaqiangbei, we can hear a familiar high-pitched hiss.

The source is a large plane-like drone, circling endlessly just above us.

Taking down to the streets below one can find everything from imagery quadcopters to toy microdrones. Drone technology is big business in this southern metropolis – China’s undisputed tech hub. And companies such as DJI are at the cutting edge.

But far away from Shenzhen, the picture is not as rosy for established players in this highly-competitive industry. Heavyweights like 3DR and Parrot have been forced into major restructuring of their businesses, GoPro recalled its first drones, and Lily Camera just filed for bankruptcy.


Are Chinese companies winning a drone war?

CES 2017: Chinese Drones Everywhere

Judging by what I saw at the drones area of the CES Consumer Electronic Show in Las Vegas earlier this month, it seemed like China's victory was total.
Xiaomi was displaying a drone with a 4k camera from for a mere $433; in China, Tencent launched a foldable 4k drone for $299.

Xiaomi-Drone-CES.jpg

Xiaomi displays its 4k drone at CES for $433 (Photo: Benjamin Joffe)

Then I had doubts when seeing the booths of Furrion, which showed a giant robot alongside its products, and Contixo, whose booth was manned by Caucasians. But the former turned out to be a Hong Kong company, and the latter the U.S. distributor of a Shenzhen OEM.

Big business indeed, but could such innovative products had already turned into commodities?

Here are a few things to consider:

China Has Won The (First) Consumer Drone War

Technology that enable a remote-controlled stable flight, which impressed a few years back, is now widely available.

“For outdoor imagery it is impossible to compete because of the low technology barriers. Once you start hitting commoditization Chinese companies have a massive edge. Trying to get in DJI’s way is pretty much death,” says Jeffrey Tseng, Founder of the San Francisco-based startup Aevena, which develops indoor drones.

This is indeed what 3DR learned when it switched from its hobbyist niche to mass market.

According to Jenny Lee, General Partner at GGV Capital, a cross-border fund active in hardware (Lee herself is a former drone engineer), the consumer drone market is now going through a consolidation phase.

But is the drone market now in the hands of China's DJI, Yuneec, EHANG, Hover Camera and their likes?

Maybe not. Business use cases require specialized machines and software, and even the consumer market is evolving as software takes precedence. For instance, Juuk, a Silicon Valley-based startup that HAX (the hardware accelerator I help run) invested in, operates based on the conviction that “if you can’t beat them, join them,” by working with Chinese companies to build a drone that interacts and plays different games with you without a remote. Former staff from leading drone companies are also likely to play a key role in the next generation.

More Opportunities In the Commercial Drones Market

This is a consequence of the diversity and specificity of their requirements. Regulations are also crucial and vary with industries and location--sometimes giving an advantage to emerging markets. Beyond the often talked-about delivery drones, the first applications are in construction, agriculture and mining: they operate on private land, with people following safety procedures or equipped with hard hats. Farmland Keeper is a GGV investment which, for instance, does crop-dusting in China.

While the term “drone” today mostly evokes the quadcopter shape, Toivo Annus, the former head of engineering at Skype who turned into a very active drone investor, points out that there is a richer taxonomy: “Different end uses call for different shapes, forms and qualities. There’s blimps, rockets, fixed wing, hybrids. Some are as big as passenger planes, some fit in your hand, some target high or low altitude, short or long distance. The list goes on and is evolving."

The inspection of vertical, hard to access and linear infrastructure are also promising sectors. Things like cell towers, chimneys, oil rigs, roads, pipelines, and so on. Various startups have cropped up to focus on these applications and many believe that consumer and business sectors might converge soon.

Drones Are Like Phones 20 Years Ago

According to Annus, drones are today where phones were 20 years ago, or cars 100 years ago: "A little one-dimensional and frustrating, but already useful with big potential."

According to Michael Novikov, a drone investor with San Francisco-based Knowledge Investments, Western companies are likely to lead in drone "brains" and specialized payloads: “In particular, American, German, British, Israeli and Swiss companies, thanks to avionics, navigation, sensors, processors, onboard data processing and AI, and special purpose equipment.”

“Today, Chinese companies can only catch up. For example, DJI just purchased Hasselblad, a Swedish high-quality camera company,” he adds.

Tseng comments that technologies from the self-driving car stack and the AR side are likely to trickle down to drones.

An Ecosystem For Drones Is Forming

A complete drone ecosystem is forming, but might take years depending on the industry. It includes people flying the drones, regulators, insurers, manufacturers, software companies, and of course their end clients.

The question is, will Chinese companies be able to expand globally? Those who go beyond building hardware and take steps to engage with the ecosystem might. And some have already started.

