Could Pakistan and Afghanistan go to war?

[Paan Singh]

Stop acting like a child. One day or another NATO has to leave Afghanistan. I have no objection if you are dreaming of US keeping his hundred thousand soldiers in Afghanistan, a country in which 60% of its territory is "practically controlled" by Talibans at the day time and 72% at the night....... You should seriously think to tackle Talibans before sending your troops to protect your assets. And in such case we already know the results.

Pakistanis full of delusions
Ask Afgans if their 70% territory is occupied by taliban...
and U.S is there for atleast 10 yrs and btw,they never came to hunt for osama.They came for permanent bases and they got it and u provided dem and this is the last screw for you .

U.S soldiers got killed due to diffrnt resons and u ppl think that every soldiers is killed for same reson and by taliban
go n serach at ground lever sir...

paksitanis were thinking that we will cut the NH 1 in kargil and india will accept it and we will threaten them with nukes and india wont bring the full force

but exactly opposite happened..so moral of the story is be ready for that which u dont think at all..ur history is full of that

 

[eik_pagall]

Is this some kinda joke? :-B

 

[Mercenary]

If Pakistan and Afghanistan would go to war, I am sure India will take an opportunistic moment to start something on Pakistan's Eastern Border where 90% of our military is deployed.

So 10% of Pakistani Military vs 100% of Afghan military is what will actually happen.

 

[kumarkumar1867]

Agreed. We have to find somebody our own size to mess with. You guy's should stick to messing with small guy's only [like us] and avoid messing with anybody your own size ...... or you get shafted hmmm 1962 when your soldiers slid down the lubricated Himalyas on their excrement !!!

Avoid Chinese like the black plague.

Lolzzzz how do you have face to BS about small guys & big guys thing??? It was stupidity of your side to initiate a war every time in all four wars to get slapped in battle. India though a big guy as you say just defended itself & instead of being shameful of your war-mongering desires in past you blame india for ****-hurts you got???

1962 was our defeat it was due to moron called Nehru who underestimated muscle power & mis-read chinese nature. but now situation is much better than that. Have you read about Chola Incident??

 

[Icarus]

Afghanistan attacked Pakistan at the peak of it's military strength in 1962, the objective was to occupy NWFP (KPK), which they believed was rightfully their territory. The Afghan National Army attacked without provocation and without declaration, the Pak Army as a consequence was nowhere near the western border. However, tribal militias put up such a brave defence that the Afghans had to flee in discord and their dead were delivered to them later on.

So, Pak-Afg war, highly unlikely.

 

[kumarkumar1867]

We can kick India's *** whenever we want to..

Yeah if you mean sending terrorists swines & non-state actors like impotents do to kill civilians.But if you talk about fighting like a Man than thats a different story. Refer to 1965, 1999 & above all 1971 they say History repeats itself.It may really repeat again.

 

[REHAN NIAZI FALCON]

my dreadful dream,
it should never happen....
being a MUSLIM and afghan by blood........... i would oppose it..... we need unity not the war......

 

[Rahil khan]

Pakistanis full of delusions
Ask Afgans if their 70% territory is occupied by taliban...
and U.S is there for atleast 10 yrs and btw,they never came to hunt for osama.They came for permanent bases and they got it and u provided dem and this is the last screw for you .

U.S soldiers got killed due to diffrnt resons and u ppl think that every soldiers is killed for same reson and by taliban
go n serach at ground lever sir...

paksitanis were thinking that we will cut the NH 1 in kargil and india will accept it and we will threaten them with nukes and india wont bring the full force

but exactly opposite happened..so moral of the story is be ready for that which u dont think at all..ur history is full of that

All i can say is "just try to go by road from Kabul to Kandahar" during night...if you ever have a chance. Or just try visit any far flung rural area. You will get the answer. But why you will do that? You can't do it of course. Right??

 

[Icarus]

Yeah if you mean sending terrorists swines & non-state actors like impotents do to kill civilians.But if you talk about fighting like a Man than thats a different story. Refer to 1965, 1999 & above all 1971 they say History repeats itself.It may really repeat again.

