Cosying up with terrorists

[third eye]

yet suddenly the same UN becomes the holy grail when it suits you?

No, you have it wrong. The resolution on J&K is under the following :

The resolution was passed under the Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter (which is devoted to "peaceful settlement of disputes"). It did not consist of directives to the parties, but rather "recommendations".

Hence , it is nothing more than an advisory & is treated as such. Had Pak diplomats been smart , they would have pushed to have these resolutions passed under Chapter VII. A opportunity of a lifetime ( for the nation)was missed. Indians evidently were smart & kept it in Chapter VI.

A man was banned from entering US because of his barbarism.., And you guys elected him your president.

You people really need to educate yourselves & stop thinking from your heart.

If you are referring to Modi, he is the Prime Minister.

so if write down your dogma in 1 simple line it would be
UN is bad when India is at receiving end and good when its pushing forward Indian narrative

As regards J&K, my views are above.

In this case I merely showed a mirror to a poster who was having issues in correlation of the subject to the context it was being discussed

I mean you lot literally throw out all UN resolutions from the window when it comes to Kashmir

Read my remarks above

As for US yes its your lackey as are you its on China

I repeat my question ..How about the UN ? Is it an Indian lackey as you suggested

 

[zip]

Lies and lies...Whatever.., you made this terrorist your CM. Meet the militant monk spreading Islamophobia in India
By Nilanjana Bhowmick
March 24, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...n-india/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9a304d160afa
Amnesty’s statement came after hard-line Hindu monk Yogi Adityanath took power last week in Uttar Pradesh, a state with a population of 200 million. (For reference, Brazil’s population is 200.4 million). As the largest state in India, Uttar Pradesh has great sway over national politics. It is also a volatile state, where in 1992 deadly riots over a disputed temple killed more than 2,000 people.

Adityanath is a controversial and deeply divisive figure for his militant, misogynistic and anti-Muslim rhetoric. He has been a vociferous supporter of a campaign called Love Jihad, ostensibly to stop Muslim youths from marrying Hindu women, claiming, without evidence backing this up, that the intention was to convert them to Islam. His supporters have called for digging up Muslim women from their graves and raping them. In 2015, he said that if he was given the chance, he would install idols of Hindu gods in every mosque. In an undated video uploaded in 2014, he said, “If [Muslims] take one Hindu girl, we’ll take 100 Muslim girls. If they kill one Hindu, we’ll kill 100 Muslims.”
‘Rape Dead Muslim Women’ said Yogi Adityanath, Modi made him Chief Minister of UP in India
https://thelondonpost.net/rape-dead...gi-adityanath-modi-made-chief-minister-india/

It's not anybody's job to decide who can be a CM and who can't .. People will decide and Constitution will bind them to rule in secular way .. Society has a tendency to purify itself with struggle and our Constitution as a ruler society will sort out its internal difference .. Don't worry about CM elected democratically ..We don't support military dictatorship which is using terrorism as state policy whenever it get chance ..

 

[hussain0216]

There is no evidence against Hafeez he is a innocent man

Modi had more evidence of Gujraat massacre and he is indian PM

Pakistan has gone to great lengths to reduce terrorism and defend our people

India third worst hit in world by terror, after Iraq and Afghanistan: US data
Neeraj Chauhan | TNN | Updated: Sep 22, 2018, 12:45 IST
https://m.timesofindia.com/india/in...hanistan-us-data/amp_articleshow/65906875.cms

Whilst india eager to export mischief has made itself terrorism, rape and hindutva infected

 

[Kabira]

So, by that logic, if you Kabira, are not serving Pakistan, should you be hanged too?

I'm not a terrorist.

 

[KAMDEV]

US and India can lick each other, Hafiz Saeed is free Pakistani and free to sit with anyone and anywhere in Pakistan.

Lol wait for another abotabad

 

[Fawadqasim1]

It's not anybody's job to decide who can be a CM and who can't .. People will decide and Constitution will bind them to rule in secular way .. Society has a tendency to purify itself with struggle and our Constitution as a ruler society will sort out its internal difference .. Don't worry about CM elected democratically ..We don't support military dictatorship which is using terrorism as state policy whenever it get chance ..

secular hum

Lol wait for another abotabad

Fingers crossed

 

[hussain0216]

I'm not a terrorist.

Neither is Hafeez, no evidence has been supplied against him

If we arrest him and bring him before a court we have nothing and judge will free him again

 

[KAMDEV]

Congrats Pakistanis, you just confirmed a berth in FATF blacklist.

Yeah they deserve it.

 

[Kabira]

Neither is Hafeez, no evidence has been supplied against him

If we arrest him and bring him before a court we have nothing and judge will free him again

Pakistani courts are a joke. They will not convict someone even with video evidence. lmao

Congrats Pakistanis, you just confirmed a berth in FATF blacklist.

lol not so fast.

 

[IceCold]

No, you have it wrong. The resolution on J&K is under the following :

The resolution was passed under the Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter (which is devoted to "peaceful settlement of disputes"). It did not consist of directives to the parties, but rather "recommendations".

Hence , it is nothing more than an advisory & is treated as such. Had Pak diplomats been smart , they would have pushed to have these resolutions passed under Chapter VII. A opportunity of a lifetime ( for the nation)was missed. Indians evidently were smart & kept it in Chapter VI.

Wrong! You guys dont even accept Chaper VI anymore and call it a bilateral issue. Heck now you dont even acknowledge it as an issue anymore. So quit displaying hypocrisy when it suits you.

You people really need to educate yourselves & stop thinking from your heart.

You mean we need to educate ourself with the Indian version? Thanks but no thanks

As regards J&K, my views are above.

In this case I merely showed a mirror to a poster who was having issues in correlation of the subject to the context it was being discussed

And i showed the mirror back and the hypocrisy at display here.

I repeat my question ..How about the UN ? Is it an Indian lackey as you suggested

Already being answered.

 

[hussain0216]

Pakistani courts are a joke. They will not convict someone even with video evidence. lmao

No more than indian courts

So unless you have any evidence then Hafeez is a free man

 

[lastofthepatriots]

Hafeez Saeed should be hanged for his crimes. Time to build our case as non-terrorist nation in the world.

Lakh di lanat.

 

[Roybot]

Especially not when social media was rife with rumours that Noor-ul-Haq, the minister for Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, had attended the Difa-e-Pakistan Council event on Kashmir at the behest of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

It seems this was done to undermine Shah Mahmood Quereshi. SMQ is very ambitious and is the establishment's man in PTI.

He has been eyeing the top spot for himself and Imran Khan is feeling threatened.

 

[lastofthepatriots]

It seems this was done to undermine Shah Mahmood Quereshi. SMQ is very ambitious and is the establishment's man in PTI.

He has been eyeing the top spot for himself and Imran Khan is feeling threatened.

Glad we could get top tier analysis from rapistan on politics.

 

[El Sidd]

Hafiz Saeid honestly said is more a law abiding citizen than those sitting in the parliament.

India can however Hug a Cactus