Countries that give and receive the most foreign aid in the world

[ThunderCat]

Don't know how true this is but here it is:

 

[ThunderCat]

@El Sidd any knowledge at your end on this?

 

[Cheepek]

Educate yourself from here

Why Has Modi's India Failed to Internationally Isolate Pakistan Despite its Best Efforts?

https://www.southasiainvestor.com/2022/10/why-has-modis-india-failed-to.html Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has pursued a policy of internationally isolating Pakistan for the last 8 years. Indian diplomats and mainstream media have engaged in a concerted campaign to hurt...

pdf.defence.pk

 

[El Sidd]

@El Sidd any knowledge at your end on this?

No idea. The legal definitions are all blurred.

 

[NG Missile Vessels]

 

[reflecthofgeismar]

The 10 largest donor countries should only give money to countries that bring real political added value to them.
Feeding and artificially propagating people with low IQ does NOTHING except new/more problems.

 

[ThunderCat]

The 10 largest donor countries should only give money to countries that bring real political added value to them.
Feeding and artificially propagating people with low IQ does NOTHING except new/more problems.

But which have been the most receivers amongst the top ten?

 

[reflecthofgeismar]

But which have been the most receivers amongst the top ten?

That is only a variable dude.
I personal don't care.
What I care about is to give aid to countries which don't damage the own Realpolitik.

Let me give you an example.
For America Israel is a relative cheap outpost which produces/creates something and saves 150k US troops in this region.
Jews got $ from America to buy 3/4 from this "aid" US products.
The other 25% is even to a certain part under US influence, US has a fair share in that too. I.e. when the Israelis wanna export something which they developed where this money went in, they have to ask the for US permission.

Germany need a Israel too.
Hungary as an example.

 

[VkdIndian]

This aid thing has been discussed earlier. Quite a few times people get hold of a curtailed document/ article and draw wrong conclusions. The full USAID report is available here:-

https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PBAAJ833.pdf

The specific details for India and Paksiatn are available at this thread on PDF.

https://pdf.defence.pk/threads/less...over-americans-civil-war.754239/post-14088756

From USAID, in per capita terms, Pakistan has received approx 14 times more than that received by India if total aid is taken into account.

OECD is the other major agency that gives aid. It’s report is available here.

https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/World-Development-Aid-at-a-Glance-2019.pdf

OECD aid data from 2010-17 shows that India got 1.8% while Paksiatn got 2% of the total disbursed aid. Considering Indian population size, this would amount to Paksiatn getting about 8 times per capita aid compared to India. Then there are some surprising names in the report. Are these countries poor in any sense? Not really.

Anyone who is really keen to understand this aid business can go over these complete reports and get all the info rather than a poorly authored cryptic article.

 

[Maira La]

And then these subhuman Dindu beggars divert all that money towards fancy chandrayan projects instead of trying to eradicate poverty.

 

[CallSignMaverick]

The biggest achievement of a chaddideshi is to become a whore in India. Shouldn't be talking about Chandrayaan

‘Well-oiled network gets 50,000 Bangladeshi girls trafficked into India every year’ | India News - Times of India

India News: NEW DELHI: Around 50,000 Bangladeshi girls are trafficked to or through India every year and around 5 lakh Bangladeshi women and children aged 12 to 3.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

 

[ThunderCat]

@El Sidd but if true, it means India & Bangladesh would be larger receptionists of foriegn aid, despite some Pajeet & binglo trolls calling Pakistan a beggar state.

 

[El Sidd]

@El Sidd but if true, it means India & Bangladesh would be larger receptionists of foriegn aid, despite some Pajeet & binglo trolls calling Pakistan a beggar state.

Yeah but they actually seem to have made use of it

 

[ThunderCat]

Yeah but they actually seem to have made use of it

They had much larger sums, plus no sanctions, plus no Afghan war, plus no serious floods.

 

[Menthol]

Aid is not free money.

It's a debt actually.

As well as money to fund rebellion in that country.

For example, aid for China, it never went to the China government or Chinese people pocket, but instead it went to Dalai Lama, Hong Kong, and Uighur activists.

The 10 largest donor countries should only give money to countries that bring real political added value to them.
Feeding and artificially propagating people with low IQ does NOTHING except new/more problems.

It's a misconception that foreign aid means charity.

Foreign aid is to serve donor countries instead of targeted countries.