Learn to take responsibility for your own security and intelligence failures.

 

[K-Xeroid]

Pakistanis full of delusions
Ask Afgans if their 70% territory is occupied by taliban...
and U.S is there for atleast 10 yrs and btw,they never came to hunt for osama.They came for permanent bases and they got it and u provided dem and this is the last screw for you .

U.S soldiers got killed due to diffrnt resons and u ppl think that every soldiers is killed for same reson and by taliban
go n serach at ground lever sir...

paksitanis were thinking that we will cut the NH 1 in kargil and india will accept it and we will threaten them with nukes and india wont bring the full force

but exactly opposite happened..so moral of the story is be ready for that which u dont think at all..ur history is full of that

Deillusionals are Bharti, always trying to implement their local based analysis on everyone . Open your eyes Mate! Even your dad wants a peace talk with Talibs before exiting , Why ? Do you have answer, even yesterday, Afghan president have again repeated that Talk with all Talib leaders is necessary, why? Their is no actual presence of indian media in A-stan, So how can you expect that anything coming in india media related to A-stan is 100% true? Proxy and propaganda is a part war, but watever is going on you can't even delude yourself from reality. again bringing Kargil , even indian general accepted that IA was failed to achieve anything with their so called military strength, U.S really supported your agenda at then but now when they need your Arms strength in A-stan you are showing your back to them?

 

[insomniac00]

Pakistanis full of delusions
Ask Afgans if their 70% territory is occupied by taliban...
and U.S is there for atleast 10 yrs and btw,they never came to hunt for osama.They came for permanent bases and they got it and u provided dem and this is the last screw for you .

U.S soldiers got killed due to diffrnt resons and u ppl think that every soldiers is killed for same reson and by taliban
go n serach at ground lever sir...

paksitanis were thinking that we will cut the NH 1 in kargil and india will accept it and we will threaten them with nukes and india wont bring the full force

but exactly opposite happened..so moral of the story is be ready for that which u dont think at all..ur history is full of that

dont need to ask afghans. More afghans live in pakistan than in afghanistan itself....you need to research your facts son before orgasming about the last nail...i understand it provides you with a lot of pleasure but who from afghanistan will attack pakistan ??? ANA come on....seriously.....and please every individual with common sense and who is aware of ground reality like you your self said knows if anybody knows afganistan after afganis themselves its pakistan....so get your own facts straight first.

but Yes, i agree with what you said about americans coming to Afghanistan to setup permanent bases plus other reasons serving their interests

 

[Speaker]

Learn to take responsibility for your own security and intelligence failures.

I think we have done that adequately post 26/11, but the point was Pakistan's role in training and sheltering terrorists for the excessively used term "strategic depth". From your post, it looks like you are fine with that policy.

 

[Ticker]

I think we have done that adequately post 26/11, but the point was Pakistan's role in training and sheltering terrorists for the excessively used term "strategic depth". From your post, it looks like you are fine with that policy.

If the Indian officialdom believed in Strategic Depth concept, they would not have changed their strategy from dividing Pakistan in two through deep strikes to remaining short of Pakistan's nuclear threshold.

Obviously they know better than you Sir. They know that a nuclear power does not need strategic depth for their military strategy and thus the defence of their country.

Please get over these old ideas with which you guys come here and try to beat us with the bygones. Come up with something new.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

If the Indian officialdom believed in Strategic Depth concept, they would not have changed their strategy from dividing Pakistan in two through deep strikes to remaining short of Pakistan's nuclear threshold.

Obviously they know better than you Sir. They know that a nuclear power does not need strategic depth for their military strategy and thus the defence of their country.

Please get over these old ideas with which you guys come here and try to beat us with the bygones. Come up with something new.

they cant.....given how obtuse they are

 

[Ticker]

they cant.....given how obtuse they are

ha ha ha ...... I agree with you Sir.