Max
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2014
- Messages
- 8,411
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
, it makes a mockery out of Indians.
There is no India without Indus, call them gangalander or bharti..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
, it makes a mockery out of Indians.
no sir. anything found on the area now under pakistan control is pakistan's property.India is the rightful owner of all the artifacts found before 1947 on the subcontinent.
no sir. anything found on the area now under pakistan control is pakistan's property.
in the old time sindh i.e. current pakistan and hindh current india were different regions.
in hadiths the sindh and hindh have been shown as different countries.
Then the Pashtuns are certainly not the people of IVC, they can't invade their own land, can they?
BTW, Mughals were Pashtuns?
Oh yes, barring some expected regional differences, we share the same spiritual philosophies that even IVC people used to share.
Buddhism itself is an offshoot of Hinduism and shares the same dharmik philosophies. Besides, Buddhism came much later after the desertion of IVC. In fact, idols of Hindu gods were unearthed from IVC.
See, I have no problem to share the legacy of all of ancient Indian civilization including IVC with Pakistanis, but first Pakistanis have to take a stand on who they are primarily. They cannot be the 500 years (or 1000 years, as Pakistanis claim) of rulers of Hindus, 'proud murderers' of Hindus in Hindukush, the heroic invaders and conquerors, etc. AND the people of IVC at the same time. But can Pakistanis accept that largely they were not the conquerors but the conquered who later made heroes out of their conquerors?
But isn't taking pride in the genocide of their own ancestors, as we see in case of Hindukush, is simply deplorable?
Hmm elaborate
IVC still continues..Great now ivc became Buddhist... Hey dummy.. Budda was born in around 400BCE and IVC was almost finished by 1700BCE (with your knowledge you might say 1700bce was after the 400bce but it is actually counted in reverse) I pity your education bro!!
Dada,Hindukush has nothing to do with killing of hindus and above all hindu,sindhu and khorsan are geographical terms.Himdukush that word for me is story of all those brave inhabitants of east bank of river sindh,who tried to defeat those mighty mountain ranges and sometimes crossed into CA and most of times died.That's why it's name is hindukush.But isn't taking pride in the genocide of their own ancestors, as we see in case of Hindukush, is simply deplorable?
Our bengali babu has forgotten that most of IVC areas are 50% concentrated on those areas which are Pashtuns.Bamiyan by no chance has got any Marhatas or Bengalis.So why did you mention Pashtun kings in the first place ? You too stupid ..?
Pashtuns did rule Delhi, but i have not have read about any Baloch sitting on Delhi throne. There were petty Baloch barons in 18th century in Hariyana but they were subordinates of Mughals and even remained proteges of a Pashtun Najib-ud-duala who was dictator of Delhi for 10 years. http://www.barmazid.com/2016/08/baloch-proteges-of-najib-khan-yousafzai_4.htmlFunny .. Actually the Pashtuns, Baloch etc ruled you clown from Delhi and even Bengal ... While Panjab was a Muslim state and for the most part allied with Pashtun or part of the same country...
You tiny Bengalis were again ruled by invaders and I'm damn sure taken on a joy ride over the Hindukush or to till land or join harems in places like Dir or Zhob.
Pashtuns did rule Delhi, but i have not have read about any Baloch sitting on Delhi throne. There were petty Baloch barons in 18th century in Hariyana but they were subordinates of Mughals and even remained proteges of a Pashtun Najib-ud-duala who was dictator of Delhi for 10 years. http://www.barmazid.com/2016/08/baloch-proteges-of-najib-khan-yousafzai_4.html
Moreover Punjab was not "allied" with Pashtun.......it was one of the province of Khilji, Lodi, Sur and Durrani empires...and on some occasions some Punjabi clans resisted Pashtun domination and rule over them. For example Ghakkars fought against Sher Shah and Islam Shah. And Khokars under Jasrath were rival to Bahlol Lodi , in which the latter emerged as victor.
Moreover its very sinister of you to use word "tiny" for Bengalis and try to direct the resulting hate from them against Pashtuns by saying that Bengali women might have ended up in some harem of Zhob ( a Pashtun district) and Dir (a Pashtun district). Bengal under Sher Shah and Islam Shah, was happy and prosperous..........and Sultan Suleiman Karrani's reign was also great, Bengalis were happy under their rule.....Afghans/Pashtuns were not mean to indigenous Bengalis. This is evident from the fact Bengalis and Afghans jointly resisted Mughal rule in Bengal as late as 1614 AD.
I have already posted my views on the topic........"slow claps" ...
Now piss off... this thread is about IVC not 15th century...
And do try to read my posts you dimwit.
It will be safe in India....
Here in Pakistan, the corrupt Museum officials are involved in selling artifacts and historical coins to black market......also there was recent news that smuggled statues of Gandhara civilization from Swat and Peshawar were caught in Karachi. etc etc etc....
Moreover we have religious nutjobs who might attack Museums and destroy these statues , to earn the title of 'but-shikan'
I have already posted my views on the topic........
P.S: Dont forget to read my signature
My motherland is Lakki Marwat, i am loyal to it.Do you seriously think i give a shyt about some turd whose not even loyal to his kin or the country? a pathological liar who would if needed even change his "waldiat" ?
Now piss off and come back with another fake id.
it was found in the area now belonging to pakistan. it would be given to pakistan. law is clear. before 1947 it was british colony. there was no india or pakistan. before that it was hindustan. not any india or pakistan.Hinduism itself was found in areas that is now called Pakistan...
International laws are clear...you can always refer them...Anything that is found before 1947 belongs to India.
None of the Pakistanis here coming clean on whether they are the conquering invaders from some foreign land, or the conquered local people with ancestral connection to the people of IVC.
I am open to both the stands, but Pakistanis should decide first.