Applications to HAX accelerator programs in Shenzhen and San Francisco are open. Visit our website to know more before the deadline.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/benjaminjoffe/2017/01/17/has-china-won-the-drone-war/#40c4ec40358f
 
.
China is undoubtedly way ahead in terms of technology........! way to go neighbors.....!
 
. .
I'm a heavy user of drone. And I'm the owner of THREE DRONES, all developed and made by Chinese players.

From my experience with these drones, I can assure you the superb performance and high quality of these drones!! No matter the maneuverability, or the stability at 500m height, or the seamless video connection between the drone and the controller even if the drone is 5~6km away from you. And also friendly price, even the most expensive one, the black one (DJI Mavic Pro), only $1,000 required.
481496006708853885.jpg
 
.
I'm a heavy user of drone. And I'm the owner of THREE DRONES, all developed and made by Chinese players.

From my experience with these drones, I can assure you the superb performance and high quality of these drones!! No matter the maneuverability, or the stability at 500m height, or the seamless video connection between the drone and the controller even if the drone is 5~6km away from you. And also friendly price, even the most expensive one, the black one (DJI Mavic Pro), only $1,000 required.
View attachment 369315

Are they available for export? Could you please share a link?
 
. . .
Sorry, but I can not stop my laugh at this news.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


How An Allegedly Fake Video Killed A Much-Hyped Drone Startup

On Dec. 20, Lily Robotics was up against a wall. It was five days before Christmas, and dozens of eager customers who had spent more than $499 to pre-order the company’s flagship product were wondering if they were ever going to see it.

A San Francisco-based startup that had promised to build an autonomous flying camera, Lily was among the most-anticipated consumer hardware companies in Silicon Valley. In May 2015, its splashy launch video, featuring a four-propeller robot whizzing around a kayaker and snowboarder, went viral and was watched 5.3 million times in its first month. But in Dec. 2016, a year-and-a-half after launch, customers bombarded the company’s Facebook and Twitter accounts, asking about the status of their orders.

“We will start shipping US orders late this month until early 2017 and in the order that they were placed,” Lily wrote on Dec. 20, its last tweet to date from its Twitter account. It never got there. The company announced Wednesday that it would be shutting down.

The Lily Camera, which looked like a droid out of Star Wars, was supposed to be playful, but also revolutionary. While there were other consumer drones that took could capture images, none seemed to match Lily's capabilities: sharp video, water resistance, "Follow Me" features and the ability to take off and land in a person's hand.

Unfortunately, Lily over-promised and never delivered. In an email to customers on Wednesday about its closure, the company said it would return some $34 million it had received in pre-orders to its would-be customers.

The following day, the San Francisco District Attorney filed a civil consumer protection suit alleging the company had intentionally lied to potential customers with its launch video, which purported to showcase Lily's capabilities but was created almost entirely with technology from its rivals. The DA also filed for a temporary restraining order to prevent the company from conducting business, but did allow them to move to refund its customers.

Lily’s demise is another ding in the consumer drone industry, where numerous companies have found it difficult to design and mass produce fully-functional flying robots that people want to buy. GoPro launched its drone last summer, but had to recall it due to a power failure, while 3D Robotics, a well-funded drone startup, changed its focus to enterprise applications after losing millions of dollars when its flagship consumer drone flopped. Earlier this week, French electronics company Parrot laid off a third of its drone division due to a drop in sales.

While Lily was much smaller than GoPro or 3D Robotics, it was, arguably, equally as hyped. With a slogan of “Camera. Reinvented.” Lily is another example of what can go wrong when a tech company promises a grand vision to customers before it sells a working product. Now, its founders face a lawsuit that could haunt them long after they lock up Lily’s doors for good.

The lawsuit alleged that Lily did not have a single prototype that functioned as advertised at the time of the launch video’s filming. The District Attorney also alleged that other parts of the advertisement that consumers were led to be believe were shot by Lily, were instead taken by a $2,000 professional drone, the DJI Inspire. The Inspire, made by the world’s largest consumer drone manufacturer, requires another person to operate via remote control. Lily never disclosed to the public that it used outside devices to make its product video.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full article to be read at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/aarontilley/2017/01/13/lawsuit-killed-lily-robotics-drones/#2a3d611c786c
 
.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dr...ts-down-sued-for-false-advertising-2017-01-12

Drone startup Lily Robotics was sued for false advertising and unfair business practices by the San Francisco District Attorney's Office on Thursday, the same day the company announced it was shutting down after failing to secure more funding. Lily made $34 million in pre-orders last year, and said it would send automatic refunds to customers. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the district attorney's office said Lily failed on its promise to deliver the drones to customers, and it lured sales through a misleading promotional video. Lily's drones had been hyped as revolutionary for their autonomous flight capabilities, and won an innovation award at CES 2016. The San Francisco-based startup had 60,000 orders for the drones, which cost $899. Lily had delayed production of the drones a number of times, and mass production never got off the ground.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom