Conspiracy theorists claim 1972 photo from Apollo 17 mission proves moon landing was fake SHARE TWEE

[Shahzaz ud din]

Conspiracy theorists claim 1972 photo from Apollo 17 mission proves moon landing was fake
By News Desk
Published: November 19, 2017
185SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL

PHOTO COURTESY: StreetCap1

Conspiracy theorists have endeavoured to disprove the ‘giant leap’ made by man by walking on the moon, with a recent video being uploaded to YouTube highlighting something strange in the six and final moon landing, according to MailOnline.

The user has pointed out that a figure on the lunar surface is not wearing a spacesuit.

Streetcap1, a YouTube user, focuses on an image which purports to show a ‘stagehand’ reflected in the visor of an astronaut after Apollo 17 landed on the moon in December 1972.

On the mission, Eugene Cernan and Harrison ‘Jack’ Schmitt spent about 22 hours on the surface in the Taurus-Littrow valley, while colleague Ronald Evans orbited overhead.

The team are said to have carried out a series of experiments including seismic profiling, atmospheric composition analysis and lunar sampling.

The video clip has garnered more than 53,000 views and contains a commentary by the user who says of the visor reflection: “I thought it looked a bit strange, so I took a picture of it using my software.”

China aims for manned moon landing by 2036

“What we appear to have here is a figure of a human not wearing a spacesuit. There was some dispute back in 2009 of the legitimacy of these photos.”

He describes the strange figure as having “long hair” and “wearing some sort of waistcoat”.

And concludes: “Did we make it to the moon? Where’s this guy’s spacesuit?”


Read more: Conspiracy theorists , Latest , Moon landing

 

[BHarwana]

I will agree that it is fake you can see reflection in the helmet but there is no reflection of the person taking pic.

 

[Georg]

for all the fake beliver... it is long proven that they were realy on the moon and that all still beliving it was fake are just dumb ignorants...

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I was recently watching the Hoax claim videos and they have some really darn good cases

a) Neil Armstrong was forbidden to talk about Moon landing , after the so call landing he gave only 2 interviews
he just never wanted to talk about it !!!!

b) In one of the last speeches he said "I hope the next generation will uncover the veil over truth"




Other Issue with Fake Landing

When you watch the ascend , you video (Animation) you will notice the camera angle looks like a guy was standing on surface of moon as the model of ship move up in space his camera angle "follow" the angle of acend ... i.e its like a Guy is moving his camera up toward sky and following the lander

There was NO SUCH technology to automatically move up from ground level angle to follow the lander vehicle !!!! in 1969 even in 2017 we don't have such technology


You know when you go watch sport event you have camera man that moves side to side

He follows where the ball is moving !!! Same idea ... when the lander moves up/down
the VIdeo NASA had shows camera moving up and down

Did they forget a astronaut on moon who was administrating their camera to move it upwards automatically keeping the lander in PERFECT FOCUS

There were no computers to "LOCK ON" to a item and automatically move up back in 1960's


Look at the "Magnificent" Marvel of technology that NASA claims landed on moon
I want you to take 1 good look at it's construction !!! The tin foil crap and duct tape this is a real replica copy

These details were not visible in the black and white doctored movies which obscured the reality

• Really this !!!! awekward paper/duct tape and wrapped in gold foils Movie prop was the vehicle which people travelled on to moon

Other common sense flaws in acting
a) Neil armstrong lands on the GOOD freaking moon and he is not excited just calm doing his duty like he is throwing away garbage

b) He is not excited , his breath is not fast , and he is not yelling with joy to his collegue buzz hey man humanity did it we landed on moon


NASA claims they have HD quality images from 60's with shadows that no visual artist can explain how can you have 2-3 shadows

It is common sense when you land "DUST would move up " and when it will fall it should have covered the foot of the landers !!! Make it dusty !!! hmm nothing like that happened


All the Shadows are messed up !!! Indicating they had artificial light in studio producing 2 different angles for shadows

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Some of the studio material have marking ....english alphabets

Nasa released horrible quality images on TV (black and white and distorted to avoid public from discovering the truth)

And why is it China's moon is different color then USA moon
With white rocks

More fake light trickery exposed on Apollo mission

 

[Chhatrapati]

Some of the studio material have marking ....english alphabets

Nasa released horrible quality images on TV (black and white and distorted to avoid public from discovering the truth)

These are just theories buddy. There are people who claim earth is flat. Hope you are not one of them.

If the images were tailor made the soviets who could've contested the claims which they didn't. There was soil samples from Lunar missions returned by the astronauts. Which was later confirmed with the Soviets who later had a sample mission for collecting lunar soil.

The images are nothing but shitty propaganda of some conspiracy theorist.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

There are also identified , copied backgrounds in official images , one moment they claim it is from such and such area and few years later it is called something else

The rabbit hole is quite wide

After color TV was more common and they could not pull the shit over the public as color TV can explose their game they decided to stop making hoax TV series of landing


Nice shinny Lander feed

Nice little props created to take the flyby images and display the decent concept fictional movies

These props were used to fake the lander slowly falling to the surface of the moon.


So why did NASA did it ? Simple to not look bad against Soviets the decided to hire the best
Director in USA , at that time in science fiction Kubric. He made a movie 2001 space Odyssy just 1-2 years before this alleged mission and he was ideal person to Film the fake landing

The director , according to people was threatened to never let anyone know about the fake landings and such he makes hints about the FAKE landing in his movie (He hid symbolic representation in his movies about how he was part of the FAKE landing mission)

 

[YeBeWarned]

Hitler escape to Moon, and NASA shuttle was blown up by the Nazi's .. i am dead serious

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

If NASA had HD quality images then why was this shown on TV?

The HD images hmmm

TV footage quality of 1969 TV can be seen here Led zeplin TV broadcast you can see what quality was available for TV shows however NASA decided to broadcast shit on TV

Reference: 1969 Music show why is the TV broadcast of music show not fuzze and distorted like images shown across the globe ?

Now let us compare the Video that was shown to people in 1969 by NASA
On earth when sun is shinning we get the most amazing bright views and crystal clear movies

Now here is another awesome fact !!!

He admitted failing !!! every time he tried in practice to land this shit

Watch the video below and tell me if the flight of this machine resembles anything people see in lunar landing the lunar landing , video makes it seems like the flight was super ... smooth ...haahaaha

Neil Arm strong he never landed the lander once in training every time he had tried before he failed and ejected the ship

Also the flying up part is quite smooth like it is automatic controlled by a perfect computer etc ....

Today in modern time , when you make fighter jet you practice on it 300 times and fly /land 300 times before you go on mission but these guys just tried 2-3 times failed 3 times and then still used that lander to make perfect landing hahahaha just think about the odds

 

[punit]

Moon is flat like earth is some other shape ?

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

So......if from 1 Million miles NASA says this is how big the Earth Looks like
The expected view of earth from Moon would be , Earth would be visible 80% of sky

Then why is this shit so small in the Movie (I mean fake lunar landing)

Aww............. the tiny earth in the landing picture too
Earth was shy that day so it moved away Trillion KM away so it looks so small in all movie images

Would the BIG EARTH NOT be 60-80% of sky instead of the black dark color ?


You see the Tiny earth comes from Kubrick's movie
Imagined in movie was idea that if you are moon the earth would be a tiny ball in sky !!!

However now we know !!!! Earth on Moon would take up 80% of sky view
as shown in image below

100% fair to assume when you are on Moon earth should look like this

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

This is how Chinese reported seeing the earth from Moon

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

This is how Chinese reported seeing the earth from Moon

Then the Chinese definitely faked it.

The moon is VERY far from the earth. About 30 earth widths in the distance. If you were to look at the Earth from the moon it should be about 3.6 times the size of what you see the moon as when viewed from the earth. So look up at the moon and imagine it 3.6 times wider. It won't take up the entire sky.

The Earth is almost twice the size of Mars yet that still wouldn't take up much of the sky. Only the super large planets do.

 

[Development C&P]

This is how Chinese reported seeing the earth from Moon

NO,NO~This pic is PS，from the “We Media”,somebody used as the article's home page~

this is by software: Celestia

 

[A.M.]

This is how Chinese reported seeing the earth from Moon

I'm sorry to say but you are a complete moron.