bbccdd1470
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
- Messages
- 790
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
He was just talking about things in general term, where he honestly doesn't know the different political situation between two leaders and what they were or are facing.It would be nice if the development of China, or any other country for that matter, were in such a perfectly linear fashion. Xi and Hu each has his own role to play in different time and space. Hu could not have done what Xi has been doing, and vise versa.
The point is the office of President of China is a ceremonial role and have no actual power whatsoever. What matter is the office of General Secretary of the CCP and Chairman of the Central Military Commission, which have the most power and without any term limit. In theory, if a person want to be dictator as some suggested here, holding those two offices is more than enough. Why so far not even one person become a dictator beside Mao? Because unlike the Western media always portray where ruling class in China is unchecked and ruled by individually, the leadership is actually ruled by collectively, and is holding accountable by both the national congress and the CCP.Patriotic Chinese already know that if Western media praises China, it's usually bad news for China. When they demonize China it's good for China in the long term.
Their tactics are getting too redundant and too 200 A.D.
I'm not understanding why the Indian monkeys and albinos are so upset about this. It doesn't even concern them. And if they think it's a bad thing for China they should encourage it. The fact they (west and white wannabes) are so pissed off at this situation that doesn't concern them mean it's a positive thing for the Chinese nation. Reunification will be sooner than later. The monkeys here cannot do shit about it.
No need to carry on the endless debate with things that don't concern them.
Not to mention, "Limited term" also doesn't guarantee non corruption, such as the "one term" Korean President, where most of them were corrupted and many ended either in jail or suicide. Parliamentary system like UK also allow unlimited term as long as the party get its support by the people, so there have no universal laws to define how many term should be served, as long as that person is capable and best for the country.
Also look at the timeline, the end of the second term of President Xi will be 2023, where that is the critical moment for our economic transition and achieving the military parity with USA in Asia. We can not afford to allow any political crisis or instability at the time, since President Xi have been making a lot of enemies during his anti corruption campaign. We Chinese are practical people and we choose what is best for the moment, if unlimited term became a burden, then we simply change it back to "two term limit" like what Deng did in 1982.
Last edited: